Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Feb;157(2):777–784. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.2.777

SINE insertions in cladistic analyses and the phylogenetic affiliations of Tarsius bancanus to other primates.

J Schmitz 1, M Ohme 1, H Zischler 1
PMCID: PMC1461532  PMID: 11156996

Abstract

Transpositions of Alu sequences, representing the most abundant primate short interspersed elements (SINE), were evaluated as molecular cladistic markers to analyze the phylogenetic affiliations among the primate infraorders. Altogether 118 human loci, containing intronic Alu elements, were PCR analyzed for the presence of Alu sequences at orthologous sites in each of two strepsirhine, New World and Old World monkey species, Tarsius bancanus, and a nonprimate outgroup. Fourteen size-polymorphic amplification patterns exhibited longer fragments for the anthropoids (New World and Old World monkeys) and T. bancanus whereas shorter fragments were detected for the strepsirhines and the outgroup. From these, subsequent sequence analyses revealed three Alu transpositions, which can be regarded as shared derived molecular characters linking tarsiers and anthropoid primates. Concerning the other loci, scenarios are represented in which different SINE transpositions occurred independently in the same intron on the lineages leading both to the common ancestor of anthropoids and to T. bancanus, albeit at different nucleotide positions. Our results demonstrate the efficiency and possible pitfalls of SINE transpositions used as molecular cladistic markers in tracing back a divergence point in primate evolution over 40 million years old. The three Alu insertions characterized underpin the monophyly of haplorhine primates (Anthropoidea and Tarsioidea) from a novel perspective.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (264.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews T. D., Jermiin L. S., Easteal S. Accelerated evolution of cytochrome b in simian primates: adaptive evolution in concert with other mitochondrial proteins? J Mol Evol. 1998 Sep;47(3):249–257. doi: 10.1007/pl00006382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Feng Q., Moran J. V., Kazazian H. H., Jr, Boeke J. D. Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition. Cell. 1996 Nov 29;87(5):905–916. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81997-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goodman M., Porter C. A., Czelusniak J., Page S. L., Schneider H., Shoshani J., Gunnell G., Groves C. P. Toward a phylogenetic classification of Primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Jun;9(3):585–598. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamdi H., Nishio H., Zielinski R., Dugaiczyk A. Origin and phylogenetic distribution of Alu DNA repeats: irreversible events in the evolution of primates. J Mol Biol. 1999 Jun 18;289(4):861–871. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jurka J., Klonowski P. Integration of retroposable elements in mammals: selection of target sites. J Mol Evol. 1996 Dec;43(6):685–689. doi: 10.1007/BF02202117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jurka J., Klonowski P., Trifonov E. N. Mammalian retroposons integrate at kinkable DNA sites. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1998 Feb;15(4):717–721. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1998.10508987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kapitonov V., Jurka J. The age of Alu subfamilies. J Mol Evol. 1996 Jan;42(1):59–65. doi: 10.1007/BF00163212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M. Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):454–458. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leeflang E. P., Liu W. M., Hashimoto C., Choudary P. V., Schmid C. W. Phylogenetic evidence for multiple Alu source genes. J Mol Evol. 1992 Jul;35(1):7–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00160256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miyamoto M. M. Molecular systematics: Perfect SINEs of evolutionary history? Curr Biol. 1999 Nov 4;9(21):R816–R819. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80498-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murata S., Takasaki N., Saitoh M., Okada N. Determination of the phylogenetic relationships among Pacific salmonids by using short interspersed elements (SINEs) as temporal landmarks of evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 1;90(15):6995–6999. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.6995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nikaido M., Rooney A. P., Okada N. Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interpersed elements: hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 31;96(18):10261–10266. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Okada N. SINEs. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1991 Dec;1(4):498–504. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80198-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Purvis A. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 29;348(1326):405–421. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Quentin Y. The Alu family developed through successive waves of fixation closely connected with primate lineage history. J Mol Evol. 1988;27(3):194–202. doi: 10.1007/BF02100074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ryan S. C., Dugaiczyk A. Newly arisen DNA repeats in primate phylogeny. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(23):9360–9364. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmid C. W. Alu: structure, origin, evolution, significance and function of one-tenth of human DNA. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1996;53:283–319. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60148-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shedlock A. M., Okada N. SINE insertions: powerful tools for molecular systematics. Bioessays. 2000 Feb;22(2):148–160. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200002)22:2<148::AID-BIES6>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shoshani J., Groves C. P., Simons E. L., Gunnell G. F. Primate phylogeny: morphological vs. molecular results. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1996 Feb;5(1):102–154. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D. G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zietkiewicz E., Richer C., Labuda D. Phylogenetic affinities of tarsier in the context of primate Alu repeats. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999 Feb;11(1):77–83. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zietkiewicz E., Richer C., Sinnett D., Labuda D. Monophyletic origin of Alu elements in primates. J Mol Evol. 1998 Aug;47(2):172–182. doi: 10.1007/pl00006374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES