Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Dec;159(4):1833–1844. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.4.1833

Recombination, balancing selection and phylogenies in MHC and self-incompatibility genes.

M H Schierup 1, A M Mikkelsen 1, J Hein 1
PMCID: PMC1461893  PMID: 11779818

Abstract

Using a coalescent model of multiallelic balancing selection with recombination, the genealogical process as a function of recombinational distance from a site under selection is investigated. We find that the shape of the phylogenetic tree is independent of the distance to the site under selection. Only the timescale changes from the value predicted by Takahata's allelic genealogy at the site under selection, converging with increasing recombination to the timescale of the neutral coalescent. However, if nucleotide sequences are simulated over a recombining region containing a site under balancing selection, a phylogenetic tree constructed while ignoring such recombination is strongly affected. This is true even for small rates of recombination. Published studies of multiallelic balancing selection, i.e., the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) of vertebrates, gametophytic and sporophytic self-incompatibility of plants, and incompatibility of fungi, all observe allelic genealogies with unexpected shapes. We conclude that small absolute levels of recombination are compatible with these observed distortions of the shape of the allelic genealogy, suggesting a possible cause of these observations. Furthermore, we illustrate that the variance in the coalescent with recombination process makes it difficult to locate sites under selection and to estimate the selection coefficient from levels of variability.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (140.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Awadalla P., Charlesworth D. Recombination and selection at Brassica self-incompatibility loci. Genetics. 1999 May;152(1):413–425. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.1.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Awadalla P., Eyre-Walker A., Smith J. M. Linkage disequilibrium and recombination in hominid mitochondrial DNA. Science. 1999 Dec 24;286(5449):2524–2525. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5449.2524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayala F. J. The myth of Eve: molecular biology and human origins. Science. 1995 Dec 22;270(5244):1930–1936. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5244.1930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergström T. F., Josefsson A., Erlich H. A., Gyllensten U. Recent origin of HLA-DRB1 alleles and implications for human evolution. Nat Genet. 1998 Mar;18(3):237–242. doi: 10.1038/ng0398-237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casselman A. L., Vrebalov J., Conner J. A., Singhal A., Giovannoni J., Nasrallah M. E., Nasrallah J. B. Determining the physical limits of the Brassica S locus by recombinational analysis. Plant Cell. 2000 Jan;12(1):23–33. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dwyer K. G., Balent M. A., Nasrallah J. B., Nasrallah M. E. DNA sequences of self-incompatibility genes from Brassica campestris and B. oleracea: polymorphism predating speciation. Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Mar;16(3):481–486. doi: 10.1007/BF00024000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Emerson S. A Preliminary Survey of the Oenothera Organensis Population. Genetics. 1939 Jun;24(4):524–537. doi: 10.1093/genetics/24.4.524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Griffiths R. C., Marjoram P. Ancestral inference from samples of DNA sequences with recombination. J Comput Biol. 1996 Winter;3(4):479–502. doi: 10.1089/cmb.1996.3.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):831–840. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hudson R. R. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Apr;23(2):183–201. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hughes A. L., Nei M. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):167–170. doi: 10.1038/335167a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kusaba M., Nishio T., Satta Y., Hinata K., Ockendon D. Striking sequence similarity in inter- and intra-specific comparisons of class I SLG alleles from Brassica oleracea and Brassica campestris: implications for the evolution and recognition mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 8;94(14):7673–7678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. May G., Shaw F., Badrane H., Vekemans X. The signature of balancing selection: fungal mating compatibility gene evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 3;96(16):9172–9177. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Richman A. D., Kao T. H., Schaeffer S. W., Uyenoyama M. K. S-allele sequence diversity in natural populations of Solanum carolinense (Horsenettle). Heredity (Edinb) 1995 Oct;75(Pt 4):405–415. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1995.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Richman A. D., Kohn J. R. Self-incompatibility alleles from Physalis: implications for historical inference from balanced genetic polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 5;96(1):168–172. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.1.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Richman A. D., Uyenoyama M. K., Kohn J. R. S-allele diversity in a natural population of Physalis crassifolia (Solanaceae) (ground cherry) assessed by RT-PCR. Heredity (Edinb) 1996 May;76(Pt 5):497–505. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1996.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schierup M. H., Hein J. Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis. Genetics. 2000 Oct;156(2):879–891. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.2.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schierup M. H., Mable B. K., Awadalla P., Charlesworth D. Identification and characterization of a polymorphic receptor kinase gene linked to the self-incompatibility locus of Arabidopsis lyrata. Genetics. 2001 May;158(1):387–399. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schierup M. H., Vekemans X., Christiansen F. B. Allelic genealogies in sporophytic self-incompatibility systems in plants. Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1187–1198. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schierup M. H., Vekemans X., Christiansen F. B. Evolutionary dynamics of sporophytic self-incompatibility alleles in plants. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):835–846. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Seddon J. M., Baverstock P. R. Variation on islands: major histocompatibility complex (Mhc) polymorphism in populations of the Australian bush rat. Mol Ecol. 1999 Dec;8(12):2071–2079. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00822.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Takahata N. A simple genealogical structure of strongly balanced allelic lines and trans-species evolution of polymorphism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(7):2419–2423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Takahata N., Nei M. Allelic genealogy under overdominant and frequency-dependent selection and polymorphism of major histocompatibility complex loci. Genetics. 1990 Apr;124(4):967–978. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.4.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Takahata N., Satta Y., Klein J. Polymorphism and balancing selection at major histocompatibility complex loci. Genetics. 1992 Apr;130(4):925–938. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D. G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Uyenoyama M. K. Genealogical structure among alleles regulating self-incompatibility in natural populations of flowering plants. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1389–1400. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vekemans X., Slatkin M. Gene and allelic genealogies at a gametophytic self-incompatibility locus. Genetics. 1994 Aug;137(4):1157–1165. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.4.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wall J. D. A comparison of estimators of the population recombination rate. Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Jan;17(1):156–163. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang X., Hughes A. L., Tsukamoto T., Ando T., Kao T. Evidence that intragenic recombination contributes to allelic diversity of the S-RNase gene at the self-incompatibility (S) locus in Petunia inflata. Plant Physiol. 2001 Feb;125(2):1012–1022. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.2.1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wiuf C., Hein J. On the number of ancestors to a DNA sequence. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1459–1468. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES