Abstract
Nonsynonymous substitutions in DNA cause amino acid substitutions while synonymous substitutions in DNA leave amino acids unchanged. The cause of the correlation between the substitution rates at nonsynonymous (K(A)) and synonymous (K(S)) sites in mammals is a contentious issue, and one that impacts on many aspects of molecular evolution. Here we use a large set of orthologous mammalian genes to investigate the causes of the K(A)-K(S) correlation in rodents. The strength of the K(A)-K(S) correlation exceeds the neutral theory expectation when substitution rates are estimated using algorithmic methods, but not when substitution rates are estimated by maximum likelihood. Irrespective of this methodological uncertainty the strength of the K(A)-K(S) correlation appears mostly due to tandem substitutions, an excess of which is generated by substitutional nonindependence. Doublet mutations cannot explain the excess of tandem synonymous-nonsynonymous substitutions, and substitution patterns indicate that selection on silent sites is the likely cause. We find no evidence for selection on codon usage. The nature of the relationship between synonymous divergence and base composition is unclear because we find a significant correlation if we use maximum-likelihood methods but not if we use algorithmic methods. Finally, we find that K(S) is reduced at the start of genes, which suggests that selection for RNA structure may affect silent sites in mammalian protein-coding genes.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (140.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Akashi H., Eyre-Walker A. Translational selection and molecular evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998 Dec;8(6):688–693. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80038-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comeron J. M., Aguadé M. Synonymous substitutions in the Xdh gene of Drosophila: heterogeneous distribution along the coding region. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1053–1062. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duret L., Mouchiroud D., Gouy M. HOVERGEN: a database of homologous vertebrate genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jun 25;22(12):2360–2365. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.12.2360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eyre-Walker A. C. An analysis of codon usage in mammals: selection or mutation bias? J Mol Evol. 1991 Nov;33(5):442–449. doi: 10.1007/BF02103136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eyre-Walker A., Bulmer M. Reduced synonymous substitution rate at the start of enterobacterial genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Sep 25;21(19):4599–4603. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.19.4599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eyre-Walker A. Evidence of selection on silent site base composition in mammals: potential implications for the evolution of isochores and junk DNA. Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):675–683. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.2.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eyre-Walker A. Problems with parsimony in sequences of biased base composition. J Mol Evol. 1998 Dec;47(6):686–690. doi: 10.1007/pl00006427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eyre-Walker A. Recombination and mammalian genome evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Jun 22;252(1335):237–243. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldman N., Yang Z. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Sep;11(5):725–736. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes A. L., Yeager M. Comparative evolutionary rates of introns and exons in murine rodents. J Mol Evol. 1997 Aug;45(2):125–130. doi: 10.1007/pl00006211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W. H., Wu C. I., Luo C. C. A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Mar;2(2):150–174. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lipman D. J., Wilbur W. J. Interaction of silent and replacement changes in eukaryotic coding sequences. J Mol Evol. 1984;21(2):161–167. doi: 10.1007/BF02100090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Makalowski W., Boguski M. S. Evolutionary parameters of the transcribed mammalian genome: an analysis of 2,820 orthologous rodent and human sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Aug 4;95(16):9407–9412. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Makalowski W., Boguski M. S. Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution distances are correlated in mouse and rat genes. J Mol Evol. 1998 Aug;47(2):119–121. doi: 10.1007/pl00006367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McVean G. T., Hurst L. D. Evidence for a selectively favourable reduction in the mutation rate of the X chromosome. Nature. 1997 Mar 27;386(6623):388–392. doi: 10.1038/386388a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McVean G. T., Hurst L. D. Molecular evolution of imprinted genes: no evidence for antagonistic coevolution. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 May 22;264(1382):739–746. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Synonymous substitution rates in Drosophila: mitochondrial versus nuclear genes. J Mol Evol. 1997 Oct;45(4):378–391. doi: 10.1007/pl00006243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mouchiroud D., Gautier C., Bernardi G. Frequencies of synonymous substitutions in mammals are gene-specific and correlated with frequencies of nonsynonymous substitutions. J Mol Evol. 1995 Jan;40(1):107–113. doi: 10.1007/BF00166602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohta T., Ina Y. Variation in synonymous substitution rates among mammalian genes and the correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous divergences. J Mol Evol. 1995 Dec;41(6):717–720. doi: 10.1007/BF00173150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith N. G., Hurst L. D. Sensitivity of patterns of molecular evolution to alterations in methodology: a critique of Hughes and Yeager. J Mol Evol. 1998 Oct;47(4):493–500. doi: 10.1007/pl00013151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K., Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 May;10(3):512–526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfe K. H., Sharp P. M., Li W. H. Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature. 1989 Jan 19;337(6204):283–285. doi: 10.1038/337283a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Z. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Oct;13(5):555–556. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/13.5.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]