Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Jan;157(1):369–378. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.1.369

Genetic factors required to maintain repression of a paramutagenic maize pl1 allele.

J B Hollick 1, V L Chandler 1
PMCID: PMC1461487  PMID: 11139517

Abstract

A genetic screen identified two novel gene functions required to maintain mitotically and meiotically heritable gene silencing associated with paramutation of the maize purple plant 1 (pl1) locus. Paramutation at pl1 leads to heritable alterations of pl1 gene regulation; the Pl-Rhoades (Pl-Rh) allele, which typically confers strong pigmentation to juvenile and adult plant structures, changes to a lower expression state termed Pl'-mahogany (Pl'). Paramutation spontaneously occurs at low frequencies in Pl-Rh homozygotes but always occurs when Pl-Rh is heterozygous with Pl'. We identified four mutations that caused increased Pl' pigment levels. Allelism tests revealed that three mutations identified two new maize loci, required to maintain repression 1 (rmr1) and rmr2 and that the other mutation represents a new allele of the previously described mediator of paramutation 1 (mop1) locus. RNA levels from Pl' are elevated in rmr mutants and genetic tests demonstrate that Pl' can heritably change back to Pl-Rh in rmr mutant individuals at variable frequencies. Pigment levels controlled by two pl1 alleles that do not participate in paramutation are unaffected in rmr mutants. These results suggest that RMR functions are intimately involved in maintaining the repressed expression state of paramutant Pl' alleles. Despite strong effects on Pl' repression, rmr mutant plants have no gross developmental abnormalities even after several generations of inbreeding, implying that RMR1 and RMR2 functions are not generally required for developmental homeostasis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (310.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amedeo P., Habu Y., Afsar K., Mittelsten Scheid O., Paszkowski J. Disruption of the plant gene MOM releases transcriptional silencing of methylated genes. Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):203–206. doi: 10.1038/35012108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chandler V. L., Eggleston W. B., Dorweiler J. E. Paramutation in maize. Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jun;43(2-3):121–145. doi: 10.1023/a:1006499808317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cogoni C., Macino G. Isolation of quelling-defective (qde) mutants impaired in posttranscriptional transgene-induced gene silencing in Neurospora crassa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 16;94(19):10233–10238. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Csink A. K., Linsk R., Birchler J. A. The Lighten up (Lip) gene of Drosophila melanogaster, a modifier of retroelement expression, position effect variegation and white locus insertion alleles. Genetics. 1994 Sep;138(1):153–163. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dalmay T., Hamilton A., Rudd S., Angell S., Baulcombe D. C. An RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene in Arabidopsis is required for posttranscriptional gene silencing mediated by a transgene but not by a virus. Cell. 2000 May 26;101(5):543–553. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80864-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dooner H. K., Robbins T. P., Jorgensen R. A. Genetic and developmental control of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:173–199. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.001133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dorer D. R., Henikoff S. Expansions of transgene repeats cause heterochromatin formation and gene silencing in Drosophila. Cell. 1994 Jul 1;77(7):993–1002. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90439-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dorweiler J. E., Carey C. C., Kubo K. M., Hollick J. B., Kermicle J. L., Chandler V. L. mediator of paramutation1 is required for establishment and maintenance of paramutation at multiple maize loci. Plant Cell. 2000 Nov;12(11):2101–2118. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.11.2101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elmayan T., Balzergue S., Béon F., Bourdon V., Daubremet J., Guénet Y., Mourrain P., Palauqui J. C., Vernhettes S., Vialle T. Arabidopsis mutants impaired in cosuppression. Plant Cell. 1998 Oct;10(10):1747–1758. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.10.1747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Finnegan E. J., Peacock W. J., Dennis E. S. Reduced DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana results in abnormal plant development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8449–8454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Furner I. J., Sheikh M. A., Collett C. E. Gene silencing and homology-dependent gene silencing in Arabidopsis: genetic modifiers and DNA methylation. Genetics. 1998 Jun;149(2):651–662. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.2.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hollick J. B., Chandler V. L. Epigenetic allelic states of a maize transcriptional regulatory locus exhibit overdominant gene action. Genetics. 1998 Oct;150(2):891–897. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.2.891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hollick J. B., Patterson G. I., Coe E. H., Jr, Cone K. C., Chandler V. L. Allelic interactions heritably alter the activity of a metastable maize pl allele. Genetics. 1995 Oct;141(2):709–719. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.2.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jack J. W., Judd B. H. Allelic pairing and gene regulation: A model for the zeste-white interaction in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Mar;76(3):1368–1372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kakutani T., Jeddeloh J. A., Flowers S. K., Munakata K., Richards E. J. Developmental abnormalities and epimutations associated with DNA hypomethylation mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 29;93(22):12406–12411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kermicle J. L., Alleman M. Gametic imprinting in maize in relation to the angiosperm life cycle. Dev Suppl. 1990:9–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. LYON M. F. Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature. 1961 Apr 22;190:372–373. doi: 10.1038/190372a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meyer P., Heidmann I., Niedenhof I. Differences in DNA-methylation are associated with a paramutation phenomenon in transgenic petunia. Plant J. 1993 Jul;4(1):89–100. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04010089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mourrain P., Béclin C., Elmayan T., Feuerbach F., Godon C., Morel J. B., Jouette D., Lacombe A. M., Nikic S., Picault N. Arabidopsis SGS2 and SGS3 genes are required for posttranscriptional gene silencing and natural virus resistance. Cell. 2000 May 26;101(5):533–542. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80863-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pal-Bhadra M., Bhadra U., Birchler J. A. Cosuppression in Drosophila: gene silencing of Alcohol dehydrogenase by white-Adh transgenes is Polycomb dependent. Cell. 1997 Aug 8;90(3):479–490. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80508-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Patterson G. I., Thorpe C. J., Chandler V. L. Paramutation, an allelic interaction, is associated with a stable and heritable reduction of transcription of the maize b regulatory gene. Genetics. 1993 Nov;135(3):881–894. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.3.881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pirrotta V. PcG complexes and chromatin silencing. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1997 Apr;7(2):249–258. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(97)80135-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reuter G., Spierer P. Position effect variegation and chromatin proteins. Bioessays. 1992 Sep;14(9):605–612. doi: 10.1002/bies.950140907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ronchi A., Petroni K., Tonelli C. The reduced expression of endogenous duplications (REED) in the maize R gene family is mediated by DNA methylation. EMBO J. 1995 Nov 1;14(21):5318–5328. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00216.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Styles E. D., Brink R. A. The Metastable Nature of Paramutable R Alleles in Maize. IV. Parallel Enhancement of R Action in Heterozygotes with r and in Hemizygotes. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):801–811. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Talbert P. B., LeCiel C. D., Henikoff S. Modification of the Drosophila heterochromatic mutation brownDominant by linkage alterations. Genetics. 1994 Feb;136(2):559–571. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.2.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Todd J. J., Vodkin L. O. Duplications That Suppress and Deletions That Restore Expression from a Chalcone Synthase Multigene Family. Plant Cell. 1996 Apr;8(4):687–699. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.4.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vielle-Calzada J. P., Baskar R., Grossniklaus U. Delayed activation of the paternal genome during seed development. Nature. 2000 Mar 2;404(6773):91–94. doi: 10.1038/35003595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Weiler K. S., Wakimoto B. T. Heterochromatin and gene expression in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:577–605. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.003045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wu C. T., Morris J. R. Transvection and other homology effects. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999 Apr;9(2):237–246. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(99)80035-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES