Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Mar;160(3):1123–1131. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1123

Crossover interference in the mouse.

Karl W Broman 1, Lucy B Rowe 1, Gary A Churchill 1, Ken Paigen 1
PMCID: PMC1462020  PMID: 11901128

Abstract

We present an analysis of crossover interference in the mouse genome, on the basis of high-density genotype data from two reciprocal interspecific backcrosses, comprising 188 meioses. Overwhelming evidence was found for strong positive crossover interference with average strength greater than that implied by the Carter-Falconer map function. There was some evidence for interchromosomal variation in the level of interference, with smaller chromosomes exhibiting stronger interference. We further compared the observed numbers of crossovers to previous cytological observations on the numbers of chiasmata and evaluated evidence for the obligate chiasma hypothesis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (165.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blank R. D., Campbell G. R., Calabro A., D'Eustachio P. A linkage map of mouse chromosome 12: localization of Igh and effects of sex and interference on recombination. Genetics. 1988 Dec;120(4):1073–1083. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.4.1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Broman K. W., Murray J. C., Sheffield V. C., White R. L., Weber J. L. Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in recombination. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Sep;63(3):861–869. doi: 10.1086/302011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Broman K. W., Weber J. L. Characterization of human crossover interference. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 May 8;66(6):1911–1926. doi: 10.1086/302923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ceci J. D., Siracusa L. D., Jenkins N. A., Copeland N. G. A molecular genetic linkage map of mouse chromosome 4 including the localization of several proto-oncogenes. Genomics. 1989 Nov;5(4):699–709. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(89)90111-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chua P. R., Roeder G. S. Tam1, a telomere-associated meiotic protein, functions in chromosome synapsis and crossover interference. Genes Dev. 1997 Jul 15;11(14):1786–1800. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.14.1786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Egel R. The synaptonemal complex and the distribution of meiotic recombination events. Trends Genet. 1995 Jun;11(6):206–208. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89046-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foss E. J., Stahl F. W. A test of a counting model for chiasma interference. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1201–1209. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foss E., Lande R., Stahl F. W., Steinberg C. M. Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):681–691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hultén M. A., Tease C., Lawrie N. M. Chiasma-based genetic map of the mouse X chromosome. Chromosoma. 1995 Nov;104(3):223–227. doi: 10.1007/BF00352187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaback D. B., Barber D., Mahon J., Lamb J., You J. Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic reciprocal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of crossover interference. Genetics. 1999 Aug;152(4):1475–1486. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Karlin S., Liberman U. Theoretical recombination processes incorporating interference effects. Theor Popul Biol. 1994 Oct;46(2):198–231. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1994.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kingsley D. M., Jenkins N. A., Copeland N. G. A molecular genetic linkage map of mouse chromosome 9 with regional localizations for the Gsta, T3g, Ets-1 and Ldlr loci. Genetics. 1989 Sep;123(1):165–172. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lander E. S., Green P. Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(8):2363–2367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.8.2363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lawrie N. M., Tease C., Hultén M. A. Chiasma frequency, distribution and interference maps of mouse autosomes. Chromosoma. 1995 Dec;104(4):308–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00352262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lin S., Speed T. P. Incorporating crossover interference into pedigree analysis using the chi 2 model. Hum Hered. 1996 Nov-Dec;46(6):315–322. doi: 10.1159/000154371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McPeek M. S., Speed T. P. Modeling interference in genetic recombination. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1031–1044. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Munz P. An analysis of interference in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics. 1994 Jul;137(3):701–707. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.3.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Polani P. E. Centromere localization at meiosis and the position of chiasmata in the male and female mouse. Chromosoma. 1972;36(4):343–374. doi: 10.1007/BF00336793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roeder G. S. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 1997 Oct 15;11(20):2600–2621. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.20.2600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rowe L. B., Nadeau J. H., Turner R., Frankel W. N., Letts V. A., Eppig J. T., Ko M. S., Thurston S. J., Birkenmeier E. H. Maps from two interspecific backcross DNA panels available as a community genetic mapping resource. Mamm Genome. 1994 May;5(5):253–274. doi: 10.1007/BF00389540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sym M., Roeder G. S. Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):283–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90197-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weeks D. E., Ott J., Lathrop G. M. Detection of genetic interference: simulation studies and mouse data. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):1217–1226. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weinstein A. The Theory of Multiple-Strand Crossing over. Genetics. 1936 May;21(3):155–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/21.3.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yu K., Feingold E. Estimating the frequency distribution of crossovers during meiosis from recombination data. Biometrics. 2001 Jun;57(2):427–434. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00427.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhao H., McPeek M. S., Speed T. P. Statistical analysis of chromatid interference. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1057–1065. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhao H., Speed T. P., McPeek M. S. Statistical analysis of crossover interference using the chi-square model. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1045–1056. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhao H., Speed T. P. On genetic map functions. Genetics. 1996 Apr;142(4):1369–1377. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.4.1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES