Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Jun;161(2):905–914. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.2.905

Application of the false discovery rate to quantitative trait loci interval mapping with multiple traits.

Hakkyo Lee 1, Jack C M Dekkers 1, M Soller 1, Massoud Malek 1, Rohan L Fernando 1, Max F Rothschild 1
PMCID: PMC1462147  PMID: 12072484

Abstract

Controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) has been proposed as an alternative to controlling the genome-wise error rate (GWER) for detecting quantitative trait loci (QTL) in genome scans. The objective here was to implement FDR in the context of regression interval mapping for multiple traits. Data on five traits from an F2 swine breed cross were used. FDR was implemented using tests at every 1 cM (FDR1) and using tests with the highest test statistic for each marker interval (FDRm). For the latter, a method was developed to predict comparison-wise error rates. At low error rates, FDR1 behaved erratically; FDRm was more stable but gave similar significance thresholds and number of QTL detected. At the same error rate, methods to control FDR gave less stringent significance thresholds and more QTL detected than methods to control GWER. Although testing across traits had limited impact on FDR, single-trait testing was recommended because there is no theoretical reason to pool tests across traits for FDR. FDR based on FDRm was recommended for QTL detection in interval mapping because it provides significance tests that are meaningful, yet not overly stringent, such that a more complete picture of QTL is revealed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Churchill G. A., Doerge R. W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963–971. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haley C. S., Knott S. A. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Oct;69(4):315–324. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haley C. S., Knott S. A., Elsen J. M. Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):1195–1207. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):185–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lander E. S., Schork N. J. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science. 1994 Sep 30;265(5181):2037–2048. doi: 10.1126/science.8091226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lander E., Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet. 1995 Nov;11(3):241–247. doi: 10.1038/ng1195-241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lander E., Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet. 1995 Nov;11(3):241–247. doi: 10.1038/ng1195-241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Malek M., Dekkers J. C., Lee H. K., Baas T. J., Prusa K., Huff-Lonergan E., Rothschild M. F. A molecular genome scan analysis to identify chromosomal regions influencing economic traits in the pig. II. Meat and muscle composition. Mamm Genome. 2001 Aug;12(8):637–645. doi: 10.1007/s003350020019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Malek M., Dekkers J. C., Lee H. K., Baas T. J., Rothschild M. F. A molecular genome scan analysis to identify chromosomal regions influencing economic traits in the pig. I. Growth and body composition. Mamm Genome. 2001 Aug;12(8):630–636. doi: 10.1007/s003350020018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moreau L., Charcosset A., Hospital F., Gallais A. Marker-assisted selection efficiency in populations of finite size. Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):1353–1365. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.3.1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mosig M. O., Lipkin E., Khutoreskaya G., Tchourzyna E., Soller M., Friedmann A. A whole genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting milk protein percentage in Israeli-Holstein cattle, by means of selective milk DNA pooling in a daughter design, using an adjusted false discovery rate criterion. Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1683–1698. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Spelman R. J., Coppieters W., Karim L., van Arendonk J. A., Bovenhuis H. Quantitative trait loci analysis for five milk production traits on chromosome six in the Dutch Holstein-Friesian population. Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1799–1808. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Weller J. I., Song J. Z., Heyen D. W., Lewin H. A., Ron M. A new approach to the problem of multiple comparisons in the genetic dissection of complex traits. Genetics. 1998 Dec;150(4):1699–1706. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zaykin D. V., Young S. S., Westfall P. H. Using the false discovery rate approach in the genetic dissection of complex traits: a response to Weller et al. Genetics. 2000 Apr;154(4):1917–1918. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.4.1917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES