Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Dec;156(4):1837–1852. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1837

Linkage disequilibria and the site frequency spectra in the su(s) and su(w(a)) regions of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome.

C H Langley 1, B P Lazzaro 1, W Phillips 1, E Heikkinen 1, J M Braverman 1
PMCID: PMC1461393  PMID: 11102378

Abstract

Over the last decade, surveys of DNA sequence variation in natural populations of several Drosophila species and other taxa have established that polymorphism is reduced in genomic regions characterized by low rates of crossing over per physical length. Parallel studies have also established that divergence between species is not reduced in these same genomic regions, thus eliminating explanations that rely on a correlation between the rates of mutation and crossing over. Several theoretical models (directional hitchhiking, background selection, and random environment) have been proposed as population genetic explanations. In this study samples from an African population (n = 50) and a European population (n = 51) were surveyed at the su(s) (1955 bp) and su(w(a)) (3213 bp) loci for DNA sequence polymorphism, utilizing a stratified SSCP/DNA sequencing protocol. These loci are located near the telomere of the X chromosome, in a region of reduced crossing over per physical length, and exhibit a significant reduction in DNA sequence polymorphism. Unlike most previously surveyed, these loci reveal substantial skews toward rare site frequencies, consistent with the predictions of directional hitchhiking and random environment models and inconsistent with the general predictions of the background selection model (or neutral theory). No evidence for excess geographic differentiation at these loci is observed. Although linkage disequilibrium is observed between closely linked sites within these loci, many recombination events in the genealogy of the sampled alleles can be inferred and the genomic scale of linkage disequilibrium, measured in base pairs between sites, is the same as that observed for loci in regions of normal crossing over. We conclude that gene conversion must be high in these regions of low crossing over.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (770.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguadé M., Meyers W., Long A. D., Langley C. H. Single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis coupled with stratified DNA sequencing reveals reduced sequence variation in the su(s) and su(wa) regions of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):4658–4662. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andolfatto P., Nordborg M. The effect of gene conversion on intralocus associations. Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):1397–1399. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.3.1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):548–550. doi: 10.1038/365548a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berry A. J., Ajioka J. W., Kreitman M. Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1111–1117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Braverman J. M., Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):783–796. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Charlesworth B. Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1996 Oct;68(2):131–149. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300034029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Charlesworth B. Measures of divergence between populations and the effect of forces that reduce variability. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 May;15(5):538–543. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Charlesworth B. The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants. Genet Res. 1994 Jun;63(3):213–227. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen W., Jinks-Robertson S. The role of the mismatch repair machinery in regulating mitotic and meiotic recombination between diverged sequences in yeast. Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1299–1313. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. David J. R., Capy P. Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet. 1988 Apr;4(4):106–111. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90098-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dvorák J., Luo M. C., Yang Z. L. Restriction fragment length polymorphism and divergence in the genomic regions of high and low recombination in self-fertilizing and cross-fertilizing aegilops species. Genetics. 1998 Jan;148(1):423–434. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gillespie J. H. Junk ain't what junk does: neutral alleles in a selected context. Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):291–299. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00470-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hill W. G., Weir B. S. Maximum-likelihood estimation of gene location by linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Apr;54(4):705–714. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hilliker A. J., Harauz G., Reaume A. G., Gray M., Clark S. H., Chovnick A. Meiotic gene conversion tract length distribution within the rosy locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Aug;137(4):1019–1026. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.4.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hudson R. R. Estimating the recombination parameter of a finite population model without selection. Genet Res. 1987 Dec;50(3):245–250. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300023776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1605–1617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics. 1985 Sep;111(1):147–164. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hudson R. R., Slatkin M., Maddison W. P. Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):583–589. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kirkpatrick D. T., Dominska M., Petes T. D. Conversion-type and restoration-type repair of DNA mismatches formed during meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):1693–1705. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Langley C. H., MacDonald J., Miyashita N., Aguadé M. Lack of correlation between interspecific divergence and intraspecific polymorphism at the suppressor of forked region in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Mar 1;90(5):1800–1803. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Martín-Campos J. M., Comerón J. M., Miyashita N., Aguadé M. Intraspecific and interspecific variation at the y-ac-sc region of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Apr;130(4):805–816. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Miyashita N. T., Aguadé M., Langley C. H. Linkage disequilibrium in the white locus region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1993 Oct;62(2):101–109. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300031694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Molecular and phenotypic variation of the white locus region in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1988 Sep;120(1):199–212. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.1.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nachman M. W. Patterns of DNA variability at X-linked loci in Mus domesticus. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1303–1316. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nassif N., Engels W. DNA homology requirements for mitotic gap repair in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 15;90(4):1262–1266. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rutherford S. L., Carpenter A. T. The effect of sequence homozygosity on the frequency of X-chromosomal exchange in Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):725–732. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stephan W., Langley C. H. Evolutionary consequences of DNA mismatch inhibited repair opportunity. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):567–574. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stephan W., Langley C. H. Molecular genetic variation in the centromeric region of the X chromosome in three Drosophila ananassae populations. I. Contrasts between the vermilion and forked loci. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):89–99. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stephan W., Xing L., Kirby D. A., Braverman J. M. A test of the background selection hypothesis based on nucleotide data from Drosophila ananassae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 12;95(10):5649–5654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES