Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Feb;154(2):813–821. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.2.813

Fixation of advantageous alleles in partially self-fertilizing populations. The effect of different selection modes.

C Damgaard 1
PMCID: PMC1460932  PMID: 10655232

Abstract

The expected fixation probability of an advantageous allele was examined in a partially self-fertilizing hermaphroditic plant species using the diffusion approximation. The selective advantage of the advantageous allele was assumed to be increased viability, increased fecundity, or an increase in male fitness. The mode of selection, as well as the selfing rate, the population size, and the dominance of the advantageous allele, affect the fixation probability of the allele. In general it was found that increases in selfing rate decrease the fixation probability under male sexual selection, increase fixation probability under fecundity selection, and increase when recessive and decrease when dominant under viability selection. In some cases the highest fixation probability of advantageous alleles under fecundity or under male sexual selection occurred at an intermediary selfing rate. The expected mean fixation times of the advantageous allele were also examined using the diffusion approximation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bodmer W F. Differential Fertility in Population Genetics Models. Genetics. 1965 Mar;51(3):411–424. doi: 10.1093/genetics/51.3.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caballero A., Etheridge A. M., Hill W. G. The time of detection of recessive visible genes with non-random mating. Genet Res. 1992 Dec;60(3):201–207. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300030950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caballero A., Hill W. G. Effective size of nonrandom mating populations. Genetics. 1992 Apr;130(4):909–916. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caballero A., Hill W. G. Effects of partial inbreeding on fixation rates and variation of mutant genes. Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):493–507. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Feldman M. W., Christiansen F. B., Liberman U. On some models of fertility selection. Genetics. 1983 Dec;105(4):1003–1010. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.4.1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KIMURA M. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics. 1962 Jun;47:713–719. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.6.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nordborg M., Donnelly P. The coalescent process with selfing. Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):1185–1195. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ota T., Cockerham C. C. Detrimental genes with partial selfing and effects on a neutral locus. Genet Res. 1974 Apr;23(2):191–200. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300014816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Otto S. P., Whitlock M. C. The probability of fixation in populations of changing size. Genetics. 1997 Jun;146(2):723–733. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.2.723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pollak E., Sabran M. On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. III. Fixation probabilities under partial selfing when heterozygotes are intermediate in viability. Genetics. 1992 Aug;131(4):979–985. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.4.979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Uyenoyama M. K., Waller D. M. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation-selection balance at one and two loci. Theor Popul Biol. 1991 Aug;40(1):14–46. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(91)90045-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES