Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Aug;158(4):1457–1476. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.4.1457

Meiotic recombination involving heterozygous large insertions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: formation and repair of large, unpaired DNA loops.

H M Kearney 1, D T Kirkpatrick 1, J L Gerton 1, T D Petes 1
PMCID: PMC1461752  PMID: 11514439

Abstract

Meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves the formation of heteroduplexes, duplexes containing DNA strands derived from two different homologues. If the two strands of DNA differ by an insertion or deletion, the heteroduplex will contain an unpaired DNA loop. We found that unpaired loops as large as 5.6 kb can be accommodated within a heteroduplex. Repair of these loops involved the nucleotide excision repair (NER) enzymes Rad1p and Rad10p and the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins Msh2p and Msh3p, but not several other NER (Rad2p and Rad14p) and MMR (Msh4p, Msh6p, Mlh1p, Pms1p, Mlh2p, Mlh3p) proteins. Heteroduplexes were also formed with DNA strands derived from alleles containing two different large insertions, creating a large "bubble"; repair of this substrate was dependent on Rad1p. Although meiotic recombination events in yeast are initiated by double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), we showed that DSBs occurring within heterozygous insertions do not stimulate interhomologue recombination.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (355.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams D. E., West S. C. Bypass of DNA heterologies during RuvAB-mediated three- and four-strand branch migration. J Mol Biol. 1996 Nov 8;263(4):582–596. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alani E., Padmore R., Kleckner N. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell. 1990 May 4;61(3):419–436. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90524-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardwell A. J., Bardwell L., Tomkinson A. E., Friedberg E. C. Specific cleavage of model recombination and repair intermediates by the yeast Rad1-Rad10 DNA endonuclease. Science. 1994 Sep 30;265(5181):2082–2085. doi: 10.1126/science.8091230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cao L., Alani E., Kleckner N. A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990 Jun 15;61(6):1089–1101. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90072-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carpenter A. T. Mismatch repair, gene conversion, and crossing-over in two recombination-defective mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Oct;79(19):5961–5965. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.19.5961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carpenter A. T. Recombination nodules and synaptonemal complex in recombination-defective females of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 1979;75(3):259–292. doi: 10.1007/BF00293472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen W., Jinks-Robertson S. The role of the mismatch repair machinery in regulating mitotic and meiotic recombination between diverged sequences in yeast. Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1299–1313. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clikeman J. A., Wheeler S. L., Nickoloff J. A. Efficient incorporation of large (>2 kb) heterologies into heteroduplex DNA: Pms1/Msh2-dependent and -independent large loop mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1481–1491. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Datta A., Adjiri A., New L., Crouse G. F., Jinks Robertson S. Mitotic crossovers between diverged sequences are regulated by mismatch repair proteins in Saccaromyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Mar;16(3):1085–1093. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.3.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Detloff P., White M. A., Petes T. D. Analysis of a gene conversion gradient at the HIS4 locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):113–123. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Devlin C., Tice-Baldwin K., Shore D., Arndt K. T. RAP1 is required for BAS1/BAS2- and GCN4-dependent transcription of the yeast HIS4 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jul;11(7):3642–3651. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fan Q. Q., Xu F., White M. A., Petes T. D. Competition between adjacent meiotic recombination hotspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1997 Mar;145(3):661–670. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.3.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fan Q., Xu F., Petes T. D. Meiosis-specific double-strand DNA breaks at the HIS4 recombination hot spot in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: control in cis and trans. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Mar;15(3):1679–1688. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.3.1679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Feldmann H., Winnacker E. L. A putative homologue of the human autoantigen Ku from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 15;268(17):12895–12900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fink G. R., Styles C. A. Gene conversion of deletions in the his4 region of yeast. Genetics. 1974 Jun;77(2):231–244. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.2.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fishman-Lobell J., Haber J. E. Removal of nonhomologous DNA ends in double-strand break recombination: the role of the yeast ultraviolet repair gene RAD1. Science. 1992 Oct 16;258(5081):480–484. doi: 10.1126/science.1411547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fleck O., Lehmann E., Schär P., Kohli J. Involvement of nucleotide-excision repair in msh2 pms1-independent mismatch repair. Nat Genet. 1999 Mar;21(3):314–317. doi: 10.1038/6838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Flores-Rozas H., Kolodner R. D. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLH3 gene functions in MSH3-dependent suppression of frameshift mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Oct 13;95(21):12404–12409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldstein A. L., McCusker J. H. Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1999 Oct;15(14):1541–1553. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199910)15:14<1541::AID-YEA476>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Harfe B. D., Jinks-Robertson S. DNA mismatch repair and genetic instability. Annu Rev Genet. 2000;34:359–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Harfe B. D., Minesinger B. K., Jinks-Robertson S. Discrete in vivo roles for the MutL homologs Mlh2p and Mlh3p in the removal of frameshift intermediates in budding yeast. Curr Biol. 2000 Feb 10;10(3):145–148. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00314-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harrington J. J., Lieber M. R. Functional domains within FEN-1 and RAD2 define a family of structure-specific endonucleases: implications for nucleotide excision repair. Genes Dev. 1994 Jun 1;8(11):1344–1355. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.11.1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Harrington J. J., Lieber M. R. The characterization of a mammalian DNA structure-specific endonuclease. EMBO J. 1994 Mar 1;13(5):1235–1246. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06373.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hollingsworth N. M., Ponte L., Halsey C. MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 1995 Jul 15;9(14):1728–1739. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.14.1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hunter N., Borts R. H. Mlh1 is unique among mismatch repair proteins in its ability to promote crossing-over during meiosis. Genes Dev. 1997 Jun 15;11(12):1573–1582. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.12.1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hunter N., Chambers S. R., Louis E. J., Borts R. H. The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. EMBO J. 1996 Apr 1;15(7):1726–1733. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Keeney S., Giroux C. N., Kleckner N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell. 1997 Feb 7;88(3):375–384. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81876-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Khazanehdari K. A., Borts R. H. EXO1 and MSH4 differentially affect crossing-over and segregation. Chromosoma. 2000;109(1-2):94–102. doi: 10.1007/s004120050416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kirkpatrick D. T., Dominska M., Petes T. D. Conversion-type and restoration-type repair of DNA mismatches formed during meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):1693–1705. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kirkpatrick D. T., Ferguson J. R., Petes T. D., Symington L. S. Decreased meiotic intergenic recombination and increased meiosis I nondisjunction in exo1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1549–1557. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kirkpatrick D. T., Petes T. D. Repair of DNA loops involves DNA-mismatch and nucleotide-excision repair proteins. Nature. 1997 Jun 26;387(6636):929–931. doi: 10.1038/43225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kirkpatrick D. T. Roles of the DNA mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair proteins during meiosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999 Mar;55(3):437–449. doi: 10.1007/s000180050300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kolodner R. D., Marsischky G. T. Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999 Feb;9(1):89–96. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)80013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Leem S. H., Ropp P. A., Sugino A. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase IV: possible involvement in double strand break DNA repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Aug 11;22(15):3011–3017. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.15.3011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lichten M., Borts R. H., Haber J. E. Meiotic gene conversion and crossing over between dispersed homologous sequences occurs frequently in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1987 Feb;115(2):233–246. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.2.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Matsunaga T., Park C. H., Bessho T., Mu D., Sancar A. Replication protein A confers structure-specific endonuclease activities to the XPF-ERCC1 and XPG subunits of human DNA repair excision nuclease. J Biol Chem. 1996 May 10;271(19):11047–11050. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.19.11047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McKnight G. L., Cardillo T. S., Sherman F. An extensive deletion causing overproduction of yeast iso-2-cytochrome c. Cell. 1981 Aug;25(2):409–419. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moore H., Greenwell P. W., Liu C. P., Arnheim N., Petes T. D. Triplet repeats form secondary structures that escape DNA repair in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1504–1509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Morel P., Stasiak A., Ehrlich S. D., Cassuto E. Effect of length and location of heterologous sequences on RecA-mediated strand exchange. J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 5;269(31):19830–19835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Murante R. S., Huang L., Turchi J. J., Bambara R. A. The calf 5'- to 3'-exonuclease is also an endonuclease with both activities dependent on primers annealed upstream of the point of cleavage. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jan 14;269(2):1191–1196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nag D. K., Petes T. D. Seven-base-pair inverted repeats in DNA form stable hairpins in vivo in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):669–673. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nag D. K., White M. A., Petes T. D. Palindromic sequences in heteroduplex DNA inhibit mismatch repair in yeast. Nature. 1989 Jul 27;340(6231):318–320. doi: 10.1038/340318a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nagylaki T., Petes T. D. Intrachromosomal gene conversion and the maintenance of sequence homogeneity among repeated genes. Genetics. 1982 Feb;100(2):315–337. doi: 10.1093/genetics/100.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nairz K., Klein F. mre11S--a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev. 1997 Sep 1;11(17):2272–2290. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.17.2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nicholson A., Hendrix M., Jinks-Robertson S., Crouse G. F. Regulation of mitotic homeologous recombination in yeast. Functions of mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair genes. Genetics. 2000 Jan;154(1):133–146. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Perkins D. D. Biochemical Mutants in the Smut Fungus Ustilago Maydis. Genetics. 1949 Sep;34(5):607–626. doi: 10.1093/genetics/34.5.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Porter S. E., White M. A., Petes T. D. Genetic evidence that the meiotic recombination hotspot at the HIS4 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not represent a site for a symmetrically processed double-strand break. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):5–19. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Prakash L., Dumais D., Polakowska R., Perozzi G., Prakash S. Molecular cloning of the RAD10 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1985;34(1):55–61. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90294-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Prakash S., Sung P., Prakash L. DNA repair genes and proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:33–70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.000341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Prinz S., Amon A., Klein F. Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):781–795. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Prolla T. A., Christie D. M., Liskay R. M. Dual requirement in yeast DNA mismatch repair for MLH1 and PMS1, two homologs of the bacterial mutL gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):407–415. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Pukkila P. J., Stephens M. D., Binninger D. M., Errede B. Frequency and directionality of gene conversion events involving the CYC7-H3 mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1986 Oct;114(2):347–361. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Reagan M. S., Pittenger C., Siede W., Friedberg E. C. Characterization of a mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a deletion of the RAD27 gene, a structural homolog of the RAD2 nucleotide excision repair gene. J Bacteriol. 1995 Jan;177(2):364–371. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.2.364-371.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Roeder G. S. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 1997 Oct 15;11(20):2600–2621. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.20.2600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ross-Macdonald P., Roeder G. S. Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell. 1994 Dec 16;79(6):1069–1080. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rothstein R. J. One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:202–211. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Saparbaev M., Prakash L., Prakash S. Requirement of mismatch repair genes MSH2 and MSH3 in the RAD1-RAD10 pathway of mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1996 Mar;142(3):727–736. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.3.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sekelsky J. J., McKim K. S., Chin G. M., Hawley R. S. The Drosophila meiotic recombination gene mei-9 encodes a homologue of the yeast excision repair protein Rad1. Genetics. 1995 Oct;141(2):619–627. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.2.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Selva E. M., New L., Crouse G. F., Lahue R. S. Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1175–1188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sia E. A., Jinks-Robertson S., Petes T. D. Genetic control of microsatellite stability. Mutat Res. 1997 Jan 31;383(1):61–70. doi: 10.1016/s0921-8777(96)00046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sia E. A., Kokoska R. J., Dominska M., Greenwell P., Petes T. D. Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on repeat unit size and DNA mismatch repair genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 May;17(5):2851–2858. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.5.2851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sommers C. H., Miller E. J., Dujon B., Prakash S., Prakash L. Conditional lethality of null mutations in RTH1 that encodes the yeast counterpart of a mammalian 5'- to 3'-exonuclease required for lagging strand DNA synthesis in reconstituted systems. J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 3;270(9):4193–4196. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.9.4193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stapleton A., Petes T. D. The Tn3 beta-lactamase gene acts as a hotspot for meiotic recombination in yeast. Genetics. 1991 Jan;127(1):39–51. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sugawara N., Pâques F., Colaiácovo M., Haber J. E. Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 and Msh3 repair proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9214–9219. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sun H., Treco D., Szostak J. W. Extensive 3'-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90270-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Tran H. T., Gordenin D. A., Resnick M. A. The prevention of repeat-associated deletions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mismatch repair depends on size and origin of deletions. Genetics. 1996 Aug;143(4):1579–1587. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Vincent A., Petes T. D. Mitotic and meiotic gene conversion of Ty elements and other insertions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Aug;122(4):759–772. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.4.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wach A., Brachat A., Pöhlmann R., Philippsen P. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1994 Dec;10(13):1793–1808. doi: 10.1002/yea.320101310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wang T. F., Kleckner N., Hunter N. Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Nov 23;96(24):13914–13919. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. White M. A., Wierdl M., Detloff P., Petes T. D. DNA-binding protein RAP1 stimulates meiotic recombination at the HIS4 locus in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9755–9759. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Woodgate R. A plethora of lesion-replicating DNA polymerases. Genes Dev. 1999 Sep 1;13(17):2191–2195. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.17.2191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wu T. C., Lichten M. Factors that affect the location and frequency of meiosis-induced double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):55–66. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Xu L., Kleckner N. Sequence non-specific double-strand breaks and interhomolog interactions prior to double-strand break formation at a meiotic recombination hot spot in yeast. EMBO J. 1995 Oct 16;14(20):5115–5128. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00194.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. de Laat W. L., Appeldoorn E., Jaspers N. G., Hoeijmakers J. H. DNA structural elements required for ERCC1-XPF endonuclease activity. J Biol Chem. 1998 Apr 3;273(14):7835–7842. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.14.7835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. de Laat W. L., Appeldoorn E., Sugasawa K., Weterings E., Jaspers N. G., Hoeijmakers J. H. DNA-binding polarity of human replication protein A positions nucleases in nucleotide excision repair. Genes Dev. 1998 Aug 15;12(16):2598–2609. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.16.2598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES