Abstract
An approach to the optimal utilization of marker and pedigree information in minimizing the rates of inbreeding and genetic drift at the average locus of the genome (not just the marked loci) in a small diploid population is proposed, and its efficiency is investigated by stochastic simulations. The approach is based on estimating the expected pedigree of each chromosome by using marker and individual pedigree information and minimizing the average coancestry of selected chromosomes by quadratic integer programming. It is shown that the approach is much more effective and much less computer demanding in implementation than previous ones. For pigs with 10 offspring per mother genotyped for two markers (each with four alleles at equal initial frequency) per chromosome of 100 cM, the approach can increase the average effective size for the whole genome by approximately 40 and 55% if mating ratios (the number of females mated with a male) are 3 and 12, respectively, compared with the corresponding values obtained by optimizing between-family selection using pedigree information only. The efficiency of the marker-assisted selection method increases with increasing amount of marker information (number of markers per chromosome, heterozygosity per marker) and family size, but decreases with increasing genome size. For less prolific species, the approach is still effective if the mating ratio is large so that a high marker-assisted selection pressure on the rarer sex can be maintained.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (174.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Caballero A. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity (Edinb) 1994 Dec;73(Pt 6):657–679. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1994.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caballero A., Toro M. A. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genet Res. 2000 Jun;75(3):331–343. doi: 10.1017/s0016672399004449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frankham R. Conservation genetics. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:305–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.001513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nejati-Javaremi A., Smith C., Gibson J. P. Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. J Anim Sci. 1997 Jul;75(7):1738–1745. doi: 10.2527/1997.7571738x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Hill W. G. Marker-assisted selection to increase effective population size by reducing Mendelian segregation variance. Genetics. 2000 Jan;154(1):475–489. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.1.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J. More efficient breeding systems for controlling inbreeding and effective size in animal populations. Heredity (Edinb) 1997 Dec;79(Pt 6):591–599. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1997.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]