Abstract
The nonparametric bootstrap approach is known to be suitable for calculating central confidence intervals for the locations of quantitative trait loci (QTL). However, the distribution of the bootstrap QTL position estimates along the chromosome is peaked at the positions of the markers and is not tailed equally. This results in conservativeness and large width of the confidence intervals. In this study three modified methods are proposed to calculate nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals for QTL locations, which compute noncentral confidence intervals (uncorrected method I), correct for the impact of the markers (weighted method I), or both (weighted method II). Noncentral confidence intervals were computed with an analog of the highest posterior density method. The correction for the markers is based on the distribution of QTL estimates along the chromosome when the QTL is not linked with any marker, and it can be obtained with a permutation approach. In a simulation study the three methods were compared with the original bootstrap method. The results showed that it is useful, first, to compute noncentral confidence intervals and, second, to correct the bootstrap distribution of the QTL estimates for the impact of the markers. The weighted method II, combining these two properties, produced the shortest and less biased confidence intervals in a large number of simulated configurations.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (129.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Churchill G. A., Doerge R. W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963–971. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conneally P. M., Edwards J. H., Kidd K. K., Lalouel J. M., Morton N. E., Ott J., White R. Report of the Committee on Methods of Linkage Analysis and Reporting. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1985;40(1-4):356–359. doi: 10.1159/000132186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darvasi A., Weinreb A., Minke V., Weller J. I., Soller M. Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):943–951. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haley C. S., Knott S. A. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Oct;69(4):315–324. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):185–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mangin B., Goffinet B., Rebaï A. Constructing confidence intervals for QTL location. Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):1301–1308. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Visscher P. M., Thompson R., Haley C. S. Confidence intervals in QTL mapping by bootstrapping. Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):1013–1020. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walling G. A., Visscher P. M., Andersson L., Rothschild M. F., Wang L., Moser G., Groenen M. A., Bidanel J. P., Cepica S., Archibald A. L. Combined analyses of data from quantitative trait loci mapping studies. Chromosome 4 effects on porcine growth and fatness. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1369–1378. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]