Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Nov;159(3):1259–1269. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.3.1259

The distribution of early recombination nodules on zygotene bivalents from plants.

L K Anderson 1, K D Hooker 1, S M Stack 1
PMCID: PMC1461850  PMID: 11729167

Abstract

Early recombination nodules (ENs) are protein complexes approximately 100 nm in diameter that are associated with forming synaptonemal complexes (SCs) during leptotene and zygotene of meiosis. Although their functions are not yet clear, ENs may have roles in synapsis and recombination. Here we report on the frequency and distribution of ENs in zygotene SC spreads from six plant species that include one lower vascular plant, two dicots, and three monocots. For each species, the number of ENs per unit length is higher for SC segments than for (asynapsed) axial elements (AEs). In addition, EN number is strongly correlated with SC segment length. There are statistically significant differences in EN frequencies on SCs between species, but these differences are not related to genome size, number of chromosomes, or phylogenetic class. There is no difference in the frequency of ENs per unit length of SC from early to late zygotene. The distribution of distances between adjacent ENs on SC segments is random for all six species, but ENs are found at synaptic forks more often than expected for a random distribution of ENs on SCs. From these observations, we conclude that in plants: (1) some ENs bind to AEs prior to synapsis, (2) most ENs bind to forming SCs at synaptic forks, and (3) ENs do not bind to already formed SCs.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agarwal S., Roeder G. S. Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell. 2000 Jul 21;102(2):245–255. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00029-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allers T., Lichten M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell. 2001 Jul 13;106(1):47–57. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00416-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson L. K., Offenberg H. H., Verkuijlen W. M., Heyting C. RecA-like proteins are components of early meiotic nodules in lily. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jun 24;94(13):6868–6873. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson L. K., Stack S. M., Fox M. H., Zhang C. S. The relationship between genome size and synaptonemal complex length in higher plants. Exp Cell Res. 1985 Feb;156(2):367–378. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(85)90544-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashley T., Plug A. W., Xu J., Solari A. J., Reddy G., Golub E. I., Ward D. C. Dynamic changes in Rad51 distribution on chromatin during meiosis in male and female vertebrates. Chromosoma. 1995 Oct;104(1):19–28. doi: 10.1007/BF00352222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashley T., Plug A. Caught in the act: deducing meiotic function from protein immunolocalization. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1998;37:201–239. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60175-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carpenter A. T. Electron microscopy of meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females: II. The recombination nodule--a recombination-associated structure at pachytene? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Aug;72(8):3186–3189. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.3186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpenter A. T. Gene conversion, recombination nodules, and the initiation of meiotic synapsis. Bioessays. 1987 May;6(5):232–236. doi: 10.1002/bies.950060510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carpenter A. T. Synaptonemal complex and recombination nodules in wild-type Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):511–541. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dresser M. E., Ewing D. J., Conrad M. N., Dominguez A. M., Barstead R., Jiang H., Kodadek T. DMC1 functions in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiotic pathway that is largely independent of the RAD51 pathway. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):533–544. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Franklin A. E., McElver J., Sunjevaric I., Rothstein R., Bowen B., Cande W. Z. Three-dimensional microscopy of the Rad51 recombination protein during meiotic prophase. Plant Cell. 1999 May;11(5):809–824. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.5.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Freire R., Murguía J. R., Tarsounas M., Lowndes N. F., Moens P. B., Jackson S. P. Human and mouse homologs of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad1(+) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD17: linkage to checkpoint control and mammalian meiosis. Genes Dev. 1998 Aug 15;12(16):2560–2573. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.16.2560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lichten M., Goldman A. S. Meiotic recombination hotspots. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:423–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.002231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Maguire M. P. Evidence on the stage of heat induced crossover effect in maize. Genetics. 1968 Oct;60(2):353–362. doi: 10.1093/genetics/60.2.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moens P. B., Chen D. J., Shen Z., Kolas N., Tarsounas M., Heng H. H., Spyropoulos B. Rad51 immunocytology in rat and mouse spermatocytes and oocytes. Chromosoma. 1997 Sep;106(4):207–215. doi: 10.1007/s004120050241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Moens P. B., Freire R., Tarsounas M., Spyropoulos B., Jackson S. P. Expression and nuclear localization of BLM, a chromosome stability protein mutated in Bloom's syndrome, suggest a role in recombination during meiotic prophase. J Cell Sci. 2000 Feb;113(Pt 4):663–672. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.4.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Plug A. W., Peters A. H., Keegan K. S., Hoekstra M. F., de Boer P., Ashley T. Changes in protein composition of meiotic nodules during mammalian meiosis. J Cell Sci. 1998 Feb;111(Pt 4):413–423. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.4.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pâques F., Haber J. E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Jun;63(2):349–404. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rasmussen S. W., Holm P. B. Mechanics of meiosis. Hereditas. 1980;93(2):187–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1980.tb01360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rockmill B., Sym M., Scherthan H., Roeder G. S. Roles for two RecA homologs in promoting meiotic chromosome synapsis. Genes Dev. 1995 Nov 1;9(21):2684–2695. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.21.2684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Roeder G. S. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 1997 Oct 15;11(20):2600–2621. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.20.2600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Romanienko P. J., Camerini-Otero R. D. The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol Cell. 2000 Nov;6(5):975–987. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00097-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Santucci-Darmanin S., Walpita D., Lespinasse F., Desnuelle C., Ashley T., Paquis-Flucklinger V. MSH4 acts in conjunction with MLH1 during mammalian meiosis. FASEB J. 2000 Aug;14(11):1539–1547. doi: 10.1096/fj.14.11.1539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sherman J. D., Herickhoff L. A., Stack S. M. Silver staining two types of meiotic nodules. Genome. 1992 Dec;35(6):907–915. doi: 10.1139/g92-140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sherman J. D., Stack S. M. Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. VI. High-resolution recombination nodule map for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Genetics. 1995 Oct;141(2):683–708. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.2.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tarsounas M., Morita T., Pearlman R. E., Moens P. B. RAD51 and DMC1 form mixed complexes associated with mouse meiotic chromosome cores and synaptonemal complexes. J Cell Biol. 1999 Oct 18;147(2):207–220. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.2.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Terasawa M., Shinohara A., Hotta Y., Ogawa H., Ogawa T. Localization of RecA-like recombination proteins on chromosomes of the lily at various meiotic stages. Genes Dev. 1995 Apr 15;9(8):925–934. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.8.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zalevsky J., MacQueen A. J., Duffy J. B., Kemphues K. J., Villeneuve A. M. Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. Genetics. 1999 Nov;153(3):1271–1283. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.3.1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zickler D., Kleckner N. The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis. Annu Rev Genet. 1998;32:619–697. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zickler D., Moreau P. J., Huynh A. D., Slezec A. M. Correlation between pairing initiation sites, recombination nodules and meiotic recombination in Sordaria macrospora. Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):135–148. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. von Wettstein D., Rasmussen S. W., Holm P. B. The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Annu Rev Genet. 1984;18:331–413. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.18.120184.001555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES