Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Jul;152(3):1111–1122. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.3.1111

Homeologous plastid DNA transformation in tobacco is mediated by multiple recombination events.

T A Kavanagh 1, N D Thanh 1, N T Lao 1, N McGrath 1, S O Peter 1, E M Horváth 1, P J Dix 1, P Medgyesy 1
PMCID: PMC1460644  PMID: 10388829

Abstract

Efficient plastid transformation has been achieved in Nicotiana tabacum using cloned plastid DNA of Solanum nigrum carrying mutations conferring spectinomycin and streptomycin resistance. The use of the incompletely homologous (homeologous) Solanum plastid DNA as donor resulted in a Nicotiana plastid transformation frequency comparable with that of other experiments where completely homologous plastid DNA was introduced. Physical mapping and nucleotide sequence analysis of the targeted plastid DNA region in the transformants demonstrated efficient site-specific integration of the 7.8-kb Solanum plastid DNA and the exclusion of the vector DNA. The integration of the cloned Solanum plastid DNA into the Nicotiana plastid genome involved multiple recombination events as revealed by the presence of discontinuous tracts of Solanum-specific sequences that were interspersed between Nicotiana-specific markers. Marked position effects resulted in very frequent cointegration of the nonselected peripheral donor markers located adjacent to the vector DNA. Data presented here on the efficiency and features of homeologous plastid DNA recombination are consistent with the existence of an active RecA-mediated, but a diminished mismatch, recombination/repair system in higher-plant plastids.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (202.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alani E., Reenan R. A., Kolodner R. D. Interaction between mismatch repair and genetic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):19–39. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birky C. W., Jr Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 5;92(25):11331–11338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bookjans G., Stummann B. M., Henningsen K. W. Preparation of chloroplast DNA from pea plastids isolated in a medium of high ionic strength. Anal Biochem. 1984 Aug 15;141(1):244–247. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90452-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boynton J. E., Gillham N. W. Chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas. Methods Enzymol. 1993;217:510–536. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(93)17087-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cavalier-Smith T. Electron microscopic evidence for chloroplast fusion in zygotes of Chlamydomonas reinhardii. Nature. 1970 Oct 24;228(5269):333–335. doi: 10.1038/228333a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cerutti H., Ibrahim H. Z., Jagendorf A. T. Treatment of pea (Pisum sativum L.) protoplasts with DNA-damaging agents induces a 39-kilodalton chloroplast protein immunologically related to Escherichia coli RecA. Plant Physiol. 1993 May;102(1):155–163. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cerutti H., Johnson A. M., Boynton J. E., Gillham N. W. Inhibition of chloroplast DNA recombination and repair by dominant negative mutants of Escherichia coli RecA. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;15(6):3003–3011. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.6.3003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cerutti H., Osman M., Grandoni P., Jagendorf A. T. A homolog of Escherichia coli RecA protein in plastids of higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):8068–8072. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chambers S. R., Hunter N., Louis E. J., Borts R. H. The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Nov;16(11):6110–6120. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.11.6110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Daniell H., Datta R., Varma S., Gray S., Lee S. B. Containment of herbicide resistance through genetic engineering of the chloroplast genome. Nat Biotechnol. 1998 Apr;16(4):345–348. doi: 10.1038/nbt0498-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Datta A., Adjiri A., New L., Crouse G. F., Jinks Robertson S. Mitotic crossovers between diverged sequences are regulated by mismatch repair proteins in Saccaromyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Mar;16(3):1085–1093. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.3.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Datta A., Hendrix M., Lipsitch M., Jinks-Robertson S. Dual roles for DNA sequence identity and the mismatch repair system in the regulation of mitotic crossing-over in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 2;94(18):9757–9762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Deng C., Capecchi M. R. Reexamination of gene targeting frequency as a function of the extent of homology between the targeting vector and the target locus. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Aug;12(8):3365–3371. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.8.3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dooner H. K., Martínez-Férez I. M. Recombination occurs uniformly within the bronze gene, a meiotic recombination hotspot in the maize genome. Plant Cell. 1997 Sep;9(9):1633–1646. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.9.1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elliott B., Richardson C., Winderbaum J., Nickoloff J. A., Jasin M. Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jan;18(1):93–101. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.1.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goulding S. E., Olmstead R. G., Morden C. W., Wolfe K. H. Ebb and flow of the chloroplast inverted repeat. Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Aug 27;252(1-2):195–206. doi: 10.1007/BF02173220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hildebrand M., Hallick R. B., Passavant C. W., Bourque D. P. Trans-splicing in chloroplasts: the rps 12 loci of Nicotiana tabacum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(2):372–376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.2.372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Iratni R., Diederich L., Harrak H., Bligny M., Lerbs-Mache S. Organ-specific transcription of the rrn operon in spinach plastids. J Biol Chem. 1997 May 23;272(21):13676–13682. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.21.13676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kavanagh T. A., O'Driscoll K. M., McCabe P. F., Dix P. J. Mutations conferring lincomycin, spectinomycin, and streptomycin resistance in Solanum nigrum are located in three different chloroplast genes. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Mar;242(6):675–680. doi: 10.1007/BF00283422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Koop H. U., Steinmüller K., Wagner H., Rössler C., Eibl C., Sacher L. Integration of foreign sequences into the tobacco plastome via polyethylene glycol-mediated protoplast transformation. Planta. 1996;199(2):193–201. doi: 10.1007/BF00196559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kowalczykowski S. C., Eggleston A. K. Homologous pairing and DNA strand-exchange proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:991–1043. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.005015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lemieux C., Lee R. W. Nonreciprocal recombination between alleles of the chloroplast 23S rRNA gene in interspecific Chlamydomonas crosses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jun;84(12):4166–4170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.12.4166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lieb M., Tsai M. M., Deonier R. C. Crosses between insertion and point mutations in lambda gene cI: stimulation of neighboring recombination by heterology. Genetics. 1984 Oct;108(2):277–289. doi: 10.1093/genetics/108.2.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matic I., Radman M., Rayssiguier C. Structure of recombinants from conjugational crosses between Escherichia coli donor and mismatch-repair deficient Salmonella typhimurium recipients. Genetics. 1994 Jan;136(1):17–26. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Matsubayashi T., Wakasugi T., Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Zaita N., Hidaka T., Meng B. Y., Ohto C., Tanaka M., Kato A. Six chloroplast genes (ndhA-F) homologous to human mitochondrial genes encoding components of the respiratory chain NADH dehydrogenase are actively expressed: determination of the splice sites in ndhA and ndhB pre-mRNAs. Mol Gen Genet. 1987 Dec;210(3):385–393. doi: 10.1007/BF00327187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McBride K. E., Svab Z., Schaaf D. J., Hogan P. S., Stalker D. M., Maliga P. Amplification of a chimeric Bacillus gene in chloroplasts leads to an extraordinary level of an insecticidal protein in tobacco. Biotechnology (N Y) 1995 Apr;13(4):362–365. doi: 10.1038/nbt0495-362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Medgyesy P., Fejes E., Maliga P. Interspecific chloroplast recombination in a Nicotiana somatic hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):6960–6964. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.6960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Modrich P., Lahue R. Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombination, and cancer biology. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:101–133. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.000533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Morel P., Stasiak A., Ehrlich S. D., Cassuto E. Effect of length and location of heterologous sequences on RecA-mediated strand exchange. J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 5;269(31):19830–19835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Negritto M. T., Wu X., Kuo T., Chu S., Bailis A. M. Influence of DNA sequence identity on efficiency of targeted gene replacement. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jan;17(1):278–286. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.1.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Newman S. M., Boynton J. E., Gillham N. W., Randolph-Anderson B. L., Johnson A. M., Harris E. H. Transformation of chloroplast ribosomal RNA genes in Chlamydomonas: molecular and genetic characterization of integration events. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):875–888. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Newman S. M., Harris E. H., Johnson A. M., Boynton J. E., Gillham N. W. Nonrandom distribution of chloroplast recombination events in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: evidence for a hotspot and an adjacent cold region. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):413–429. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. O'Neill C., Horváth G. V., Horváth E., Dix P. J., Medgyesy P. Chloroplast transformation in plants: polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment of protoplasts is an alternative to biolistic delivery systems. Plant J. 1993 May;3(5):729–738. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Petit M. A., Dimpfl J., Radman M., Echols H. Control of large chromosomal duplications in Escherichia coli by the mismatch repair system. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):327–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Radman M., Wagner R. Mismatch recognition in chromosomal interactions and speciation. Chromosoma. 1993 Jun;102(6):369–373. doi: 10.1007/BF00360400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rayssiguier C., Thaler D. S., Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989 Nov 23;342(6248):396–401. doi: 10.1038/342396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rochaix J. D. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as the photosynthetic yeast. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:209–230. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.001233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Roeder G. S. Chromosome synapsis and genetic recombination: their roles in meiotic chromosome segregation. Trends Genet. 1990 Dec;6(12):385–389. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90297-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shen P., Huang H. V. Effect of base pair mismatches on recombination via the RecBCD pathway. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Aug;218(2):358–360. doi: 10.1007/BF00331291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shen P., Huang H. V. Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: dependence on substrate length and homology. Genetics. 1986 Mar;112(3):441–457. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.3.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shinozaki K., Ohme M., Tanaka M., Wakasugi T., Hayashida N., Matsubayashi T., Zaita N., Chunwongse J., Obokata J., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. EMBO J. 1986 Sep;5(9):2043–2049. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04464.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smolik-Utlaut S., Petes T. D. Recombination of plasmids into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome is reduced by small amounts of sequence heterogeneity. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;3(7):1204–1211. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.7.1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Staub J. M., Maliga P. Long regions of homologous DNA are incorporated into the tobacco plastid genome by transformation. Plant Cell. 1992 Jan;4(1):39–45. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sweetser D. B., Hough H., Whelden J. F., Arbuckle M., Nickoloff J. A. Fine-resolution mapping of spontaneous and double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals reversible mitotic conversion polarity. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):3863–3875. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.3863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Watt V. M., Ingles C. J., Urdea M. S., Rutter W. J. Homology requirements for recombination in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(14):4768–4772. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.14.4768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Worth L., Jr, Clark S., Radman M., Modrich P. Mismatch repair proteins MutS and MutL inhibit RecA-catalyzed strand transfer between diverged DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3238–3241. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang D., Waldman A. S. Fine-resolution analysis of products of intrachromosomal homeologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jul;17(7):3614–3628. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.7.3614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zahrt T. C., Maloy S. Barriers to recombination between closely related bacteria: MutS and RecBCD inhibit recombination between Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella typhi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 2;94(18):9786–9791. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. de Wind N., Dekker M., Berns A., Radman M., te Riele H. Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer. Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):321–330. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90319-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. te Riele H., Maandag E. R., Berns A. Highly efficient gene targeting in embryonic stem cells through homologous recombination with isogenic DNA constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 1;89(11):5128–5132. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.11.5128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES