Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1996 Nov 1;24(21):4349–4355. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.21.4349

The translational placement of nucleosome cores in vitro determines the access of the transacting factor suGF1 to DNA.

H G Patterton 1, J Hapgood 1
PMCID: PMC146216  PMID: 8932393

Abstract

The sea urchin G-string binding factor (suGF1) is one of several proteins that bind sequence-specifically to oligo(dGxdC) motifs, frequently present upstream of eukaryotic genes. In this study we investigate the interaction of suGF1, purified to near homogeneity, with its oligo(dGxdC) binding site in a reconstituted nucleosome core in vitro. We show that the in vitro reconstitution of a 214 bp fragment containing a suGF1 binding site results in the appearance of five distinct nucleosome core species. These species contain the histone octamer in an identical rotational setting but in different translational frames. The resulting different nucleosomal locations of the suGF1 binding site in the five core species are shown to modulate the ability of suGF1 to bind to nucleosomal DNA, even though the rotational setting of the DNA in the nucleosome cores maximally exposes the suGF1 binding site. We propose that a direct protein-protein steric clash between suGF1 and the histone octamer is the most likely determinant in modulating the binding of suGF1 to its nucleosomally wrapped binding site. This result suggests that in vivo suGF1, like TBP, NF1 and heat shock factor, may require a complementary nucleosome disrupting activity or that suGF1 binds to free nascent replicated DNA prior to nucleosome deposition.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (165.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almouzni G., Méchali M., Wolffe A. P. Competition between transcription complex assembly and chromatin assembly on replicating DNA. EMBO J. 1990 Feb;9(2):573–582. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08145.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burkhoff A. M., Tullius T. D. The unusual conformation adopted by the adenine tracts in kinetoplast DNA. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):935–943. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90702-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark S. P., Lewis C. D., Felsenfeld G. Properties of BGP1, a poly(dG)-binding protein from chicken erythrocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Sep 11;18(17):5119–5126. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.17.5119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Côté J., Quinn J., Workman J. L., Peterson C. L. Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Science. 1994 Jul 1;265(5168):53–60. doi: 10.1126/science.8016655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dong F., van Holde K. E. Nucleosome positioning is determined by the (H3-H4)2 tetramer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 1;88(23):10596–10600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drew H. R., Calladine C. R. Sequence-specific positioning of core histones on an 860 base-pair DNA. Experiment and theory. J Mol Biol. 1987 May 5;195(1):143–173. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90333-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Drew H. R., Travers A. A. DNA structural variations in the E. coli tyrT promoter. Cell. 1984 Jun;37(2):491–502. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90379-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Duband-Goulet I., Carot V., Ulyanov A. V., Douc-Rasy S., Prunell A. Chromatin reconstitution on small DNA rings. IV. DNA supercoiling and nucleosome sequence preference. J Mol Biol. 1992 Apr 20;224(4):981–1001. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90464-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Emerson B. M., Nickol J. M., Fong T. C. Erythroid-specific activation and derepression of the chick beta-globin promoter in vitro. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1189–1200. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90056-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fascher K. D., Schmitz J., Hörz W. Role of trans-activating proteins in the generation of active chromatin at the PHO5 promoter in S. cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1990 Aug;9(8):2523–2528. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07432.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Godde J. S., Nakatani Y., Wolffe A. P. The amino-terminal tails of the core histones and the translational position of the TATA box determine TBP/TFIIA association with nucleosomal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Nov 25;23(22):4557–4564. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.22.4557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hapgood J., Patterton D. Purification of an oligo(dG).oligo(dC)-binding sea urchin nuclear protein, suGF1: a family of G-string factors involved in gene regulation during development. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1402–1409. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayes J. J., Wolffe A. P. Histones H2A/H2B inhibit the interaction of transcription factor IIIA with the Xenopus borealis somatic 5S RNA gene in a nucleosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 15;89(4):1229–1233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.4.1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Imbalzano A. N., Kwon H., Green M. R., Kingston R. E. Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature. 1994 Aug 11;370(6489):481–485. doi: 10.1038/370481a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Karsenty G., de Crombrugghe B. Conservation of binding sites for regulatory factors in the coordinately expressed alpha 1 (I) and alpha 2 (I) collagen promoters. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991 May 31;177(1):538–544. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(91)92017-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kohwi Y., Kohwi-Shigematsu T. Altered gene expression correlates with DNA structure. Genes Dev. 1991 Dec;5(12B):2547–2554. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.12b.2547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lewis C. D., Clark S. P., Felsenfeld G., Gould H. An erythrocyte-specific protein that binds to the poly(dG) region of the chicken beta-globin gene promoter. Genes Dev. 1988 Jul;2(7):863–873. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.7.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li B., Adams C. C., Workman J. L. Nucleosome binding by the constitutive transcription factor Sp1. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 11;269(10):7756–7763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Linxweiler W., Hörz W. Reconstitution of mononucleosomes: characterization of distinct particles that differ in the position of the histone core. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Dec 21;12(24):9395–9413. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.24.9395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu Q., Wallrath L. L., Elgin S. C. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation. J Cell Biochem. 1994 May;55(1):83–92. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240550110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lutter L. C. Characterization of DNase-I cleavage sites in the nucleosome. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978;42(Pt 1):137–147. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Patterton D., Hapgood J. suGF1 binds in the major groove of its oligo(dG).oligo(dC) recognition sequence and is excluded by a positioned nucleosome core. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1410–1418. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Patterton H. G., von Holt C. Negative supercoiling and nucleosome cores. I. The effect of negative supercoiling on the efficiency of nucleosome core formation in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1993 Feb 5;229(3):623–636. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Patterton H. G., von Holt C. Negative supercoiling and nucleosome cores. II. The effect of negative supercoiling on the positioning of nucleosome cores in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1993 Feb 5;229(3):637–655. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Perlmann T., Wrange O. Specific glucocorticoid receptor binding to DNA reconstituted in a nucleosome. EMBO J. 1988 Oct;7(10):3073–3079. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03172.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ramsay N. Deletion analysis of a DNA sequence that positions itself precisely on the nucleosome core. J Mol Biol. 1986 May 5;189(1):179–188. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90389-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schaffner W., Kunz G., Daetwyler H., Telford J., Smith H. O., Birnstiel M. L. Genes and spacers of cloned sea urchin histone DNA analyzed by sequencing. Cell. 1978 Jul;14(3):655–671. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90249-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Simpson R. T. Nucleosome positioning: occurrence, mechanisms, and functional consequences. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1991;40:143–184. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60841-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thoma F., Simpson R. T. Local protein-DNA interactions may determine nucleosome positions on yeast plasmids. Nature. 1985 May 16;315(6016):250–252. doi: 10.1038/315250a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wallrath L. L., Lu Q., Granok H., Elgin S. C. Architectural variations of inducible eukaryotic promoters: preset and remodeling chromatin structures. Bioessays. 1994 Mar;16(3):165–170. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wechsler D. S., Papoulas O., Dang C. V., Kingston R. E. Differential binding of c-Myc and Max to nucleosomal DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):4097–4107. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.4097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Winston F., Carlson M. Yeast SNF/SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection. Trends Genet. 1992 Nov;8(11):387–391. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90300-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Workman J. L., Taylor I. C., Kingston R. E. Activation domains of stably bound GAL4 derivatives alleviate repression of promoters by nucleosomes. Cell. 1991 Feb 8;64(3):533–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90237-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Xiang M., Lu S. Y., Musso M., Karsenty G., Klein W. H. A G-string positive cis-regulatory element in the LpS1 promoter binds two distinct nuclear factors distributed non-uniformly in Lytechinus pictus embryos. Development. 1991 Dec;113(4):1345–1355. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.4.1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES