Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Jun;155(2):569–576. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.569

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae mre11(ts) allele confers a separation of DNA repair and telomere maintenance functions.

M Chamankhah 1, T Fontanie 1, W Xiao 1
PMCID: PMC1461118  PMID: 10835381

Abstract

The yeast Mre11 protein participates in important cellular functions such as DNA repair and telomere maintenance. Analysis of structure-function relationships of Mre11 has led to identification of several separation-of-function mutations as well as N- and C-terminal domains essential for Mre11 meiotic and mitotic activities. Previous studies have established that there is a strong correlation between Mre11 DNA repair and telomere maintenance functions and that Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex formation appears to be essential for both of these activities. Here we report that the mre11(ts) allele, previously shown to cause temperature-dependent defects in DNA repair and meiosis, confers a temperature-independent telomere shortening, indicating that mre11(ts) is a separation-of-function mutation with respect to DNA repair and telomere maintenance. In a yeast two-hybrid system, Mre11(ts) fails to form a homodimer or interact with Rad50 and Xrs2 irrespective of experimental temperatures. These observations collectively suggest that the Pro(162)Ser substitution in Mre11(ts) confers a novel separation of Mre11 mitotic functions. Moreover, we observed that while overexpression of the 5'-3' exonuclease gene EXO1 partially complements the MMS sensitivity of mre11, rad50, and xrs2 null mutants, it has no effect on telomere shortening in these strains. This result provides additional evidence on possible involvement of distinctive mechanisms in DNA repair and telomere maintenance by the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (236.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ajimura M., Leem S. H., Ogawa H. Identification of new genes required for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1993 Jan;133(1):51–66. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartel P. L., Fields S. Analyzing protein-protein interactions using two-hybrid system. Methods Enzymol. 1995;254:241–263. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(95)54018-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boulton S. J., Jackson S. P. Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing. EMBO J. 1998 Mar 16;17(6):1819–1828. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.6.1819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christianson T. W., Sikorski R. S., Dante M., Shero J. H., Hieter P. Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene. 1992 Jan 2;110(1):119–122. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90454-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dionne I., Wellinger R. J. Processing of telomeric DNA ends requires the passage of a replication fork. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Dec 1;26(23):5365–5371. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.23.5365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dong Z., Zhong Q., Chen P. L. The Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein is essential for Mre11 phosphorylation upon DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 1999 Jul 9;274(28):19513–19516. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.28.19513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Estojak J., Brent R., Golemis E. A. Correlation of two-hybrid affinity data with in vitro measurements. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5820–5829. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Furuse M., Nagase Y., Tsubouchi H., Murakami-Murofushi K., Shibata T., Ohta K. Distinct roles of two separable in vitro activities of yeast Mre11 in mitotic and meiotic recombination. EMBO J. 1998 Nov 2;17(21):6412–6425. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.21.6412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goedecke W., Eijpe M., Offenberg H. H., van Aalderen M., Heyting C. Mre11 and Ku70 interact in somatic cells, but are differentially expressed in early meiosis. Nat Genet. 1999 Oct;23(2):194–198. doi: 10.1038/13821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guarente L. Yeast promoters and lacZ fusions designed to study expression of cloned genes in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:181–191. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haber J. E. The many interfaces of Mre11. Cell. 1998 Nov 25;95(5):583–586. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81626-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hill J., Donald K. A., Griffiths D. E., Donald G. DMSO-enhanced whole cell yeast transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Oct 25;19(20):5791–5791. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.20.5791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johzuka K., Ogawa H. Interaction of Mre11 and Rad50: two proteins required for DNA repair and meiosis-specific double-strand break formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 Apr;139(4):1521–1532. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.4.1521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moreau S., Ferguson J. R., Symington L. S. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Jan;19(1):556–566. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.1.556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nairz K., Klein F. mre11S--a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev. 1997 Sep 1;11(17):2272–2290. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.17.2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nugent C. I., Bosco G., Ross L. O., Evans S. K., Salinger A. P., Moore J. K., Haber J. E., Lundblad V. Telomere maintenance is dependent on activities required for end repair of double-strand breaks. Curr Biol. 1998 May 21;8(11):657–660. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70253-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ogawa H., Johzuka K., Nakagawa T., Leem S. H., Hagihara A. H. Functions of the yeast meiotic recombination genes, MRE11 and MRE2. Adv Biophys. 1995;31:67–76. doi: 10.1016/0065-227x(95)99383-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Parenteau J., Wellinger R. J. Accumulation of single-stranded DNA and destabilization of telomeric repeats in yeast mutant strains carrying a deletion of RAD27. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Jun;19(6):4143–4152. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.6.4143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Paull T. T., Gellert M. Nbs1 potentiates ATP-driven DNA unwinding and endonuclease cleavage by the Mre11/Rad50 complex. Genes Dev. 1999 May 15;13(10):1276–1288. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.10.1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Paull T. T., Gellert M. The 3' to 5' exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell. 1998 Jun;1(7):969–979. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80097-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Qiu J., Qian Y., Chen V., Guan M. X., Shen B. Human exonuclease 1 functionally complements its yeast homologues in DNA recombination, RNA primer removal, and mutation avoidance. J Biol Chem. 1999 Jun 18;274(25):17893–17900. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.25.17893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sharples G. J., Leach D. R. Structural and functional similarities between the SbcCD proteins of Escherichia coli and the RAD50 and MRE11 (RAD32) recombination and repair proteins of yeast. Mol Microbiol. 1995 Sep;17(6):1215–1217. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17061215_1.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tsubouchi H., Ogawa H. A novel mre11 mutation impairs processing of double-strand breaks of DNA during both mitosis and meiosis. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jan;18(1):260–268. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.1.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Usui T., Ohta T., Oshiumi H., Tomizawa J., Ogawa H., Ogawa T. Complex formation and functional versatility of Mre11 of budding yeast in recombination. Cell. 1998 Nov 25;95(5):705–716. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81640-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Walmsley R. M., Petes T. D. Genetic control of chromosome length in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(2):506–510. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Xiao W., Chow B. L., Rathgeber L. The repair of DNA methylation damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1996 Dec;30(6):461–468. doi: 10.1007/s002940050157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES