Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Mar;160(3):891–908. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.891

UV irradiation causes the loss of viable mitotic recombinants in Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells lacking the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Fekret Osman 1, Irina R Tsaneva 1, Matthew C Whitby 1, Claudette L Doe 1
PMCID: PMC1462011  PMID: 11901109

Abstract

Elevated mitotic recombination and cell cycle delays are two of the cellular responses to UV-induced DNA damage. Cell cycle delays in response to DNA damage are mediated via checkpoint proteins. Two distinct DNA damage checkpoints have been characterized in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: an intra-S-phase checkpoint slows replication and a G(2)/M checkpoint stops cells passing from G(2) into mitosis. In this study we have sought to determine whether UV damage-induced mitotic intrachromosomal recombination relies on damage-induced cell cycle delays. The spontaneous and UV-induced recombination phenotypes were determined for checkpoint mutants lacking the intra-S and/or the G(2)/M checkpoint. Spontaneous mitotic recombinants are thought to arise due to endogenous DNA damage and/or intrinsic stalling of replication forks. Cells lacking only the intra-S checkpoint exhibited no UV-induced increase in the frequency of recombinants above spontaneous levels. Mutants lacking the G(2)/M checkpoint exhibited a novel phenotype; following UV irradiation the recombinant frequency fell below the frequency of spontaneous recombinants. This implies that, as well as UV-induced recombinants, spontaneous recombinants are also lost in G(2)/M mutants after UV irradiation. Therefore, as well as lack of time for DNA repair, loss of spontaneous and damage-induced recombinants also contributes to cell death in UV-irradiated G(2)/M checkpoint mutants.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (226.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aboussekhra A., Chanet R., Adjiri A., Fabre F. Semidominant suppressors of Srs2 helicase mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae map in the RAD51 gene, whose sequence predicts a protein with similarities to procaryotic RecA proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;12(7):3224–3234. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.3224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen J. B., Zhou Z., Siede W., Friedberg E. C., Elledge S. J. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 1994 Oct 15;8(20):2401–2415. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.20.2401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bashkirov V. I., King J. S., Bashkirova E. V., Schmuckli-Maurer J., Heyer W. D. DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Jun;20(12):4393–4404. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.12.4393-4404.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boddy M. N., Lopez-Girona A., Shanahan P., Interthal H., Heyer W. D., Russell P. Damage tolerance protein Mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Dec;20(23):8758–8766. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.23.8758-8766.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown K. D., Barlow C., Wynshaw-Boris A. Multiple ATM-dependent pathways: an explanation for pleiotropy. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;64(1):46–50. doi: 10.1086/302223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bénard M., Maric C., Pierron G. DNA replication-dependent formation of joint DNA molecules in Physarum polycephalum. Mol Cell. 2001 May;7(5):971–980. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00237-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cao J., DePrimo S. E., Stringer J. R. Cell cycle dependence of radiation-induced homologous recombination in cultured monkey cells. Mutat Res. 1997 Mar 21;374(2):233–243. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(96)00237-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caspari T., Carr A. M. DNA structure checkpoint pathways in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biochimie. 1999 Jan-Feb;81(1-2):173–181. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(99)80050-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen G., Yuan S. S., Liu W., Xu Y., Trujillo K., Song B., Cong F., Goff S. P., Wu Y., Arlinghaus R. Radiation-induced assembly of Rad51 and Rad52 recombination complex requires ATM and c-Abl. J Biol Chem. 1999 Apr 30;274(18):12748–12752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.18.12748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cole G. M., Schild D., Lovett S. T., Mortimer R. K. Regulation of RAD54- and RAD52-lacZ gene fusions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Mar;7(3):1078–1084. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.3.1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Doe C. L., Dixon J., Osman F., Whitby M. C. Partial suppression of the fission yeast rqh1(-) phenotype by expression of a bacterial Holliday junction resolvase. EMBO J. 2000 Jun 1;19(11):2751–2762. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.11.2751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elledge S. J. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science. 1996 Dec 6;274(5293):1664–1672. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fasullo M., Bennett T., AhChing P., Koudelik J. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint reduces the DNA damage-associated stimulation of directed translocations. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Mar;18(3):1190–1200. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.3.1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fasullo M., Koudelik J., AhChing P., Giallanza P., Cera C. Radiosensitive and mitotic recombination phenotypes of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae dun1 mutant defective in DNA damage-inducible gene expression. Genetics. 1999 Jul;152(3):909–919. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.3.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gangloff S., Soustelle C., Fabre F. Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases. Nat Genet. 2000 Jun;25(2):192–194. doi: 10.1038/76055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grossenbacher-Grunder A. M., Thuriaux P. Spontaneous and UV-induced recombination in radiation-sensitive mutants of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mutat Res. 1981 Mar;81(1):37–48. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(81)90085-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grushcow J. M., Holzen T. M., Park K. J., Weinert T., Lichten M., Bishop D. K. Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice. Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):607–620. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Haber J. E. DNA recombination: the replication connection. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999 Jul;24(7):271–275. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01413-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haber J. E. In vivo biochemistry: physical monitoring of recombination induced by site-specific endonucleases. Bioessays. 1995 Jul;17(7):609–620. doi: 10.1002/bies.950170707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jang Y. K., Jin Y. H., Myung K., Seong R. H., Hong S. H., Park S. D. Differential expression of the rhp51+ gene, a recA and RAD51 homolog from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Gene. 1996 Feb 22;169(1):125–130. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(96)83099-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kadyk L. C., Hartwell L. H. Replication-dependent sister chromatid recombination in rad1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):469–487. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kadyk L. C., Hartwell L. H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):387–402. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Klein H. L. Mutations in recombinational repair and in checkpoint control genes suppress the lethal combination of srs2Delta with other DNA repair genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2001 Feb;157(2):557–565. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.2.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liberi G., Chiolo I., Pellicioli A., Lopes M., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Foiani M. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 2000 Sep 15;19(18):5027–5038. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.18.5027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lindsay H. D., Griffiths D. J., Edwards R. J., Christensen P. U., Murray J. M., Osman F., Walworth N., Carr A. M. S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev. 1998 Feb 1;12(3):382–395. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.3.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C. S., Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):557–561. doi: 10.1038/35087613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lydall D., Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science. 1995 Dec 1;270(5241):1488–1491. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5241.1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Martinho R. G., Lindsay H. D., Flaggs G., DeMaggio A. J., Hoekstra M. F., Carr A. M., Bentley N. J. Analysis of Rad3 and Chk1 protein kinases defines different checkpoint responses. EMBO J. 1998 Dec 15;17(24):7239–7249. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.24.7239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Morrison C., Sonoda E., Takao N., Shinohara A., Yamamoto K., Takeda S. The controlling role of ATM in homologous recombinational repair of DNA damage. EMBO J. 2000 Feb 1;19(3):463–471. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.3.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Muris D. F., Vreeken K., Carr A. M., Broughton B. C., Lehmann A. R., Lohman P. H., Pastink A. Cloning the RAD51 homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Sep 25;21(19):4586–4591. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.19.4586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Muris D. F., Vreeken K., Carr A. M., Murray J. M., Smit C., Lohman P. H., Pastink A. Isolation of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe RAD54 homologue, rhp54+, a gene involved in the repair of radiation damage and replication fidelity. J Cell Sci. 1996 Jan;109(Pt 1):73–81. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Murray J. M., Lindsay H. D., Munday C. A., Carr A. M. Role of Schizosaccharomyces pombe RecQ homolog, recombination, and checkpoint genes in UV damage tolerance. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Dec;17(12):6868–6875. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.12.6868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. O'Connell M. J., Walworth N. C., Carr A. M. The G2-phase DNA-damage checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 2000 Jul;10(7):296–303. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01773-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Osman F., Adriance M., McCready S. The genetic control of spontaneous and UV-induced mitotic intrachromosomal recombination in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr Genet. 2000 Oct;38(3):113–125. doi: 10.1007/s002940000145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Osman F., Subramani S. Double-strand break-induced recombination in eukaryotes. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1998;58:263–299. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60039-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ostermann K., Lorentz A., Schmidt H. The fission yeast rad22 gene, having a function in mating-type switching and repair of DNA damages, encodes a protein homolog to Rad52 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Dec 25;21(25):5940–5944. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.25.5940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pati D., Keller C., Groudine M., Plon S. E. Reconstitution of a MEC1-independent checkpoint in yeast by expression of a novel human fork head cDNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jun;17(6):3037–3046. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.6.3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Russell P., Nurse P. cdc25+ functions as an inducer in the mitotic control of fission yeast. Cell. 1986 Apr 11;45(1):145–153. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90546-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Savitsky K., Sfez S., Tagle D. A., Ziv Y., Sartiel A., Collins F. S., Shiloh Y., Rotman G. The complete sequence of the coding region of the ATM gene reveals similarity to cell cycle regulators in different species. Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Nov;4(11):2025–2032. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.11.2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shim Y. S., Jang Y. K., Lim M. S., Lee J. S., Seong R. H., Hong S. H., Park S. D. Rdp1, a novel zinc finger protein, regulates the DNA damage response of rhp51(+) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Dec;20(23):8958–8968. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.23.8958-8968.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Stewart E., Chapman C. R., Al-Khodairy F., Carr A. M., Enoch T. rqh1+, a fission yeast gene related to the Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes, is required for reversible S phase arrest. EMBO J. 1997 May 15;16(10):2682–2692. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.10.2682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Stürzbecher H. W., Donzelmann B., Henning W., Knippschild U., Buchhop S. p53 is linked directly to homologous recombination processes via RAD51/RecA protein interaction. EMBO J. 1996 Apr 15;15(8):1992–2002. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Suto K., Nagata A., Murakami H., Okayama H. A double-strand break repair component is essential for S phase completion in fission yeast cell cycling. Mol Biol Cell. 1999 Oct;10(10):3331–3343. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.10.3331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Swanson R. L., Morey N. J., Doetsch P. W., Jinks-Robertson S. Overlapping specificities of base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, recombination, and translesion synthesis pathways for DNA base damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Apr;19(4):2929–2935. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.4.2929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tercero J. A., Diffley J. F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):553–557. doi: 10.1038/35087607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weinert T. DNA damage and checkpoint pathways: molecular anatomy and interactions with repair. Cell. 1998 Sep 4;94(5):555–558. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81597-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Weinert T., Lydall D. Cell cycle checkpoints, genetic instability and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 1993 Apr;4(2):129–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhou Z., Elledge S. J. DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell. 1993 Dec 17;75(6):1119–1127. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90321-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. al-Khodairy F., Carr A. M. DNA repair mutants defining G2 checkpoint pathways in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 1992 Apr;11(4):1343–1350. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05179.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. al-Khodairy F., Fotou E., Sheldrick K. S., Griffiths D. J., Lehmann A. R., Carr A. M. Identification and characterization of new elements involved in checkpoint and feedback controls in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 1994 Feb;5(2):147–160. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.2.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. van Gent D. C., Hoeijmakers J. H., Kanaar R. Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection. Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Mar;2(3):196–206. doi: 10.1038/35056049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES