Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Jul;155(3):1415–1427. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1415

Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation.

Y Kim 1, W Stephan 1
PMCID: PMC1461159  PMID: 10880499

Abstract

Due to relatively high rates of strongly selected deleterious mutations, directional selection on favorable alleles (causing hitchhiking effects on linked neutral polymorphisms) is expected to occur while a deleterious mutation-selection balance is present in a population. We analyze this interaction of directional selection and background selection and study their combined effects on neutral variation, using a three-locus model in which each locus is subjected to either deleterious, favorable, or neutral mutations. Average heterozygosity is measured by simulations (1) at the stationary state under the assumption of recurrent hitchhiking events and (2) as a transient level after a single hitchhiking event. The simulation results are compared to theoretical predictions. It is shown that known analytical solutions describing the hitchhiking effect without background selection can be modified such that they accurately predict the joint effects of hitchhiking and background on linked, neutral variation. Generalization of these results to a more appropriate multilocus model (such that background selection can occur at multiple sites) suggests that, in regions of very low recombination rates, stationary levels of nucleotide diversity are primarily determined by hitchhiking, whereas in regions of high recombination, background selection is the dominant force. The implications of these results on the identification and estimation of the relevant parameters of the model are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (195.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N. H. Linkage and the limits to natural selection. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):821–841. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birky C. W., Jr, Walsh J. B. Effects of linkage on rates of molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6414–6418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bénassi V., Depaulis F., Meghlaoui G. K., Veuille M. Partial sweeping of variation at the Fbp2 locus in a west African population of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Mar;16(3):347–353. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlesworth B. Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1996 Oct;68(2):131–149. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300034029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1605–1617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Keightley P. D., Eyre-Walker A. Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates. Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):515–523. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kimura M. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):893–903. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kimura M. Theoretical foundation of population genetics at the molecular level. Theor Popul Biol. 1971 Jun;2(2):174–208. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(71)90014-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mukai T., Cardellino R. A., Watanabe T. K., Crow J. F. The genetic variance for viability and its components in a local population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1974 Dec;78(4):1195–1208. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.4.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nordborg M., Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D. The effect of recombination on background selection. Genet Res. 1996 Apr;67(2):159–174. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300033619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nurminsky D. I., Nurminskaya M. V., De Aguiar D., Hartl D. L. Selective sweep of a newly evolved sperm-specific gene in Drosophila. Nature. 1998 Dec 10;396(6711):572–575. doi: 10.1038/25126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ohta T., Kimura M. The effect of selected linked locus on heterozygosity of neutral alleles (the hitch-hiking effect). Genet Res. 1975 Jun;25(3):313–326. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300015731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peck J. R. A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Genetics. 1994 Jun;137(2):597–606. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.2.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Perlitz M., Stephan W. The mean and variance of the number of segregating sites since the last hitchhiking event. J Math Biol. 1997 Nov;36(1):1–23. doi: 10.1007/s002850050087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schlötterer C., Vogl C., Tautz D. Polymorphism and locus-specific effects on polymorphism at microsatellite loci in natural Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):309–320. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stephan W. An improved method for estimating the rate of fixation of favorable mutations based on DNA polymorphism data. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):959–962. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stephan W., Xing L., Kirby D. A., Braverman J. M. A test of the background selection hypothesis based on nucleotide data from Drosophila ananassae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 12;95(10):5649–5654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tajima F. The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):597–601. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wiehe T. H., Stephan W. Analysis of a genetic hitchhiking model, and its application to DNA polymorphism data from Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Jul;10(4):842–854. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zurovcova M., Eanes W. F. Lack of nucleotide polymorphism in the Y-linked sperm flagellar dynein gene Dhc-Yh3 of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics. 1999 Dec;153(4):1709–1715. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.4.1709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES