Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Nov;153(3):1463–1474. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.3.1463

A quantitative model of the relationship between phenotypic variance and heterozygosity at marker loci under partial selfing.

P David 1
PMCID: PMC1460806  PMID: 10545474

Abstract

Negative relationships between allozyme heterozygosity and morphological variance have often been observed and interpreted as evidence for increased developmental stability in heterozygotes. However, inbreeding can also generate such relationships by decreasing heterozygosity at neutral loci and redistributing genetic variance at the same time. I here provide a quantitative genetic model of this process by analogy with heterozygosity-fitness relationships. Inbreeding generates negative heterozygosity-variance relationships irrespective of the genetic architecture of the trait. This holds for fitness traits as well as neutral traits, the effect being stronger for fitness traits under directional dominance or overdominance. The order of magnitude of heterozygosity-variance regressions is compatible with empirical data even with very low inbreeding. Although developmental stability effects cannot be excluded, inbreeding is a parsimonious explanation that should be seriously considered to explain correlations between heterozygosity and both mean and variance of phenotypes in natural populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (202.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chakraborty R. Biochemical heterozygosity and phenotypic variability of polygenic traits. Heredity (Edinb) 1987 Aug;59(Pt 1):19–28. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1987.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chakraborty R., Ryman N. Relationship of mean and variance of genotypic values with heterozygosity per individual in a natural population. Genetics. 1983 Jan;103(1):149–152. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.1.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. David P., Delay B., Berthou P., Jarne P. Alternative models for allozyme-associated heterosis in the marine bivalve Spisula ovalis. Genetics. 1995 Apr;139(4):1719–1726. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.4.1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deng H. W. Estimating within-locus nonadditive coefficient and discriminating dominance versus overdominance as the genetic cause of heterosis. Genetics. 1998 Apr;148(4):2003–2014. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.4.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Houle D. Allozyme-associated heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):789–801. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. King D. P. Enzyme heterozygosity associated with anatomical character variance and growth in the herring (Clupea harengus L.). Heredity (Edinb) 1985 Jun;54(Pt 3):289–296. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1985.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leary R. F., Allendorf F. W., Knudsen K. L. Developmental stability and enzyme heterozygosity in rainbow trout. Nature. 1983 Jan 6;301(5895):71–72. doi: 10.1038/301071a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Livshits G., Kobyliansky E. Lerner's concept of developmental homeostasis and the problem of heterozygosity level in natural populations. Heredity (Edinb) 1985 Dec;55(Pt 3):341–353. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1985.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mitton J. B. Relationship between heterozygosity for enzyme loci and variation of morphological characters in natural populations. Nature. 1978 Jun 22;273(5664):661–662. doi: 10.1038/273661a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ota T., Cockerham C. C. Detrimental genes with partial selfing and effects on a neutral locus. Genet Res. 1974 Apr;23(2):191–200. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300014816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pamilo P., Pálsson S. Associative overdominance, heterozygosity and fitness. Heredity (Edinb) 1998 Oct;81(Pt 4):381–389. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00395.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Robertson A. The Effect of Inbreeding on the Variation Due to Recessive Genes. Genetics. 1952 Mar;37(2):189–207. doi: 10.1093/genetics/37.2.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Strauss S. H. Heterosis at Allozyme Loci under Inbreeding and Crossbreeding in PINUS ATTENUATA. Genetics. 1986 May;113(1):115–134. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.1.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Strobeck C. Partial selfing and linkage: the effect of a heterotic locus on a neutral locus. Genetics. 1979 May;92(1):305–315. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.1.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES