Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Apr;154(4):1819–1825. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.4.1819

Two classes of genes in plants.

N Carels 1, G Bernardi 1
PMCID: PMC1461008  PMID: 10747072

Abstract

Two classes of genes were identified in three Gramineae (maize, rice, barley) and six dicots (Arabidopsis, soybean, pea, tobacco, tomato, potato). One class, the GC-rich class, contained genes with no, or few, short introns. In contrast, the GC-poor class contained genes with numerous, long introns. The similarity of the properties of each class, as present in the genomes of maize and Arabidopsis, is particularly remarkable in view of the fact that these plants exhibit large differences in genome size, average intron size, and DNA base composition. The functional relevance of the two classes of genes is stressed by (1) the conservation in homologous genes from maize and Arabidopsis not only of the number of introns and of their positions, but also of the relative size of concatenated introns; and (2) the existence of two similar classes of genes in vertebrates; interestingly, the differences in intron sizes and numbers in genes from the GC-poor and GC-rich classes are much more striking in plants than in vertebrates.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barakat A., Matassi G., Bernardi G. Distribution of genes in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana and its implications for the genome organization of plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Aug 18;95(17):10044–10049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.17.10044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell M. V., Cowper A. E., Lefranc M. P., Bell J. I., Screaton G. R. Influence of intron length on alternative splicing of CD44. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Oct;18(10):5930–5941. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.10.5930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernardi G., Bernardi G. Compositional patterns in the nuclear genome of cold-blooded vertebrates. J Mol Evol. 1990 Oct;31(4):265–281. doi: 10.1007/BF02101122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernardi G. The human genome: organization and evolutionary history. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:445–476. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.002305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brenner S., Elgar G., Sandford R., Macrae A., Venkatesh B., Aparicio S. Characterization of the pufferfish (Fugu) genome as a compact model vertebrate genome. Nature. 1993 Nov 18;366(6452):265–268. doi: 10.1038/366265a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carels N., Barakat A., Bernardi G. The gene distribution of the maize genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Nov 21;92(24):11057–11060. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.24.11057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carels N, Hatey P, Jabbari K, Bernardi G. Compositional properties of homologous coding sequences from plants . J Mol Evol. 1998 Jan;46(1):45–53. doi: 10.1007/pl00006282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chiapello H., Lisacek F., Caboche M., Hénaut A. Codon usage and gene function are related in sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene. 1998 Mar 16;209(1-2):GC1–GC38. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00671-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duret L., Mouchiroud D., Gautier C. Statistical analysis of vertebrate sequences reveals that long genes are scarce in GC-rich isochores. J Mol Evol. 1995 Mar;40(3):308–317. doi: 10.1007/BF00163235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gouy M., Gautier C., Attimonelli M., Lanave C., di Paola G. ACNUC--a portable retrieval system for nucleic acid sequence databases: logical and physical designs and usage. Comput Appl Biosci. 1985 Sep;1(3):167–172. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/1.3.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hughes A. L., Hughes M. K. Small genomes for better flyers. Nature. 1995 Oct 5;377(6548):391–391. doi: 10.1038/377391a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Matassi G., Montero L. M., Salinas J., Bernardi G. The isochore organization and the compositional distribution of homologous coding sequences in the nuclear genome of plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Jul 11;17(13):5273–5290. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.13.5273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pearson W. R., Wood T., Zhang Z., Miller W. Comparison of DNA sequences with protein sequences. Genomics. 1997 Nov 15;46(1):24–36. doi: 10.1006/geno.1997.4995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pizon V., Cuny G., Bernardi G. Nucleotide sequence organization in the very small genome of a tetraodontid fish, Arothron diadematus. Eur J Biochem. 1984 Apr 2;140(1):25–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1984.tb08062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Salinas J., Matassi G., Montero L. M., Bernardi G. Compositional compartmentalization and compositional patterns in the nuclear genomes of plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 May 25;16(10):4269–4285. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.10.4269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Villard L., Tassone F., Crnogorac-Jurcević T., Clancy K., Gardiner K. Analysis of pufferfish homologues of the AT-rich human APP gene. Gene. 1998 Mar 27;210(1):17–24. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(98)00032-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES