Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1996 Oct 1;24(19):3670–3676. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.19.3670

The central pseudoknot in 16S ribosomal RNA is needed for ribosome stability but is not essential for 30S initiation complex formation.

R A Poot 1, C W Pleij 1, J van Duin 1
PMCID: PMC146175  PMID: 8871543

Abstract

To examine the function of the central pseudoknot in 16S rRNA, we have studied Escherichia coli 30S subunits with the A18 mutation in this structure element. Previously, this mutation, which changes the central base pair of helix 2, C18--G917, to an A18xG917 mismatch, was shown to inhibit translation in vivo and a defect in initiation was suggested. Here, we find that the mutant 30S particles are impaired in forming 70S tight couples and predominantly accumulate as free 30S subunits. Formation of a 30S initiation complex, as measured by toeprinting, was almost as efficient for mutant 30S subunits, derived from the tight couple fraction, as for the wild-type control. However, the A18 mutation has a profound effect on the overall stability of the subunit. The mutant ribosomes were inactivated by affinity chromatography and high salt treatment, due to easy loss of ribosomal proteins. Accordingly, the particles could be reactivated by partial in vitro reconstitution with 30S ribosomal proteins. Mutant 30S subunits from the free subunit fraction were already inactive upon isolation, but could also be reactivated by reconstitution. Apparently, the inactivity in initiation of these mutant 30S subunits is, at least in part, also due to the lack of essential ribosomal proteins. We conclude that disruption of helix 2 of the central pseudoknot by itself does not affect the formation of a 30S initiation complex. We suggest that the in vivo translational defect of the mutant ribosomes is caused by their inability to form 70S initiation complexes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Backendorf C., Ravensbergen C. J., Van der Plas J., van Boom J. H., Veeneman G., Van Duin J. Basepairing potential of the 3' terminus of 16S RNA: dependence on the functional state of the 30S subunit and the presence of protein S21. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Mar 25;9(6):1425–1444. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.6.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baudin F., Mougel M., Romby P., Eyermann F., Ebel J. P., Ehresmann B., Ehresmann C. Probing the phosphates of the Escherichia coli ribosomal 16S RNA in its naked form, in the 30S subunit, and in the 70S ribosome. Biochemistry. 1989 Jul 11;28(14):5847–5855. doi: 10.1021/bi00440a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boni I. V., Isaeva D. M., Musychenko M. L., Tzareva N. V. Ribosome-messenger recognition: mRNA target sites for ribosomal protein S1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Jan 11;19(1):155–162. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brimacombe R., Atmadja J., Stiege W., Schüler D. A detailed model of the three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA in situ in the 30 S subunit. J Mol Biol. 1988 Jan 5;199(1):115–136. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90383-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brink M. F., Verbeet M. P., de Boer H. A. Formation of the central pseudoknot in 16S rRNA is essential for initiation of translation. EMBO J. 1993 Oct;12(10):3987–3996. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06076.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gutell R. R., Larsen N., Woese C. R. Lessons from an evolving rRNA: 16S and 23S rRNA structures from a comparative perspective. Microbiol Rev. 1994 Mar;58(1):10–26. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.1.10-26.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gutell R. R., Noller H. F., Woese C. R. Higher order structure in ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 1986 May;5(5):1111–1113. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04330.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hartz D., McPheeters D. S., Gold L. Influence of mRNA determinants on translation initiation in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1991 Mar 5;218(1):83–97. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90875-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hartz D., McPheeters D. S., Traut R., Gold L. Extension inhibition analysis of translation initiation complexes. Methods Enzymol. 1988;164:419–425. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(88)64058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacob W. F., Santer M., Dahlberg A. E. A single base change in the Shine-Dalgarno region of 16S rRNA of Escherichia coli affects translation of many proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jul;84(14):4757–4761. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.14.4757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Krieg P. A., Melton D. A. In vitro RNA synthesis with SP6 RNA polymerase. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:397–415. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55027-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LEBOY P. S., COX E. C., FLAKS J. G. THE CHROMOSOMAL SITE SPECIFYING A RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN IN ESCHERICHIA COLI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Dec;52:1367–1374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.6.1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McCarthy J. E., Gualerzi C. Translational control of prokaryotic gene expression. Trends Genet. 1990 Mar;6(3):78–85. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90098-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Neefs J. M., Van de Peer Y., De Rijk P., Chapelle S., De Wachter R. Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jul 1;21(13):3025–3049. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.13.3025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Neefs J. M., Van de Peer Y., Hendriks L., De Wachter R. Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Apr 25;18 (Suppl):2237–2317. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.suppl.2237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pinard R., Côté M., Payant C., Brakier-Gingras L. Positions 13 and 914 in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA are involved in the control of translational accuracy. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Feb 25;22(4):619–624. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.4.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pinard R., Payant C., Brakier-Gingras L. Mutations at positions 13 and/or 914 in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA interfere with the initiation of protein synthesis. Biochemistry. 1995 Jul 25;34(29):9611–9616. doi: 10.1021/bi00029a038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pinard R., Payant C., Melançon P., Brakier-Gingras L. The 5' proximal helix of 16S rRNA is involved in the binding of streptomycin to the ribosome. FASEB J. 1993 Jan;7(1):173–176. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.7.1.7678560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pleij C. W., Rietveld K., Bosch L. A new principle of RNA folding based on pseudoknotting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Mar 11;13(5):1717–1731. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.5.1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Poot R. A., Brink M. F., Pleij C. W., de Boer H. A., van Duin J. Separation of mutant and wild-type ribosomes based on differences in their anti Shine-Dalgarno sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Nov 25;21(23):5398–5402. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.23.5398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Powers T., Noller H. F. A functional pseudoknot in 16S ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 1991 Aug;10(8):2203–2214. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07756.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sigmund C. D., Ettayebi M., Borden A., Morgan E. A. Antibiotic resistance mutations in ribosomal RNA genes of Escherichia coli. Methods Enzymol. 1988;164:673–690. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(88)64077-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sigmund C. D., Ettayebi M., Morgan E. A. Antibiotic resistance mutations in 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jun 11;12(11):4653–4663. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.11.4653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stern S., Weiser B., Noller H. F. Model for the three-dimensional folding of 16 S ribosomal RNA. J Mol Biol. 1988 Nov 20;204(2):447–481. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90588-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Triman K., Becker E., Dammel C., Katz J., Mori H., Douthwaite S., Yapijakis C., Yoast S., Noller H. F. Isolation of temperature-sensitive mutants of 16 S rRNA in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1989 Oct 20;209(4):645–653. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)92000-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Dieijen G., Van Der Laken C. J., Van Knippenberg P. H., Van Duin J. Function of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 in translation of natural and synthetic messenger RNA. J Mol Biol. 1975 Apr 15;93(3):351–366. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90282-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Duin J., Wijnands R. The function of ribosomal protein S21 in protein synthesis. Eur J Biochem. 1981 Sep 1;118(3):615–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05563.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Van de Peer Y., Van den Broeck I., De Rijk P., De Wachter R. Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Sep;22(17):3488–3494. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.17.3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vila A., Viril-Farley J., Tapprich W. E. Pseudoknot in the central domain of small subunit ribosomal RNA is essential for translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Nov 8;91(23):11148–11152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.23.11148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Woese C. R., Gutell R. R. Evidence for several higher order structural elements in ribosomal RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(9):3119–3122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.9.3119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zamir A., Miskin R., Vogel Z., Elson D. The inactivation and reactivation of Escherichia coli ribosomes. Methods Enzymol. 1974;30:406–426. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(74)30042-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. van Dieijen G., van Knippenberg P. H., van Duin J. The specific role of ribosomal protein S1 in the recognition of native phage RNA. Eur J Biochem. 1976 May 1;64(2):511–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb10330.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES