Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Feb;154(2):885–891. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.2.885

Identification of heading date quantitative trait locus Hd6 and characterization of its epistatic interactions with Hd2 in rice using advanced backcross progeny.

T Yamamoto 1, H Lin 1, T Sasaki 1, M Yano 1
PMCID: PMC1460948  PMID: 10655238

Abstract

A backcrossed population (BC(4)F(2)) derived from a cross between a japonica rice variety, Nipponbare, as the recurrent parent and an indica rice variety, Kasalath, as the donor parent showed a long-range variation in days to heading. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis revealed that two QTL, one on chromosome 3, designated Hd6, and another on chromosome 2, designated Hd7, were involved in this variation; and Hd6 was precisely mapped as a single Mendelian factor by using progeny testing (BC(4)F(3)). The nearly isogenic line with QTL (QTL-NIL) that carries the chromosomal segment from Kasalath for the Hd6 region in Nipponbare's genetic background was developed by marker-assisted selection. In a day-length treatment test, the QTL-NIL for Hd6 prominently increased days to heading under a 13.5-hr day length compared with the recurrent parent, Nipponbare, suggesting that Hd6 controls photoperiod sensitivity. QTL analysis of the F(2) population derived from a cross between the QTL-NILs revealed existence of an epistatic interaction between Hd2, which is one of the photoperiod sensitivity genes detected in a previous analysis, and Hd6. The day-length treatment tests of these QTL-NILs, including the line introgressing both Hd2 and Hd6, also indicated an epistatic interaction for photoperiod sensitivity between them.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (145.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alpert K. B., Tanksley S. D. High-resolution mapping and isolation of a yeast artificial chromosome contig containing fw2.2: a major fruit weight quantitative trait locus in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 24;93(26):15503–15507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernacchi D., Tanksley S. D. An interspecific backcross of Lycopersicon esculentum x L. hirsutum: linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual compatibility factors and floral traits. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):861–877. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Causse M. A., Fulton T. M., Cho Y. G., Ahn S. N., Chunwongse J., Wu K., Xiao J., Yu Z., Ronald P. C., Harrington S. E. Saturated molecular map of the rice genome based on an interspecific backcross population. Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):1251–1274. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doebley J., Stec A., Gustus C. teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):333–346. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dorweiler J., Stec A., Kermicle J., Doebley J. Teosinte glume architecture 1: A Genetic Locus Controlling a Key Step in Maize Evolution. Science. 1993 Oct 8;262(5131):233–235. doi: 10.1126/science.262.5131.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards M. D., Stuber C. W., Wendel J. F. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):113–125. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eshed Y., Zamir D. Less-than-additive epistatic interactions of quantitative trait loci in tomato. Genetics. 1996 Aug;143(4):1807–1817. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HALASZ I., MAJOR S. A tüdö gennyes megbetegedéseinek helyi kezelése. Orv Hetil. 1954 Sep 12;95(37):1020–1025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harushima Y., Yano M., Shomura A., Sato M., Shimano T., Kuboki Y., Yamamoto T., Lin S. Y., Antonio B. A., Parco A. A high-density rice genetic linkage map with 2275 markers using a single F2 population. Genetics. 1998 Jan;148(1):479–494. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kurata N., Nagamura Y., Yamamoto K., Harushima Y., Sue N., Wu J., Antonio B. A., Shomura A., Shimizu T., Lin S. Y. A 300 kilobase interval genetic map of rice including 883 expressed sequences. Nat Genet. 1994 Dec;8(4):365–372. doi: 10.1038/ng1294-365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lander E. S., Green P., Abrahamson J., Barlow A., Daly M. J., Lincoln S. E., Newberg L. A., Newburg L. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics. 1987 Oct;1(2):174–181. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lark K. G., Chase K., Adler F., Mansur L. M., Orf J. H. Interactions between quantitative trait loci in soybean in which trait variation at one locus is conditional upon a specific allele at another. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9;92(10):4656–4660. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Li Z., Pinson S. R., Park W. D., Paterson A. H., Stansel J. W. Epistasis for three grain yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics. 1997 Feb;145(2):453–465. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.2.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lin Y. R., Schertz K. F., Paterson A. H. Comparative analysis of QTLs affecting plant height and maturity across the Poaceae, in reference to an interspecific sorghum population. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):391–411. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paterson A. H., Lander E. S., Hewitt J. D., Peterson S., Lincoln S. E., Tanksley S. D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):721–726. doi: 10.1038/335721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Paterson A. H., Lin Y. R., Li Z., Schertz K. F., Doebley J. F., Pinson S. R., Liu S. C., Stansel J. W., Irvine J. E. Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic Loci. Science. 1995 Sep 22;269(5231):1714–1718. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5231.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Singh K., Ishii T., Parco A., Huang N., Brar D. S., Khush G. S. Centromere mapping and orientation of the molecular linkage map of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 11;93(12):6163–6168. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stuber C. W., Lincoln S. E., Wolff D. W., Helentjaris T., Lander E. S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):823–839. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tanksley S. D. Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:205–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.001225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Xiao J., Li J., Yuan L., Tanksley S. D. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):745–754. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yano M., Sasaki T. Genetic and molecular dissection of quantitative traits in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Sep;35(1-2):145–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yu S. B., Li J. X., Xu C. G., Tan Y. F., Gao Y. J., Li X. H., Zhang Q., Saghai Maroof M. A. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9226–9231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. deVicente M. C., Tanksley S. D. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):585–596. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES