Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Dec;156(4):1901–1912. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1901

The Ketel(D) dominant-negative mutations identify maternal function of the Drosophila importin-beta gene required for cleavage nuclei formation.

L Tirián 1, J Puro 1, M Erdélyi 1, I Boros 1, B Papp 1, M Lippai 1, J Szabad 1
PMCID: PMC1461349  PMID: 11102383

Abstract

The Ketel(D) dominant female-sterile mutations and their ketel(r) revertant alleles identify the Ketel gene, which encodes the importin-beta (karyopherin-beta) homologue of Drosophila melanogaster. Embryogenesis does not commence in the Ketel(D) eggs deposited by the Ketel(D)/+ females due to failure of cleavage nuclei formation. When injected into wild-type cleavage embryos, cytoplasm of the Ketel(D) eggs does not inhibit nuclear protein import but prevents cleavage nuclei formation following mitosis. The Ketel(+) transgenes slightly reduce effects of the Ketel(D) mutations. The paternally derived Ketel(D) alleles act as recessive zygotic lethal mutations: the Ketel(D)/- hemizygotes, like the ketel(r)/ketel(r) and the ketel(r)/- zygotes, perish during second larval instar. The Ketel maternal dowry supports their short life. The Ketel(D)-related defects originate most likely following association of the Ketel(D)-encoded mutant molecules with a maternally provided partner. As in the Ketel(D) eggs, embryogenesis does not commence in eggs of germline chimeras with ketel(r)/- germline cells and normal soma, underlining the dominant-negative nature of the Ketel(D) mutations. The ketel(r) homozygous clones are fully viable in the follicle epithelium in wings and tergites. The Ketel gene is not expressed in most larval tissues, as revealed by the expression pattern of a Ketel promoter-lacZ reporter gene.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (482.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burke B., Gerace L. A cell free system to study reassembly of the nuclear envelope at the end of mitosis. Cell. 1986 Feb 28;44(4):639–652. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90273-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Busson D., Gans M., Komitopoulou K., Masson M. Genetic Analysis of Three Dominant Female-Sterile Mutations Located on the X Chromosome of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):309–325. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Corbett A. H., Silver P. A. Nucleocytoplasmic transport of macromolecules. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997 Jun;61(2):193–211. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.61.2.193-211.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cserpán I., Udvardy A. The mechanism of nuclear transport of natural or artificial transport substrates in digitonin-permeabilized cells. J Cell Sci. 1995 May;108(Pt 5):1849–1861. doi: 10.1242/jcs.108.5.1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dasso M., Seki T., Azuma Y., Ohba T., Nishimoto T. A mutant form of the Ran/TC4 protein disrupts nuclear function in Xenopus laevis egg extracts by inhibiting the RCC1 protein, a regulator of chromosome condensation. EMBO J. 1994 Dec 1;13(23):5732–5744. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06911.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Demeter J., Morphew M., Sazer S. A mutation in the RCC1-related protein pim1 results in nuclear envelope fragmentation in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Feb 28;92(5):1436–1440. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Erdélyi M., Máthé E., Szabad J. Genetic and developmental analysis of mutant Ketel alleles that identify the Drosophila importin-beta homologue. Acta Biol Hung. 1997;48(3):323–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Erdélyi M., Szabad J. Isolation and characterization of dominant female sterile mutations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Mutations on the third chromosome. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):111–127. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gant T. M., Goldberg M. W., Allen T. D. Nuclear envelope and nuclear pore assembly: analysis of assembly intermediates by electron microscopy. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998 Jun;10(3):409–415. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gant T. M., Wilson K. L. Nuclear assembly. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997;13:669–695. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldberg M. W., Wiese C., Allen T. D., Wilson K. L. Dimples, pores, star-rings, and thin rings on growing nuclear envelopes: evidence for structural intermediates in nuclear pore complex assembly. J Cell Sci. 1997 Feb;110(Pt 4):409–420. doi: 10.1242/jcs.110.4.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Görlich D., Kutay U. Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999;15:607–660. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jäkel S., Görlich D. Importin beta, transportin, RanBP5 and RanBP7 mediate nuclear import of ribosomal proteins in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 1998 Aug 3;17(15):4491–4502. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.15.4491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kahana J. A., Cleveland D. W. Beyond nuclear transport. Ran-GTP as a determinant of spindle assembly. J Cell Biol. 1999 Sep 20;146(6):1205–1210. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.6.1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Komitopoulou K., Gans M., Margaritis L. H., Kafatos F. C., Masson M. Isolation and Characterization of Sex-Linked Female-Sterile Mutants in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER with Special Attention to Eggshell Mutants. Genetics. 1983 Dec;105(4):897–920. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.4.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kornbluth S., Dasso M., Newport J. Evidence for a dual role for TC4 protein in regulating nuclear structure and cell cycle progression. J Cell Biol. 1994 May;125(4):705–719. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.4.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kutay U., Izaurralde E., Bischoff F. R., Mattaj I. W., Görlich D. Dominant-negative mutants of importin-beta block multiple pathways of import and export through the nuclear pore complex. EMBO J. 1997 Mar 17;16(6):1153–1163. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.6.1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lippai M., Tirián L., Boros I., Mihály J., Erdélyi M., Belecz I., Máthé E., Pósfai J., Nagy A., Udvardy A. The Ketel gene encodes a Drosophila homologue of importin-beta. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1889–1900. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Macaulay C., Forbes D. J. Assembly of the nuclear pore: biochemically distinct steps revealed with NEM, GTP gamma S, and BAPTA. J Cell Biol. 1996 Jan;132(1-2):5–20. doi: 10.1083/jcb.132.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Marshall I. C., Wilson K. L. Nuclear envelope assembly after mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 1997 Feb;7(2):69–74. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(96)10047-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mathe E., Boros I., Josvay K., Li K., Puro J., Kaufman T. C., Szabad J. The Tomaj mutant alleles of alpha Tubulin67C reveal a requirement for the encoded maternal specific tubulin isoform in the sperm aster, the cleavage spindle apparatus and neurogenesis during embryonic development in Drosophila. J Cell Sci. 1998 Apr;111(Pt 7):887–896. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.7.887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mattaj I. W., Englmeier L. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: the soluble phase. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:265–306. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Melchior F., Gerace L. Two-way trafficking with Ran. Trends Cell Biol. 1998 May;8(5):175–179. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(98)01252-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pemberton L. F., Blobel G., Rosenblum J. S. Transport routes through the nuclear pore complex. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998 Jun;10(3):392–399. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80016-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Puro J. Differential mechanisms governing segregation of a univalent in oocytes and spermatocytes of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 1991 Jun;100(5):305–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00360529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Riparbelli M. G., Callaini G. Meiotic spindle organization in fertilized Drosophila oocyte: presence of centrosomal components in the meiotic apparatus. J Cell Sci. 1996 May;109(Pt 5):911–918. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.5.911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sutovsky P., Simerly C., Hewitson L., Schatten G. Assembly of nuclear pore complexes and annulate lamellae promotes normal pronuclear development in fertilized mammalian oocytes. J Cell Sci. 1998 Oct;111(Pt 19):2841–2854. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.19.2841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Szabad J., Erdélyi M., Hoffmann G., Szidonya J., Wright T. R. Isolation and characterization of dominant female sterile mutations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mutations on the second chromosome. Genetics. 1989 Aug;122(4):823–835. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.4.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Szabad J. Genetic requirement of epidermal and female germ line cells in Drosophila in the light of clonal analysis. Int J Dev Biol. 1998;42(3):257–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Szabad J., Jursnich V. A., Bryant P. J. Requirement for cell-proliferation control genes in Drosophila oogenesis. Genetics. 1991 Mar;127(3):525–533. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.3.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thummel C. S., Boulet A. M., Lipshitz H. D. Vectors for Drosophila P-element-mediated transformation and tissue culture transfection. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):445–456. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90177-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Timmons L., Hersperger E., Woodhouse E., Xu J., Liu L. Z., Shearn A. The expression of the Drosophila awd gene during normal development and in neoplastic brain tumors caused by lgl mutations. Dev Biol. 1993 Aug;158(2):364–379. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weis K. Importins and exportins: how to get in and out of the nucleus. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 May;23(5):185–189. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01204-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wieschaus E. Embryonic transcription and the control of developmental pathways. Genetics. 1996 Jan;142(1):5–10. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wozniak R. W., Rout M. P., Aitchison J. D. Karyopherins and kissing cousins. Trends Cell Biol. 1998 May;8(5):184–188. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(98)01248-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang C., Clarke P. R. Chromatin-independent nuclear envelope assembly induced by Ran GTPase in Xenopus egg extracts. Science. 2000 May 26;288(5470):1429–1432. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5470.1429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang C., Hughes M., Clarke P. R. Ran-GTP stabilises microtubule asters and inhibits nuclear assembly in Xenopus egg extracts. J Cell Sci. 1999 Jul;112(Pt 14):2453–2461. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.14.2453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES