Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Feb;154(2):777–785. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.2.777

Nested cladistic analysis indicates population fragmentation shapes genetic diversity in a freshwater mussel.

T F Turner 1, J C Trexler 1, J L Harris 1, J L Haynes 1
PMCID: PMC1460930  PMID: 10655229

Abstract

Recently developed phylogeographic analyses that incorporate genealogical relationships of alleles offer the exciting prospect of disentangling historical from contemporary events. However, the relative advantages and shortfalls of this approach remain to be studied. We compared the nested cladistic method to the more traditional analysis of variance approach in a study of intraspecific genetic variation in the freshwater mussel, Lampsilis hydiana. We surveyed 257 specimens for nucleotide sequence level variation in a fragment of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene. When compared side by side, nested cladistic analysis and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) identified fragmentation of Arkansas river populations from remaining populations to the southwest. Nested cladistic analysis identified a second, more recent separation of Ouachita and Upper Saline river populations that was not detected by AMOVA. Differences among analytical methods probably arise from treatment of spatial hierarchical information: hierarchical groups emerge via a parsimony criterion in nested cladistic analysis but must be specified a priori in AMOVA. Both methods identified significant genetic structure among localities within hierarchical groups. Results from AMOVA suggested little gene flow among local populations with an island model. However, inferences about process that gave rise to patterns at this level were not possible in nested cladistic analysis, because an ancestral (interior) haplotype was not observed for a key one-step clade in the parsimony network. Our results suggest that, under some circumstances, nested cladistic analysis has lower power than more traditional analysis of variance to infer processes at the local population level.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (121.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Devereux J., Haeberli P., Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):387–395. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Excoffier L., Smouse P. E., Quattro J. M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479–491. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Holsinger K. E., Mason-Gamer R. J. Hierarchical analysis of nucleotide diversity in geographically structured populations. Genetics. 1996 Feb;142(2):629–639. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.2.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hudson R. R. How often are polymorphic restriction sites due to a single mutation? Theor Popul Biol. 1989 Aug;36(1):23–33. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(89)90021-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lydeard C., Mulvey M., Davis G. M. Molecular systematics and evolution of reproductive traits of North American freshwater unionacean mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) as inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Nov 29;351(1347):1593–1603. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ricklefs R. E. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):167–171. doi: 10.1126/science.235.4785.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Roff D. A., Bentzen P. The statistical analysis of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms: chi 2 and the problem of small samples. Mol Biol Evol. 1989 Sep;6(5):539–545. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Skibinski D. O., Gallagher C., Beynon C. M. Mitochondrial DNA inheritance. Nature. 1994 Apr 28;368(6474):817–818. doi: 10.1038/368817b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Templeton A. R., Routman E., Phillips C. A. Separating population structure from population history: a cladistic analysis of the geographical distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):767–782. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zouros E., Ball A. O., Saavedra C., Freeman K. R. Mitochondrial DNA inheritance. Nature. 1994 Apr 28;368(6474):818–818. doi: 10.1038/368818a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES