Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Mar;160(3):1217–1229. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1217

A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data.

E C Anderson 1, E A Thompson 1
PMCID: PMC1462008  PMID: 11901135

Abstract

We present a statistical method for identifying species hybrids using data on multiple, unlinked markers. The method does not require that allele frequencies be known in the parental species nor that separate, pure samples of the parental species be available. The method is suitable for both markers with fixed allelic differences between the species and markers without fixed differences. The probability model used is one in which parentals and various classes of hybrids (F(1)'s, F(2)'s, and various backcrosses) form a mixture from which the sample is drawn. Using the framework of Bayesian model-based clustering allows us to compute, by Markov chain Monte Carlo, the posterior probability that each individual belongs to each of the distinct hybrid classes. We demonstrate the method on allozyme data from two species of hybridizing trout, as well as on two simulated data sets.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (229.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N. H. Estimating multilocus linkage disequilibria. Heredity (Edinb) 2000 Mar;84(Pt 3):373–389. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goodman S. J., Barton N. H., Swanson G., Abernethy K., Pemberton J. M. Introgression through rare hybridization: A genetic study of a hybrid zone between red and sika deer (genus Cervus) in Argyll, Scotland. Genetics. 1999 May;152(1):355–371. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.1.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McKeigue P. M. Mapping genes that underlie ethnic differences in disease risk: methods for detecting linkage in admixed populations, by conditioning on parental admixture. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jul;63(1):241–251. doi: 10.1086/301908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Miller L. M. Classifying genealogical origins in hybrid populations using dominant markers. J Hered. 2000 Jan-Feb;91(1):46–49. doi: 10.1093/jhered/91.1.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pritchard J. K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945–959. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rannala B., Mountain J. L. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9197–9201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wright S. The Distribution of Gene Frequencies Under Irreversible Mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1938 Jul;24(7):253–259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.24.7.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wright S. The Theoretical Variance within and among Subdivisions of a Population That Is in a Steady State. Genetics. 1952 May;37(3):312–321. doi: 10.1093/genetics/37.3.312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Young W. P., Ostberg C. O., Keim P., Thorgaard G. H. Genetic characterization of hybridization and introgression between anadromous rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus) and coastal cutthroat trout (O. clarki clarki). Mol Ecol. 2001 Apr;10(4):921–930. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01247.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES