Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Jun;161(2):521–534. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.2.521

Overlapping roles of the spindle assembly and DNA damage checkpoints in the cell-cycle response to altered chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Peter M Garber 1, Jasper Rine 1
PMCID: PMC1462146  PMID: 12072451

Abstract

The MAD2-dependent spindle checkpoint blocks anaphase until all chromosomes have achieved successful bipolar attachment to the mitotic spindle. The DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints block anaphase in response to DNA lesions that may include single-stranded DNA and stalled replication forks. Many of the same conditions that activate the DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints also activated the spindle checkpoint. The mad2Delta mutation partially relieved the arrest responses of cells to mutations affecting the replication proteins Mcm3p and Pol1p. Thus a previously unrecognized aspect of spindle checkpoint function may be to protect cells from defects in DNA replication. Furthermore, in cells lacking either the DNA damage or the DNA replication checkpoints, the spindle checkpoint contributed to the arrest responses of cells to the DNA-damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate, the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea, and mutations affecting Mcm2p and Orc2p. Thus the spindle checkpoint was sensitive to a wider range of chromosomal perturbations than previously recognized. Finally, the DNA replication checkpoint did not contribute to the arrests of cells in response to mutations affecting ORC, Mcm proteins, or DNA polymerase delta. Thus the specificity of this checkpoint may be more limited than previously recognized.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (299.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bell S. P., Kobayashi R., Stillman B. Yeast origin recognition complex functions in transcription silencing and DNA replication. Science. 1993 Dec 17;262(5141):1844–1849. doi: 10.1126/science.8266072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boulet A., Simon M., Faye G., Bauer G. A., Burgers P. M. Structure and function of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC2 gene encoding the large subunit of DNA polymerase III. EMBO J. 1989 Jun;8(6):1849–1854. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03580.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Budd M. E., Campbell J. L. DNA polymerases delta and epsilon are required for chromosomal replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jan;13(1):496–505. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.1.496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Budd M. E., Wittrup K. D., Bailey J. E., Campbell J. L. DNA polymerase I is required for premeiotic DNA replication and sporulation but not for X-ray repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Feb;9(2):365–376. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.2.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cahill D. P., Lengauer C., Yu J., Riggins G. J., Willson J. K., Markowitz S. D., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature. 1998 Mar 19;392(6673):300–303. doi: 10.1038/32688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Castaño I. B., Brzoska P. M., Sadoff B. U., Chen H., Christman M. F. Mitotic chromosome condensation in the rDNA requires TRF4 and DNA topoisomerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 1996 Oct 15;10(20):2564–2576. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.20.2564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen R. H., Waters J. C., Salmon E. D., Murray A. W. Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science. 1996 Oct 11;274(5285):242–246. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5285.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Desany B. A., Alcasabas A. A., Bachant J. B., Elledge S. J. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 1998 Sep 15;12(18):2956–2970. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.18.2956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Foiani M., Pellicioli A., Lopes M., Lucca C., Ferrari M., Liberi G., Muzi Falconi M., Plevani1 P. DNA damage checkpoints and DNA replication controls in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 2000 Jun 30;451(1-2):187–196. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00049-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Foss M., McNally F. J., Laurenson P., Rine J. Origin recognition complex (ORC) in transcriptional silencing and DNA replication in S. cerevisiae. Science. 1993 Dec 17;262(5141):1838–1844. doi: 10.1126/science.8266071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garner M., van Kreeveld S., Su T. T. mei-41 and bub1 block mitosis at two distinct steps in response to incomplete DNA replication in Drosophila embryos. Curr Biol. 2001 Oct 16;11(20):1595–1599. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00483-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gibson S. I., Surosky R. T., Tye B. K. The phenotype of the minichromosome maintenance mutant mcm3 is characteristic of mutants defective in DNA replication. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5707–5720. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hanna J. S., Kroll E. S., Lundblad V., Spencer F. A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell Biol. 2001 May;21(9):3144–3158. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3144-3158.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hardwick K. G., Li R., Mistrot C., Chen R. H., Dann P., Rudner A., Murray A. W. Lesions in many different spindle components activate the spindle checkpoint in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):509–518. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.2.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoyt M. A. A new view of the spindle checkpoint. J Cell Biol. 2001 Sep 3;154(5):909–911. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200108010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoyt M. A., Totis L., Roberts B. T. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):507–517. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee S. E., Moore J. K., Holmes A., Umezu K., Kolodner R. D., Haber J. E. Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell. 1998 Aug 7;94(3):399–409. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81482-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lei M., Kawasaki Y., Young M. R., Kihara M., Sugino A., Tye B. K. Mcm2 is a target of regulation by Cdc7-Dbf4 during the initiation of DNA synthesis. Genes Dev. 1997 Dec 15;11(24):3365–3374. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.24.3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lengauer C., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 1998 Dec 17;396(6712):643–649. doi: 10.1038/25292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li X., Nicklas R. B. Tension-sensitive kinetochore phosphorylation and the chromosome distribution checkpoint in praying mantid spermatocytes. J Cell Sci. 1997 Mar;110(Pt 5):537–545. doi: 10.1242/jcs.110.5.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li Y., Benezra R. Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science. 1996 Oct 11;274(5285):246–248. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5285.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liang C., Weinreich M., Stillman B. ORC and Cdc6p interact and determine the frequency of initiation of DNA replication in the genome. Cell. 1995 Jun 2;81(5):667–676. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90528-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lowndes N. F., Murguia J. R. Sensing and responding to DNA damage. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2000 Feb;10(1):17–25. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lydall D., Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science. 1995 Dec 1;270(5241):1488–1491. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5241.1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mayer M. L., Gygi S. P., Aebersold R., Hieter P. Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell. 2001 May;7(5):959–970. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00254-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pflumm M. F., Botchan M. R. Orc mutants arrest in metaphase with abnormally condensed chromosomes. Development. 2001 May;128(9):1697–1707. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.9.1697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rieder C. L., Cole R. W., Khodjakov A., Sluder G. The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;130(4):941–948. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.4.941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Skibbens R. V., Corson L. B., Koshland D., Hieter P. Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. Genes Dev. 1999 Feb 1;13(3):307–319. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.3.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):63–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Weinert T. A., Kiser G. L., Hartwell L. H. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 15;8(6):652–665. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wells W. A., Murray A. W. Aberrantly segregating centromeres activate the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J Cell Biol. 1996 Apr;133(1):75–84. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yan H., Gibson S., Tye B. K. Mcm2 and Mcm3, two proteins important for ARS activity, are related in structure and function. Genes Dev. 1991 Jun;5(6):944–957. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.6.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES