Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 May;161(1):231–247. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.1.231

The bereft gene, a potential target of the neural selector gene cut, contributes to bristle morphogenesis.

Kirsten E Hardiman 1, Rachel Brewster 1, Shaema M Khan 1, Monika Deo 1, Rolf Bodmer 1
PMCID: PMC1462110  PMID: 12019237

Abstract

The neural selector gene cut, a homeobox transcription factor, is required for the specification of the correct identity of external (bristle-type) sensory organs in Drosophila. Targets of cut function, however, have not been described. Here, we study bereft (bft) mutants, which exhibit loss or malformation of a majority of the interommatidial bristles of the eye and cause defects in other external sensory organs. These mutants were generated by excising a P element located at chromosomal location 33AB, the enhancer trap line E8-2-46, indicating that a gene near the insertion site is responsible for this phenotype. Similar to the transcripts of the gene nearest to the insertion, reporter gene expression of E8-2-46 coincides with Cut in the support cells of external sensory organs, which secrete the bristle shaft and socket. Although bft transcripts do not obviously code for a protein product, its expression is abolished in bft deletion mutants, and the integrity of the bft locus is required for (interommatidial) bristle morphogenesis. This suggests that disruption of the bft gene is the cause of the observed bristle phenotype. We also sought to determine what factors regulate the expression of bft and the enhancer trap line. The correct specification of individual external sensory organ cells involves not only cut, but also the lineage genes numb and tramtrack. We demonstrate that mutations of these three genes affect the expression levels at the bft locus. Furthermore, cut overexpression is sufficient to induce ectopic bft expression in the PNS and in nonneuronal epidermis. On the basis of these results, we propose that bft acts downstream of cut and tramtrack to implement correct bristle morphogenesis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (769.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams M. D., Celniker S. E., Holt R. A., Evans C. A., Gocayne J. D., Amanatides P. G., Scherer S. E., Li P. W., Hoskins R. A., Galle R. F. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000 Mar 24;287(5461):2185–2195. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amrein H., Axel R. Genes expressed in neurons of adult male Drosophila. Cell. 1997 Feb 21;88(4):459–469. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81886-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrés V., Chiara M. D., Mahdavi V. A new bipartite DNA-binding domain: cooperative interaction between the cut repeat and homeo domain of the cut homeo proteins. Genes Dev. 1994 Jan;8(2):245–257. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.2.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Awasaki T., Kimura K. Multiple function of poxn gene in larval PNS development and in adult appendage formation of Drosophila. Dev Genes Evol. 2001 Jan;211(1):20–29. doi: 10.1007/s004270000119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bier E., Vaessin H., Shepherd S., Lee K., McCall K., Barbel S., Ackerman L., Carretto R., Uemura T., Grell E. Searching for pattern and mutation in the Drosophila genome with a P-lacZ vector. Genes Dev. 1989 Sep;3(9):1273–1287. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.9.1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jack J., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Primary structure and expression of a product from cut, a locus involved in specifying sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):629–635. doi: 10.1038/333629a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Patterns of expression of cut, a protein required for external sensory organ development in wild-type and cut mutant Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1990 Aug;4(8):1322–1331. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.8.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blochlinger K., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Transformation of sensory organ identity by ectopic expression of Cut in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1124–1135. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bodmer R., Barbel S., Sheperd S., Jack J. W., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Transformation of sensory organs by mutations of the cut locus of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1987 Oct 23;51(2):293–307. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90156-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bodmer R., Carretto R., Jan Y. N. Neurogenesis of the peripheral nervous system in Drosophila embryos: DNA replication patterns and cell lineages. Neuron. 1989 Jul;3(1):21–32. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90112-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brewster R., Bodmer R. Origin and specification of type II sensory neurons in Drosophila. Development. 1995 Sep;121(9):2923–2936. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.9.2923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brewster R., Hardiman K., Deo M., Khan S., Bodmer R. The selector gene cut represses a neural cell fate that is specified independently of the Achaete-Scute-Complex and atonal. Mech Dev. 2001 Jul;105(1-2):57–68. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(01)00375-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brockdorff N., Ashworth A., Kay G. F., McCabe V. M., Norris D. P., Cooper P. J., Swift S., Rastan S. The product of the mouse Xist gene is a 15 kb inactive X-specific transcript containing no conserved ORF and located in the nucleus. Cell. 1992 Oct 30;71(3):515–526. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90519-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown C. J., Hendrich B. D., Rupert J. L., Lafrenière R. G., Xing Y., Lawrence J., Willard H. F. The human XIST gene: analysis of a 17 kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus. Cell. 1992 Oct 30;71(3):527–542. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90520-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brunet J. F., Ghysen A. Deconstructing cell determination: proneural genes and neuronal identity. Bioessays. 1999 Apr;21(4):313–318. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199904)21:4<313::AID-BIES7>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cagan R. L., Ready D. F. The emergence of order in the Drosophila pupal retina. Dev Biol. 1989 Dec;136(2):346–362. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(89)90261-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dye C. A., Lee J. K., Atkinson R. C., Brewster R., Han P. L., Bellen H. J. The Drosophila sanpodo gene controls sibling cell fate and encodes a tropomodulin homolog, an actin/tropomyosin-associated protein. Development. 1998 May;125(10):1845–1856. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.10.1845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Franke A., Baker B. S. The rox1 and rox2 RNAs are essential components of the compensasome, which mediates dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol Cell. 1999 Jul;4(1):117–122. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80193-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Frohman M. A. On beyond classic RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends). PCR Methods Appl. 1994 Aug;4(1):S40–S58. doi: 10.1101/gr.4.1.s40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gho M., Bellaïche Y., Schweisguth F. Revisiting the Drosophila microchaete lineage: a novel intrinsically asymmetric cell division generates a glial cell. Development. 1999 Aug;126(16):3573–3584. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.16.3573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gho M., Schweisguth F. Frizzled signalling controls orientation of asymmetric sense organ precursor cell divisions in Drosophila. Nature. 1998 May 14;393(6681):178–181. doi: 10.1038/30265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guo M., Bier E., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. tramtrack acts downstream of numb to specify distinct daughter cell fates during asymmetric cell divisions in the Drosophila PNS. Neuron. 1995 May;14(5):913–925. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90330-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Guo M., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Control of daughter cell fates during asymmetric division: interaction of Numb and Notch. Neuron. 1996 Jul;17(1):27–41. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80278-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hartenstein V., Posakony J. W. A dual function of the Notch gene in Drosophila sensillum development. Dev Biol. 1990 Nov;142(1):13–30. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(90)90147-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hartenstein V., Posakony J. W. Development of adult sensilla on the wing and notum of Drosophila melanogaster. Development. 1989 Oct;107(2):389–405. doi: 10.1242/dev.107.2.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Higashijima S., Michiue T., Emori Y., Saigo K. Subtype determination of Drosophila embryonic external sensory organs by redundant homeo box genes BarH1 and BarH2. Genes Dev. 1992 Jun;6(6):1005–1018. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jack J. W. Molecular organization of the cut locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):869–876. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90283-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. Polarity in cell division: what frames thy fearful asymmetry? Cell. 2000 Mar 17;100(6):599–602. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80695-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Knoblich J. A., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Asymmetric segregation of Numb and Prospero during cell division. Nature. 1995 Oct 19;377(6550):624–627. doi: 10.1038/377624a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lawrence P. A. Development and determination of hairs and bristles in the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Lygaeidae, Hemiptera). J Cell Sci. 1966 Dec;1(4):475–498. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1.4.475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu B., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Asymmetric cell division: lessons from flies and worms. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998 Aug;8(4):392–399. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80108-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Meller V. H., Wu K. H., Roman G., Kuroda M. I., Davis R. L. roX1 RNA paints the X chromosome of male Drosophila and is regulated by the dosage compensation system. Cell. 1997 Feb 21;88(4):445–457. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81885-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nepveu A. Role of the multifunctional CDP/Cut/Cux homeodomain transcription factor in regulating differentiation, cell growth and development. Gene. 2001 May 30;270(1-2):1–15. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00485-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Overton J. The fine structure of developing bristles in wild type and mutant Drosophila melanogaster. J Morphol. 1967 Aug;122(4):367–379. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051220406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Penny G. D., Kay G. F., Sheardown S. A., Rastan S., Brockdorff N. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature. 1996 Jan 11;379(6561):131–137. doi: 10.1038/379131a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Poole S. J., Kauvar L. M., Drees B., Kornberg T. The engrailed locus of Drosophila: structural analysis of an embryonic transcript. Cell. 1985 Jan;40(1):37–43. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90306-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Robertson H. M., Preston C. R., Phillis R. W., Johnson-Schlitz D. M., Benz W. K., Engels W. R. A stable genomic source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1988 Mar;118(3):461–470. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.3.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Spana E. P., Kopczynski C., Goodman C. S., Doe C. Q. Asymmetric localization of numb autonomously determines sibling neuron identity in the Drosophila CNS. Development. 1995 Nov;121(11):3489–3494. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.11.3489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tautz D., Pfeifle C. A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma. 1989 Aug;98(2):81–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00291041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Uemura T., Shepherd S., Ackerman L., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. numb, a gene required in determination of cell fate during sensory organ formation in Drosophila embryos. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):349–360. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90849-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vervoort M., Dambly-Chaudière C., Ghysen A. Cell fate determination in Drosophila. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997 Feb;7(1):21–28. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80116-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. White K., Grether M. E., Abrams J. M., Young L., Farrell K., Steller H. Genetic control of programmed cell death in Drosophila. Science. 1994 Apr 29;264(5159):677–683. doi: 10.1126/science.8171319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wightman B., Ha I., Ruvkun G. Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell. 1993 Dec 3;75(5):855–862. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90530-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zipursky S. L., Venkatesh T. R., Teplow D. B., Benzer S. Neuronal development in the Drosophila retina: monoclonal antibodies as molecular probes. Cell. 1984 Jan;36(1):15–26. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90069-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES