Abstract
The genetic analysis of characters that are best considered as functions of some independent and continuous variable, such as age, can be a complicated matter, and a simple and efficient procedure is desirable. Three methods are common in the literature: random regression, orthogonal polynomial approximation, and character process models. The goals of this article are (i) to clarify the relationships between these methods; (ii) to develop a general extension of the character process model that relaxes correlation stationarity, its most stringent assumption; and (iii) to compare and contrast the techniques and evaluate their performance across a range of actual and simulated data. We find that the character process model, as described in 1999 by Pletcher and Geyer, is the most successful method of analysis for the range of data examined in this study. It provides a reasonable description of a wide range of different covariance structures, and it results in the best models for actual data. Our analysis suggests genetic variance for Drosophila mortality declines with age, while genetic variance is constant at all ages for reproductive output. For growth in beef cattle, however, genetic variance increases linearly from birth, and genetic correlations are high across all observed ages.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (500.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Jamrozik J., Schaeffer L. R., Dekkers J. C. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using test day yields and random regression model. J Dairy Sci. 1997 Jun;80(6):1217–1226. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76050-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpatrick M., Heckman N. A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters. J Math Biol. 1989;27(4):429–450. doi: 10.1007/BF00290638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpatrick M., Hill W. G., Thompson R. Estimating the covariance structure of traits during growth and ageing, illustrated with lactation in dairy cattle. Genet Res. 1994 Aug;64(1):57–69. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpatrick M., Lofsvold D., Bulmer M. Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics. 1990 Apr;124(4):979–993. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.4.979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindstrom M. L., Bates D. M. Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics. 1990 Sep;46(3):673–687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pletcher S. D., Geyer C. J. The genetic analysis of age-dependent traits: modeling the character process. Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):825–835. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stram D. O., Lee J. W. Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1171–1177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vonesh E. F., Chinchilli V. M., Pu K. Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models. Biometrics. 1996 Jun;52(2):572–587. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]