Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 May;158(1):413–422. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.1.413

Dissecting the genetic pathway to extreme fruit size in tomato using a cross between the small-fruited wild species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium and L. esculentum var. Giant Heirloom.

Z Lippman 1, S D Tanksley 1
PMCID: PMC1461635  PMID: 11333249

Abstract

In an effort to determine the genetic basis of exceptionally large tomato fruits, QTL analysis was performed on a population derived from a cross between the wild species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (average fruit weight, 1 g) and the L. esculentum cultivar var. Giant Heirloom, which bears fruit in excess of 1000 g. QTL analysis revealed that the majority (67%) of phenotypic variation in fruit size could be attributed to six major loci localized on chromosomes 1-3 and 11. None of the QTL map to novel regions of the genome-all have been reported in previous studies involving moderately sized tomatoes. This result suggests that no major QTL beyond those already reported were involved in the evolution of extremely large fruit. However, this is the first time that all six QTL have emerged in a single population, suggesting that exceptionally large-fruited varieties, such as Giant Heirloom, are the result of a novel combination of preexisting QTL alleles. One of the detected QTL, fw2.2, has been cloned and exerts its effect on fruit size through global control of cell division early in carpel/fruit development. However, the most significant QTL detected in this study (fw11.3, lcn11.1) maps to the bottom of chromosome 11 and seems to exert its effect on fruit size through control of carpel/locule number. A second major locus, also affecting carpel number (and hence fruit size), was mapped to chromosome 2 (fw2.1, lcn2.1). We propose that these two carpel number QTL correspond to the loci described by early classical geneticists as fasciated (f) and locule number (lc), respectively.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (284.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernatzky R., Tanksley S. D. Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics. 1986 Apr;112(4):887–898. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FOGLE H. W., CURRENCE T. M. Inheritance of fruit weight and earliness in a tomato cross. Genetics. 1950 May;35(3):363–380. doi: 10.1093/genetics/35.3.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frary A., Nesbitt T. C., Grandillo S., Knaap E., Cong B., Liu J., Meller J., Elber R., Alpert K. B., Tanksley S. D. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science. 2000 Jul 7;289(5476):85–88. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5476.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gillaspy G., Ben-David H., Gruissem W. Fruits: A Developmental Perspective. Plant Cell. 1993 Oct;5(10):1439–1451. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.10.1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):185–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lander E. S., Green P., Abrahamson J., Barlow A., Daly M. J., Lincoln S. E., Newberg L. A., Newburg L. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics. 1987 Oct;1(2):174–181. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Macarthur J W, Butler L. Size Inheritance and Geometric Growth Processes in the Tomato Fruit. Genetics. 1938 May;23(3):253–268. doi: 10.1093/genetics/23.3.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Paterson A. H., Lander E. S., Hewitt J. D., Peterson S., Lincoln S. E., Tanksley S. D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):721–726. doi: 10.1038/335721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pelaz S., Ditta G. S., Baumann E., Wisman E., Yanofsky M. F. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):200–203. doi: 10.1038/35012103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tanksley S. D., Ganal M. W., Prince J. P., de Vicente M. C., Bonierbale M. W., Broun P., Fulton T. M., Giovannoni J. J., Grandillo S., Martin G. B. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1141–1160. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES