Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Jul;152(3):909–919. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.3.909

Radiosensitive and mitotic recombination phenotypes of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae dun1 mutant defective in DNA damage-inducible gene expression.

M Fasullo 1, J Koudelik 1, P AhChing 1, P Giallanza 1, C Cera 1
PMCID: PMC1460661  PMID: 10388811

Abstract

The biological significance of DNA damage-induced gene expression in conferring resistance to DNA-damaging agents is unclear. We investigated the role of DUN1-mediated, DNA damage-inducible gene expression in conferring radiation resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The DUN1 gene was assigned to the RAD3 epistasis group by quantitating the radiation sensitivities of dun1, rad52, rad1, rad9, rad18 single and double mutants, and of the dun1 rad9 rad52 triple mutant. The dun1 and rad52 single mutants were similar in terms of UV sensitivities; however, the dun1 rad52 double mutant exhibited a synergistic decrease in UV resistance. Both spontaneous intrachromosomal and heteroallelic gene conversion events between two ade2 alleles were enhanced in dun1 mutants, compared to DUN1 strains, and elevated recombination was dependent on RAD52 but not RAD1 gene function. Spontaneous sister chromatid exchange (SCE), as monitored between truncated his3 fragments, was not enhanced in dun1 mutants, but UV-induced SCE and heteroallelic recombination were enhanced. Ionizing radiation and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)-induced DNA damage did not exhibit greater recombinogenicity in the dun1 mutant compared to the DUN1 strain. We suggest that one function of DUN1-mediated DNA damage-induced gene expression is to channel the repair of UV damage into a nonrecombinogenic repair pathway.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (170.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aboussekhra A., Chanet R., Adjiri A., Fabre F. Semidominant suppressors of Srs2 helicase mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae map in the RAD51 gene, whose sequence predicts a protein with similarities to procaryotic RecA proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;12(7):3224–3234. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.3224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aboussekhra A., Vialard J. E., Morrison D. E., de la Torre-Ruiz M. A., Cernáková L., Fabre F., Lowndes N. F. A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription. EMBO J. 1996 Aug 1;15(15):3912–3922. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen J. B., Zhou Z., Siede W., Friedberg E. C., Elledge S. J. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 1994 Oct 15;8(20):2401–2415. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.20.2401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailis A. M., Arthur L., Rothstein R. Genome rearrangement in top3 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a functional RAD1 excision repair gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;12(11):4988–4993. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.11.4988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barker D. G., White J. H., Johnston L. H. The nucleotide sequence of the DNA ligase gene (CDC9) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a gene which is cell-cycle regulated and induced in response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Dec 9;13(23):8323–8337. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.23.8323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Basile G., Aker M., Mortimer R. K. Nucleotide sequence and transcriptional regulation of the yeast recombinational repair gene RAD51. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;12(7):3235–3246. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brennan R. J., Swoboda B. E., Schiestl R. H. Oxidative mutagens induce intrachromosomal recombination in yeast. Mutat Res. 1994 Jul 16;308(2):159–167. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90151-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen D. C., Yang B. C., Kuo T. T. One-step transformation of yeast in stationary phase. Curr Genet. 1992 Jan;21(1):83–84. doi: 10.1007/BF00318659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cole G. M., Mortimer R. K. Failure to induce a DNA repair gene, RAD54, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not affect DNA repair or recombination phenotypes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;9(8):3314–3322. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.8.3314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cole G. M., Schild D., Lovett S. T., Mortimer R. K. Regulation of RAD54- and RAD52-lacZ gene fusions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Mar;7(3):1078–1084. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.3.1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davidson J. F., Whyte B., Bissinger P. H., Schiestl R. H. Oxidative stress is involved in heat-induced cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 14;93(10):5116–5121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.10.5116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Elledge S. J., Davis R. W. Identification and isolation of the gene encoding the small subunit of ribonucleotide reductase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: DNA damage-inducible gene required for mitotic viability. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Aug;7(8):2783–2793. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.8.2783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fasullo M. T., Davis R. W. Recombinational substrates designed to study recombination between unique and repetitive sequences in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6215–6219. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fasullo M., Bennett T., AhChing P., Koudelik J. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint reduces the DNA damage-associated stimulation of directed translocations. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Mar;18(3):1190–1200. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.3.1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fasullo M., Dave P. Mating type regulates the radiation-associated stimulation of reciprocal translocation events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Apr;243(1):63–70. doi: 10.1007/BF00283877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fishman-Lobell J., Haber J. E. Removal of nonhomologous DNA ends in double-strand break recombination: the role of the yeast ultraviolet repair gene RAD1. Science. 1992 Oct 16;258(5081):480–484. doi: 10.1126/science.1411547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Galli A., Schiestl R. H. Hydroxyurea induces recombination in dividing but not in G1 or G2 cell cycle arrested yeast cells. Mutat Res. 1996 Jul 5;354(1):69–75. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(96)00037-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Galli A., Schiestl R. H. On the mechanism of UV and gamma-ray-induced intrachromosomal recombination in yeast cells synchronized in different stages of the cell cycle. Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Aug 21;248(3):301–310. doi: 10.1007/BF02191597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ho Y., Mason S., Kobayashi R., Hoekstra M., Andrews B. Role of the casein kinase I isoform, Hrr25, and the cell cycle-regulatory transcription factor, SBF, in the transcriptional response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 21;94(2):581–586. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.2.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jackson J. A., Fink G. R. Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):306–311. doi: 10.1038/292306a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnston L. H., White J. H., Johnson A. L., Lucchini G., Plevani P. The yeast DNA polymerase I transcript is regulated in both the mitotic cell cycle and in meiosis and is also induced after DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Jul 10;15(13):5017–5030. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.13.5017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jong A. Y., Kuo C. L., Campbell J. L. The CDC8 gene of yeast encodes thymidylate kinase. J Biol Chem. 1984 Sep 10;259(17):11052–11059. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kadyk L. C., Hartwell L. H. Replication-dependent sister chromatid recombination in rad1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):469–487. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kadyk L. C., Hartwell L. H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):387–402. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Levin D. E., Bartlett-Heubusch E. Mutants in the S. cerevisiae PKC1 gene display a cell cycle-specific osmotic stability defect. J Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;116(5):1221–1229. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.5.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Malkova A., Ivanov E. L., Haber J. E. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):7131–7136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Navas T. A., Sanchez Y., Elledge S. J. RAD9 and DNA polymerase epsilon form parallel sensory branches for transducing the DNA damage checkpoint signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 1996 Oct 15;10(20):2632–2643. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.20.2632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Palladino F., Klein H. L. Analysis of mitotic and meiotic defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae SRS2 DNA helicase mutants. Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):23–37. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pati D., Keller C., Groudine M., Plon S. E. Reconstitution of a MEC1-independent checkpoint in yeast by expression of a novel human fork head cDNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jun;17(6):3037–3046. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.6.3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Paulovich A. G., Armour C. D., Hartwell L. H. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 genes are required for tolerating irreparable, ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. Genetics. 1998 Sep;150(1):75–93. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rattray A. J., Symington L. S. Multiple pathways for homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):45–56. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ruby S. W., Szostak J. W. Specific Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes are expressed in response to DNA-damaging agents. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Jan;5(1):75–84. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rupp W. D., Wilde C. E., 3rd, Reno D. L., Howard-Flanders P. Exchanges between DNA strands in ultraviolet-irradiated Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1971 Oct 14;61(1):25–44. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90204-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sclafani R. A., Fangman W. L. Yeast gene CDC8 encodes thymidylate kinase and is complemented by herpes thymidine kinase gene TK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Sep;81(18):5821–5825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.18.5821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Siede W., Robinson G. W., Kalainov D., Malley T., Friedberg E. C. Regulation of the RAD2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol. 1989 Dec;3(12):1697–1707. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00155.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Siede W., Robinson G. W., Kalainov D., Malley T., Friedberg E. C. Regulation of the RAD2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol. 1989 Dec;3(12):1697–1707. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00155.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):317–322. doi: 10.1126/science.3291120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Weinert T. A., Kiser G. L., Hartwell L. H. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 15;8(6):652–665. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yakes F. M., Van Houten B. Mitochondrial DNA damage is more extensive and persists longer than nuclear DNA damage in human cells following oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 21;94(2):514–519. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.2.514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhao X., Muller E. G., Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell. 1998 Sep;2(3):329–340. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80277-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhou Z., Elledge S. J. DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell. 1993 Dec 17;75(6):1119–1127. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90321-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES