Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Oct;153(2):665–679. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.665

Multiple heterologies increase mitotic double-strand break-induced allelic gene conversion tract lengths in yeast.

J A Nickoloff 1, D B Sweetser 1, J A Clikeman 1, G J Khalsa 1, S L Wheeler 1
PMCID: PMC1460766  PMID: 10511547

Abstract

Spontaneous and double-strand break (DSB)-induced allelic recombination in yeast was investigated in crosses between ura3 heteroalleles inactivated by an HO site and a +1 frameshift mutation, with flanking markers defining a 3.4-kbp interval. In some crosses, nine additional phenotypically silent RFLP mutations were present at approximately 100-bp intervals. Increasing heterology from 0.2 to 1% in this interval reduced spontaneous, but not DSB-induced, recombination. For DSB-induced events, 75% were continuous tract gene conversions without a crossover in this interval; discontinuous tracts and conversions associated with a crossover each comprised approximately 7% of events, and 10% also converted markers in unbroken alleles. Loss of heterozygosity was seen for all markers centromere distal to the HO site in 50% of products; such loss could reflect gene conversion, break-induced replication, chromosome loss, or G2 crossovers. Using telomere-marked strains we determined that nearly all allelic DSB repair occurs by gene conversion. We further show that most allelic conversion results from mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA. Interestingly, markers shared between the sparsely and densely marked interval converted at higher rates in the densely marked interval. Thus, the extra markers increased gene conversion tract lengths, which may reflect mismatch repair-induced recombination, or a shift from restoration- to conversion-type repair.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (168.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahn B. Y., Livingston D. M. Mitotic gene conversion lengths, coconversion patterns, and the incidence of reciprocal recombination in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid system. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3685–3693. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bianchi M. E., Radding C. M. Insertions, deletions and mismatches in heteroduplex DNA made by recA protein. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(2 Pt 1):511–520. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90185-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borts R. H., Haber J. E. Length and distribution of meiotic gene conversion tracts and crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Sep;123(1):69–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borts R. H., Haber J. E. Meiotic recombination in yeast: alteration by multiple heterozygosities. Science. 1987 Sep 18;237(4821):1459–1465. doi: 10.1126/science.2820060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borts R. H., Leung W. Y., Kramer W., Kramer B., Williamson M., Fogel S., Haber J. E. Mismatch repair-induced meiotic recombination requires the pms1 gene product. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):573–584. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosco G., Haber J. E. Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture. Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1037–1047. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chambers S. R., Hunter N., Louis E. J., Borts R. H. The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Nov;16(11):6110–6120. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.11.6110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen W., Jinks-Robertson S. Mismatch repair proteins regulate heteroduplex formation during mitotic recombination in yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Nov;18(11):6525–6537. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.11.6525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen W., Jinks-Robertson S. The role of the mismatch repair machinery in regulating mitotic and meiotic recombination between diverged sequences in yeast. Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1299–1313. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen W., Jinks-Robertson S. The role of the mismatch repair machinery in regulating mitotic and meiotic recombination between diverged sequences in yeast. Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1299–1313. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cho J. W., Khalsa G. J., Nickoloff J. A. Gene-conversion tract directionality is influenced by the chromosome environment. Curr Genet. 1998 Oct;34(4):269–279. doi: 10.1007/s002940050396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Claverys J. P., Lacks S. A. Heteroduplex deoxyribonucleic acid base mismatch repair in bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1986 Jun;50(2):133–165. doi: 10.1128/mr.50.2.133-165.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Critchlow S. E., Jackson S. P. DNA end-joining: from yeast to man. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Oct;23(10):394–398. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DasGupta C., Radding C. M. Lower fidelity of RecA protein catalysed homologous pairing with a superhelical substrate. Nature. 1982 Jan 7;295(5844):71–73. doi: 10.1038/295071a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Datta A., Adjiri A., New L., Crouse G. F., Jinks Robertson S. Mitotic crossovers between diverged sequences are regulated by mismatch repair proteins in Saccaromyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Mar;16(3):1085–1093. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.3.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Datta A., Hendrix M., Lipsitch M., Jinks-Robertson S. Dual roles for DNA sequence identity and the mismatch repair system in the regulation of mitotic crossing-over in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 2;94(18):9757–9762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Detloff P., Petes T. D. Measurements of excision repair tracts formed during meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1805–1814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Detloff P., White M. A., Petes T. D. Analysis of a gene conversion gradient at the HIS4 locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):113–123. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Elliott B., Richardson C., Winderbaum J., Nickoloff J. A., Jasin M. Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jan;18(1):93–101. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.1.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Friis J., Roman H. The effect of the mating-type alleles on intragenic recombination in yeast. Genetics. 1968 May;59(1):33–36. doi: 10.1093/genetics/59.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gilbertson L. A., Stahl F. W. A test of the double-strand break repair model for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):27–41. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Grilley M., Holmes J., Yashar B., Modrich P. Mechanisms of DNA-mismatch correction. Mutat Res. 1990 Sep-Nov;236(2-3):253–267. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(90)90009-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harris S., Rudnicki K. S., Haber J. E. Gene conversions and crossing over during homologous and homeologous ectopic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Holbeck S. L., Smith G. R. Chi enhances heteroduplex DNA levels during recombination. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):879–891. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Judd S. R., Petes T. D. Physical lengths of meiotic and mitotic gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1988 Mar;118(3):401–410. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.3.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Keil R. L., Roeder G. S. Cis-acting, recombination-stimulating activity in a fragment of the ribosomal DNA of S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(2 Pt 1):377–386. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kirkpatrick D. T., Dominska M., Petes T. D. Conversion-type and restoration-type repair of DNA mismatches formed during meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):1693–1705. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Klein H. L. Lack of association between intrachromosomal gene conversion and reciprocal exchange. 1984 Aug 30-Sep 5Nature. 310(5980):748–753. doi: 10.1038/310748a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Larionov V., Kouprina N., Eldarov M., Perkins E., Porter G., Resnick M. A. Transformation-associated recombination between diverged and homologous DNA repeats is induced by strand breaks. Yeast. 1994 Jan;10(1):93–104. doi: 10.1002/yea.320100109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leung W., Malkova A., Haber J. E. Gene targeting by linear duplex DNA frequently occurs by assimilation of a single strand that is subject to preferential mismatch correction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jun 24;94(13):6851–6856. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liang F., Han M., Romanienko P. J., Jasin M. Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 28;95(9):5172–5177. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lichten M., Fox M. S. Evidence for inclusion of regions of nonhomology in heteroduplex products of bacteriophage lambda recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(22):7180–7184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.22.7180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Malkova A., Ivanov E. L., Haber J. E. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):7131–7136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Matic I., Rayssiguier C., Radman M. Interspecies gene exchange in bacteria: the role of SOS and mismatch repair systems in evolution of species. Cell. 1995 Feb 10;80(3):507–515. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90501-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mezard C., Nicolas A. Homologous, homeologous, and illegitimate repair of double-strand breaks during transformation of a wild-type strain and a rad52 mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1278–1292. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Morrow D. M., Connelly C., Hieter P. "Break copy" duplication: a model for chromosome fragment formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):371–382. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Myers R. S., Stahl F. W. Chi and the RecBC D enzyme of Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Genet. 1994;28:49–70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.28.120194.000405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mézard C., Pompon D., Nicolas A. Recombination between similar but not identical DNA sequences during yeast transformation occurs within short stretches of identity. Cell. 1992 Aug 21;70(4):659–670. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90434-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Negritto M. T., Wu X., Kuo T., Chu S., Bailis A. M. Influence of DNA sequence identity on efficiency of targeted gene replacement. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jan;17(1):278–286. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.1.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nickoloff J. A., Chen E. Y., Heffron F. A 24-base-pair DNA sequence from the MAT locus stimulates intergenic recombination in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7831–7835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nickoloff J. A., Reynolds R. J. Subcloning with new ampicillin- and kanamycin-resistant analogs of pUC19. Biotechniques. 1991 Apr;10(4):469-70, 472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nicolas A., Petes T. D. Polarity of meiotic gene conversion in fungi: contrasting views. Experientia. 1994 Mar 15;50(3):242–252. doi: 10.1007/BF01924007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Porter S. E., White M. A., Petes T. D. Genetic evidence that the meiotic recombination hotspot at the HIS4 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not represent a site for a symmetrically processed double-strand break. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):5–19. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Priebe S. D., Westmoreland J., Nilsson-Tillgren T., Resnick M. A. Induction of recombination between homologous and diverged DNAs by double-strand gaps and breaks and role of mismatch repair. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;14(7):4802–4814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ray B. L., White C. I., Haber J. E. Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the "stuck" mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):5372–5380. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rayssiguier C., Thaler D. S., Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989 Nov 23;342(6248):396–401. doi: 10.1038/342396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Reenan R. A., Kolodner R. D. Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):975–985. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Resnick M. A., Zgaga Z., Hieter P., Westmoreland J., Fogel S., Nilsson-Tillgren T. Recombinant repair of diverged DNAs: a study of homoeologous chromosomes and mammalian YACs in yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Jul;234(1):65–73. doi: 10.1007/BF00272346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Roitgrund C., Steinlauf R., Kupiec M. Donation of information to the unbroken chromosome in double-strand break repair. Curr Genet. 1993 May-Jun;23(5-6):414–422. doi: 10.1007/BF00312628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Decreasing gradients of gene conversion on both sides of the initiation site for meiotic recombination at the ARG4 locus in yeast. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):813–822. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Selva E. M., New L., Crouse G. F., Lahue R. S. Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1175–1188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sugawara N., Pâques F., Colaiácovo M., Haber J. E. Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 and Msh3 repair proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9214–9219. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sun H., Treco D., Szostak J. W. Extensive 3'-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90270-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sweetser D. B., Hough H., Whelden J. F., Arbuckle M., Nickoloff J. A. Fine-resolution mapping of spontaneous and double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals reversible mitotic conversion polarity. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):3863–3875. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.3863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Symington L. S., Petes T. D. Expansions and contractions of the genetic map relative to the physical map of yeast chromosome III. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;8(2):595–604. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Taghian D. G., Nickoloff J. A. Chromosomal double-strand breaks induce gene conversion at high frequency in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Nov;17(11):6386–6393. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.11.6386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Voelkel-Meiman K., Roeder G. S. Gene conversion tracts stimulated by HOT1-promoted transcription are long and continuous. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):851–867. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Differential effects of base-pair mismatch on intrachromosomal versus extrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5340–5344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Watnick T. J., Gandolph M. A., Weber H., Neumann H. P., Germino G. G. Gene conversion is a likely cause of mutation in PKD1. Hum Mol Genet. 1998 Aug;7(8):1239–1243. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.8.1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Weng Y. S., Nickoloff J. A. Evidence for independent mismatch repair processing on opposite sides of a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998 Jan;148(1):59–70. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Weng Y. S., Whelden J., Gunn L., Nickoloff J. A. Double-strand break-induced mitotic gene conversion: examination of tract polarity and products of multiple recombinational repair events. Curr Genet. 1996 Mar;29(4):335–343. doi: 10.1007/BF02208614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yang D., Waldman A. S. Fine-resolution analysis of products of intrachromosomal homeologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jul;17(7):3614–3628. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.7.3614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. de Wind N., Dekker M., Berns A., Radman M., te Riele H. Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer. Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):321–330. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90319-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES