Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 May;158(1):109–122. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.1.109

Fidelity of mitotic double-strand-break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a role for SAE2/COM1.

A J Rattray 1, C B McGill 1, B K Shafer 1, J N Strathern 1
PMCID: PMC1461648  PMID: 11333222

Abstract

Errors associated with the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) include point mutations caused by misincorporation during repair DNA synthesis or novel junctions made by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). We previously demonstrated that DNA synthesis is approximately 100-fold more error prone when associated with DSB repair. Here we describe a genetic screen for mutants that affect the fidelity of DSB repair. The substrate consists of inverted repeats of the trp1 and CAN1 genes. Recombinational repair of a site-specific DSB within the repeat yields TRP1 recombinants. Errors in the repair process can be detected by the production of canavanine-resistant (can1) mutants among the TRP1 recombinants. In wild-type cells the recombinational repair process is efficient and fairly accurate. Errors resulting in can1 mutations occur in <1% of the TRP1 recombinants and most appear to be point mutations. We isolated several mutant strains with altered fidelity of recombination. Here we characterize one of these mutants that revealed an approximately 10-fold elevation in the frequency of can1 mutants among TRP1 recombinants. The gene was cloned by complementation of a coincident sporulation defect and proved to be an allele of SAE2/COM1. Physical analysis of the can1 mutants from sae2/com1 strains revealed that many were a novel class of chromosome rearrangement that could reflect break-induced replication (BIR) and NHEJ. Strains with either the mre11s-H125N or rad50s-K81I alleles had phenotypes in this assay that are similar to that of the sae2/com1Delta strain. Our data suggest that Sae2p/Com1p plays a role in ensuring that both ends of a DSB participate in a recombination event, thus avoiding BIR, possibly by regulating the nuclease activity of the Mre11p/Rad50p/Xrs2p complex.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (504.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alani E., Cao L., Kleckner N. A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics. 1987 Aug;116(4):541–545. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.541.test. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alani E., Padmore R., Kleckner N. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell. 1990 May 4;61(3):419–436. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90524-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bi X., Liu L. F. DNA rearrangement mediated by inverted repeats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 23;93(2):819–823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.2.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boeke J. D., Trueheart J., Natsoulis G., Fink G. R. 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol. 1987;154:164–175. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)54076-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borde V., Goldman A. S., Lichten M. Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. Science. 2000 Oct 27;290(5492):806–809. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5492.806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosco G., Haber J. E. Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture. Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1037–1047. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Butler D. K., Yasuda L. E., Yao M. C. Induction of large DNA palindrome formation in yeast: implications for gene amplification and genome stability in eukaryotes. Cell. 1996 Dec 13;87(6):1115–1122. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81805-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chlebowicz E., Jachymczyk W. J. Repair of MMS-induced DNA double-strand breaks in haploid cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which requires the presence of a duplicate genome. Mol Gen Genet. 1979 Jan 2;167(3):279–286. doi: 10.1007/BF00267420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Colaiácovo M. P., Pâques F., Haber J. E. Removal of one nonhomologous DNA end during gene conversion by a RAD1- and MSH2-independent pathway. Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1409–1423. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Derbyshire M. K., Epstein L. H., Young C. S., Munz P. L., Fishel R. Nonhomologous recombination in human cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):156–169. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Embretson J. E., Livingston D. M. A plasmid model to study genetic recombination in yeast. Gene. 1984 Sep;29(3):293–302. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90058-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Esposito M. S., Bruschi C. V. Diploid yeast cells yield homozygous spontaneous mutations. Curr Genet. 1993 May-Jun;23(5-6):430–434. doi: 10.1007/BF00312630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fried M., Feo S., Heard E. The role of inverted duplication in the generation of gene amplification in mammalian cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Oct 8;1090(2):143–155. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(91)90095-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goulian M., Richards S. H., Heard C. J., Bigsby B. M. Discontinuous DNA synthesis by purified mammalian proteins. J Biol Chem. 1990 Oct 25;265(30):18461–18471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grenson M., Mousset M., Wiame J. M., Bechet J. Multiplicity of the amino acid permeases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Evidence for a specific arginine-transporting system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Oct 31;127(2):325–338. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(66)90387-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harrington J. J., Lieber M. R. Functional domains within FEN-1 and RAD2 define a family of structure-specific endonucleases: implications for nucleotide excision repair. Genes Dev. 1994 Jun 1;8(11):1344–1355. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.11.1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hinnen A., Hicks J. B., Fink G. R. Transformation of yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Apr;75(4):1929–1933. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.4.1929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoffman C. S., Winston F. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1987;57(2-3):267–272. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Holbeck S. L., Strathern J. N. A role for REV3 in mutagenesis during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1017–1024. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hopfner K. P., Karcher A., Shin D. S., Craig L., Arthur L. M., Carney J. P., Tainer J. A. Structural biology of Rad50 ATPase: ATP-driven conformational control in DNA double-strand break repair and the ABC-ATPase superfamily. Cell. 2000 Jun 23;101(7):789–800. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80890-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kunes S., Botstein D., Fox M. S. Synapsis-mediated fusion of free DNA ends forms inverted dimer plasmids in yeast. Genetics. 1990 Jan;124(1):67–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kunes S., Botstein D., Fox M. S. Transformation of yeast with linearized plasmid DNA. Formation of inverted dimers and recombinant plasmid products. J Mol Biol. 1985 Aug 5;184(3):375–387. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90288-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lengauer C., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 1998 Dec 17;396(6712):643–649. doi: 10.1038/25292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lyu Y. L., Lin C. T., Liu L. F. Inversion/dimerization of plasmids mediated by inverted repeats. J Mol Biol. 1999 Jan 29;285(4):1485–1501. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Magni G E, Von Borstel R C. Different Rates of Spontaneous Mutation during Mitosis and Meiosis in Yeast. Genetics. 1962 Aug;47(8):1097–1108. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.8.1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Malkova A., Ivanov E. L., Haber J. E. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):7131–7136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Malone R. E., Esposito R. E. The RAD52 gene is required for homothallic interconversion of mating types and spontaneous mitotic recombination in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jan;77(1):503–507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.1.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McClintock B. The Behavior in Successive Nuclear Divisions of a Chromosome Broken at Meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1939 Aug;25(8):405–416. doi: 10.1073/pnas.25.8.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McGill C. B., Holbeck S. L., Strathern J. N. The chromosome bias of misincorporations during double-strand break repair is not altered in mismatch repair-defective strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998 Apr;148(4):1525–1533. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.4.1525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McGill C. B., Shafer B. K., Derr L. K., Strathern J. N. Recombination initiated by double-strand breaks. Curr Genet. 1993;23(4):305–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00310891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McKee A. H., Kleckner N. A general method for identifying recessive diploid-specific mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its application to the isolation of mutants blocked at intermediate stages of meiotic prophase and characterization of a new gene SAE2. Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):797–816. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Moore I. K., Martin M. P., Dorsey M. J., Paquin C. E. Formation of circular amplifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a breakage-fusion-bridge mechanism. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2000;36(2):113–120. doi: 10.1002/1098-2280(2000)36:2<113::aid-em5>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moreau S., Ferguson J. R., Symington L. S. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Jan;19(1):556–566. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.1.556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nickoloff J. A., Chen E. Y., Heffron F. A 24-base-pair DNA sequence from the MAT locus stimulates intergenic recombination in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7831–7835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Prinz S., Amon A., Klein F. Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):781–795. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Reagan M. S., Pittenger C., Siede W., Friedberg E. C. Characterization of a mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a deletion of the RAD27 gene, a structural homolog of the RAD2 nucleotide excision repair gene. J Bacteriol. 1995 Jan;177(2):364–371. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.2.364-371.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Resnick M. A., Martin P. The repair of double-strand breaks in the nuclear DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its genetic control. Mol Gen Genet. 1976 Jan 16;143(2):119–129. doi: 10.1007/BF00266917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Resnick M. A. The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J Theor Biol. 1976 Jun;59(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sharples G. J., Leach D. R. Structural and functional similarities between the SbcCD proteins of Escherichia coli and the RAD50 and MRE11 (RAD32) recombination and repair proteins of yeast. Mol Microbiol. 1995 Sep;17(6):1215–1217. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17061215_1.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sommers C. H., Miller E. J., Dujon B., Prakash S., Prakash L. Conditional lethality of null mutations in RTH1 that encodes the yeast counterpart of a mammalian 5'- to 3'-exonuclease required for lagging strand DNA synthesis in reconstituted systems. J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 3;270(9):4193–4196. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.9.4193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Strathern J. N., Klar A. J., Hicks J. B., Abraham J. A., Ivy J. M., Nasmyth K. A., McGill C. Homothallic switching of yeast mating type cassettes is initiated by a double-stranded cut in the MAT locus. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):183–192. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90418-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Symington L. S. Double-strand-break repair and recombination catalyzed by a nuclear extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1991 Apr;10(4):987–996. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08033.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tishkoff D. X., Filosi N., Gaida G. M., Kolodner R. D. A novel mutation avoidance mechanism dependent on S. cerevisiae RAD27 is distinct from DNA mismatch repair. Cell. 1997 Jan 24;88(2):253–263. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81846-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsubouchi H., Ogawa H. A novel mre11 mutation impairs processing of double-strand breaks of DNA during both mitosis and meiosis. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jan;18(1):260–268. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.1.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Turchi J. J., Huang L., Murante R. S., Kim Y., Bambara R. A. Enzymatic completion of mammalian lagging-strand DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 11;91(21):9803–9807. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Whelan W. L., Gocke E., Manney T. R. The CAN1 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: fine-structure analysis and forward mutation rates. Genetics. 1979 Jan;91(1):35–51. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES