Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Jul;158(3):1013–1025. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.3.1013

The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution.

J E Novak 1, P B Ross-Macdonald 1, G S Roeder 1
PMCID: PMC1461720  PMID: 11454751

Abstract

The budding yeast MSH4 gene encodes a MutS homolog produced specifically in meiotic cells. Msh4 is not required for meiotic mismatch repair or gene conversion, but it is required for wild-type levels of crossing over. Here, we show that a msh4 null mutation substantially decreases crossover interference. With respect to the defect in interference and the level of crossing over, msh4 is similar to the zip1 mutant, which lacks a structural component of the synaptonemal complex (SC). Furthermore, epistasis tests indicate that msh4 and zip1 affect the same subset of meiotic crossovers. In the msh4 mutant, SC formation is delayed compared to wild type, and full synapsis is achieved in only about half of all nuclei. The simultaneous defects in synapsis and interference observed in msh4 (and also zip1 and ndj1/tam1) suggest a role for the SC in mediating interference. The Msh4 protein localizes to discrete foci on meiotic chromosomes and colocalizes with Zip2, a protein involved in the initiation of chromosome synapsis. Both Zip2 and Zip1 are required for the normal localization of Msh4 to chromosomes, raising the possibility that the zip1 and zip2 defects in crossing over are indirect, resulting from the failure to localize Msh4 properly.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (349.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agarwal S., Roeder G. S. Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell. 2000 Jul 21;102(2):245–255. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00029-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alani E., Lee S., Kane M. F., Griffith J., Kolodner R. D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2, a mispaired base recognition protein, also recognizes Holliday junctions in DNA. J Mol Biol. 1997 Jan 24;265(3):289–301. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bocker T., Barusevicius A., Snowden T., Rasio D., Guerrette S., Robbins D., Schmidt C., Burczak J., Croce C. M., Copeland T. hMSH5: a human MutS homologue that forms a novel heterodimer with hMSH4 and is expressed during spermatogenesis. Cancer Res. 1999 Feb 15;59(4):816–822. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chu S., DeRisi J., Eisen M., Mulholland J., Botstein D., Brown P. O., Herskowitz I. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science. 1998 Oct 23;282(5389):699–705. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5389.699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chua P. R., Roeder G. S. Tam1, a telomere-associated meiotic protein, functions in chromosome synapsis and crossover interference. Genes Dev. 1997 Jul 15;11(14):1786–1800. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.14.1786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chua P. R., Roeder G. S. Zip2, a meiosis-specific protein required for the initiation of chromosome synapsis. Cell. 1998 May 1;93(3):349–359. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81164-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Conrad M. N., Dominguez A. M., Dresser M. E. Ndj1p, a meiotic telomere protein required for normal chromosome synapsis and segregation in yeast. Science. 1997 May 23;276(5316):1252–1255. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5316.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong H., Roeder G. S. Organization of the yeast Zip1 protein within the central region of the synaptonemal complex. J Cell Biol. 2000 Feb 7;148(3):417–426. doi: 10.1083/jcb.148.3.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Edelmann W., Cohen P. E., Kneitz B., Winand N., Lia M., Heyer J., Kolodner R., Pollard J. W., Kucherlapati R. Mammalian MutS homologue 5 is required for chromosome pairing in meiosis. Nat Genet. 1999 Jan;21(1):123–127. doi: 10.1038/5075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Egel-Mitani M., Olson L. W., Egel R. Meiosis in Aspergillus nidulans: another example for lacking synaptonemal complexes in the absence of crossover interference. Hereditas. 1982;97(2):179–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1982.tb00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Egel R. Synaptonemal complex and crossing-over: structural support or interference? Heredity (Edinb) 1978 Oct;41(2):233–237. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1978.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Engebrecht J., Roeder G. S. MER1, a yeast gene required for chromosome pairing and genetic recombination, is induced in meiosis. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2379–2389. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fiorentini P., Huang K. N., Tishkoff D. X., Kolodner R. D., Symington L. S. Exonuclease I of Saccharomyces cerevisiae functions in mitotic recombination in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 May;17(5):2764–2773. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.5.2764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Foss E. J., Stahl F. W. A test of a counting model for chiasma interference. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1201–1209. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Foss E., Lande R., Stahl F. W., Steinberg C. M. Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):681–691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Havekes F. W., de Jong J. H., Heyting C., Ramanna M. S. Synapsis and chiasma formation in four meiotic mutants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Chromosome Res. 1994 Jul;2(4):315–325. doi: 10.1007/BF01552725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Her C., Doggett N. A. Cloning, structural characterization, and chromosomal localization of the human orthologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH5 gene. Genomics. 1998 Aug 15;52(1):50–61. doi: 10.1006/geno.1998.5374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hollingsworth N. M., Ponte L., Halsey C. MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 1995 Jul 15;9(14):1728–1739. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.14.1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang K. N., Symington L. S. A 5'-3' exonuclease from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for in vitro recombination between linear DNA molecules with overlapping homology. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jun;13(6):3125–3134. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.6.3125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hunter N., Borts R. H. Mlh1 is unique among mismatch repair proteins in its ability to promote crossing-over during meiosis. Genes Dev. 1997 Jun 15;11(12):1573–1582. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.12.1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaback D. B., Barber D., Mahon J., Lamb J., You J. Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic reciprocal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of crossover interference. Genetics. 1999 Aug;152(4):1475–1486. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kane S. M., Roth R. Carbohydrate metabolism during ascospore development in yeast. J Bacteriol. 1974 Apr;118(1):8–14. doi: 10.1128/jb.118.1.8-14.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Khazanehdari K. A., Borts R. H. EXO1 and MSH4 differentially affect crossing-over and segregation. Chromosoma. 2000;109(1-2):94–102. doi: 10.1007/s004120050416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kilmartin J. V., Wright B., Milstein C. Rat monoclonal antitubulin antibodies derived by using a new nonsecreting rat cell line. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):576–582. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kirkpatrick D. T., Ferguson J. R., Petes T. D., Symington L. S. Decreased meiotic intergenic recombination and increased meiosis I nondisjunction in exo1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1549–1557. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kleckner N. Meiosis: how could it work? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8167–8174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kneitz B., Cohen P. E., Avdievich E., Zhu L., Kane M. F., Hou H., Jr, Kolodner R. D., Kucherlapati R., Pollard J. W., Edelmann W. MutS homolog 4 localization to meiotic chromosomes is required for chromosome pairing during meiosis in male and female mice. Genes Dev. 2000 May 1;14(9):1085–1097. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kolodner R. D., Marsischky G. T. Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999 Feb;9(1):89–96. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)80013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Loidl J., Klein F., Scherthan H. Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast. J Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;125(6):1191–1200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.6.1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maguire M. P. Crossover site determination and interference. J Theor Biol. 1988 Oct 21;134(4):565–570. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Marsischky G. T., Lee S., Griffith J., Kolodner R. D. 'Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2/6 complex interacts with Holliday junctions and facilitates their cleavage by phage resolution enzymes. J Biol Chem. 1999 Mar 12;274(11):7200–7206. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.11.7200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Modrich P. DNA mismatch correction. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:435–466. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.002251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nakagawa T., Datta A., Kolodner R. D. Multiple functions of MutS- and MutL-related heterocomplexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Dec 7;96(25):14186–14188. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.25.14186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Olson L. W., Zimmermann F. K. Meiotic recombination and synaptonemal complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1978 Oct 30;166(2):151–159. doi: 10.1007/BF00285917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Papazian H P. The Analysis of Tetrad Data. Genetics. 1952 Mar;37(2):175–188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/37.2.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Paquis-Flucklinger V., Santucci-Darmanin S., Paul R., Saunières A., Turc-Carel C., Desnuelle C. Cloning and expression analysis of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog: the human MSH4 gene. Genomics. 1997 Sep 1;44(2):188–194. doi: 10.1006/geno.1997.4857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pochart P., Woltering D., Hollingsworth N. M. Conserved properties between functionally distinct MutS homologs in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1997 Nov 28;272(48):30345–30349. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.48.30345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rockmill B., Sym M., Scherthan H., Roeder G. S. Roles for two RecA homologs in promoting meiotic chromosome synapsis. Genes Dev. 1995 Nov 1;9(21):2684–2695. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.21.2684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Roeder G. S., Bailis J. M. The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet. 2000 Sep;16(9):395–403. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02080-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Roeder G. S. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 1997 Oct 15;11(20):2600–2621. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.20.2600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ross-Macdonald P., Roeder G. S. Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell. 1994 Dec 16;79(6):1069–1080. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ross-Macdonald P., Sheehan A., Roeder G. S., Snyder M. A multipurpose transposon system for analyzing protein production, localization, and function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 7;94(1):190–195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.1.190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Snow R. Maximum likelihood estimation of linkage and interference from tetrad data. Genetics. 1979 May;92(1):231–245. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.1.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Storlazzi A., Xu L., Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Synaptonemal complex (SC) component Zip1 plays a role in meiotic recombination independent of SC polymerization along the chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 20;93(17):9043–9048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.9043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sym M., Engebrecht J. A., Roeder G. S. ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell. 1993 Feb 12;72(3):365–378. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90114-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sym M., Roeder G. S. Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):283–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90197-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tishkoff D. X., Boerger A. L., Bertrand P., Filosi N., Gaida G. M., Kane M. F., Kolodner R. D. Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae EXO1, a gene encoding an exonuclease that interacts with MSH2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 8;94(14):7487–7492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tsubouchi H., Ogawa H. Exo1 roles for repair of DNA double-strand breaks and meiotic crossing over in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2000 Jul;11(7):2221–2233. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.7.2221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tung K. S., Hong E. J., Roeder G. S. The pachytene checkpoint prevents accumulation and phosphorylation of the meiosis-specific transcription factor Ndt80. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):12187–12192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.220464597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tung K. S., Roeder G. S. Meiotic chromosome morphology and behavior in zip1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998 Jun;149(2):817–832. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.2.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Usui T., Ohta T., Oshiumi H., Tomizawa J., Ogawa H., Ogawa T. Complex formation and functional versatility of Mre11 of budding yeast in recombination. Cell. 1998 Nov 25;95(5):705–716. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81640-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wach A., Brachat A., Pöhlmann R., Philippsen P. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1994 Dec;10(13):1793–1808. doi: 10.1002/yea.320101310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang T. F., Kleckner N., Hunter N. Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Nov 23;96(24):13914–13919. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Winand N. J., Panzer J. A., Kolodner R. D. Cloning and characterization of the human and Caenorhabditis elegans homologs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH5 gene. Genomics. 1998 Oct 1;53(1):69–80. doi: 10.1006/geno.1998.5447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Xu L., Ajimura M., Padmore R., Klein C., Kleckner N. NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Dec;15(12):6572–6581. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.12.6572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zalevsky J., MacQueen A. J., Duffy J. B., Kemphues K. J., Villeneuve A. M. Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. Genetics. 1999 Nov;153(3):1271–1283. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.3.1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. de Vries S. S., Baart E. B., Dekker M., Siezen A., de Rooij D. G., de Boer P., te Riele H. Mouse MutS-like protein Msh5 is required for proper chromosome synapsis in male and female meiosis. Genes Dev. 1999 Mar 1;13(5):523–531. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.5.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES