Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Jul;158(3):1137–1145. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.3.1137

Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster.

P C Phillips 1, M C Whitlock 1, K Fowler 1
PMCID: PMC1461705  PMID: 11454762

Abstract

The pattern of genetic covariation among traits (the G matrix) plays a central role in determining the pattern of evolutionary change from both natural selection and random genetic drift. Here we measure the effect of genetic drift on the shape of the G matrix using a large data set on the inheritance of wing characteristics in Drosophila melanogaster. Fifty-two inbred lines with a total of 4680 parent-offspring families were generated by one generation of brother-sister mating and compared to an outbred control population of 1945 families. In keeping with the theoretical expectation for a correlated set of additively determined traits, the average G matrix of the inbred lines remained proportional to the outbred control G matrix with a proportionality constant approximately equal to (1 - F), where F is the inbreeding coefficient. Further, the pattern of covariance among the means of the inbred lines induced by inbreeding was also proportional to the within-line G matrix of the control population with a constant very close to the expectation of 2F. Although the average G of the inbred lines did not show change in overall structure relative to the outbred controls, separate analysis revealed a great deal of variation among inbred lines around this expectation, including changes in the sign of genetic correlations. Since any given line can be quite different from the outbred control, it is likely that in nature unreplicated drift will lead to changes in the G matrix. Thus, the shape of G is malleable under genetic drift, and the evolutionary response of any particular population is likely to depend on the specifics of its evolutionary history.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (152.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avery P. J., Hill W. G. Variability in genetic parameters among small populations. Genet Res. 1977 Jun;29(3):193–213. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300017286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Badyaev A. V., Hill G. E. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the house finch. I. Population divergence in morphological covariance structure. Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1784–1794. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00722.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barton N. H., Turelli M. Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genet Res. 1987 Apr;49(2):157–173. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fowler K., Whitlock M. C. The variance in inbreeding depression and the recovery of fitness in bottlenecked populations. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Oct 22;266(1433):2061–2066. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harshman LG, Hoffmann AA. Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us? Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jan;15(1):32–36. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01756-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lande R. The Genetic Covariance between Characters Maintained by Pleiotropic Mutations. Genetics. 1980 Jan;94(1):203–215. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.1.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lande R. The genetic correlation between characters maintained by selection, linkage and inbreeding. Genet Res. 1984 Dec;44(3):309–320. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lynch M. Design and analysis of experiments on random drift and inbreeding depression. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):791–807. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. REEVE E. C. R. A discussion on the measurement of growth and form; genetical aspects of size allometry. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1950 Nov;137(889):515–518. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1950.0062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roff D. The evolution of the G matrix: selection or drift? Heredity (Edinb) 2000 Feb;84(Pt 2):135–142. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00695.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Whitlock M. C., Fowler K. The changes in genetic and environmental variance with inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1999 May;152(1):345–353. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.1.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zeng Z. B., Cockerham C. C. Variance of neutral genetic variances within and between populations for a quantitative character. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):535–553. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zimmerman E., Palsson A., Gibson G. Quantitative trait loci affecting components of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):671–683. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES