Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Oct;162(2):705–720. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.2.705

Mutational analysis reveals a role for the C terminus of the proteasome subunit Rpt4p in spindle pole body duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Heather B McDonald 1, Astrid Hoes Helfant 1, Erin M Mahony 1, Shaun K Khosla 1, Loretta Goetsch 1
PMCID: PMC1462277  PMID: 12399382

Abstract

The ubiquitin/proteasome pathway plays a key role in regulating cell cycle progression. Previously, we reported that a conditional mutation in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene RPT4/PCS1, which encodes one of six ATPases in the proteasome 19S cap complex/regulatory particle (RP), causes failure of spindle pole body (SPB) duplication. To improve our understanding of Rpt4p, we created 58 new mutations, 53 of which convert clustered, charged residues to alanine. Virtually all mutations that affect the N-terminal region, which contains a putative nuclear localization signal and coiled-coil motif, result in a wild-type phenotype. Nine mutations that affect the central ATPase domain and the C-terminal region confer recessive lethality. The two conditional mutations identified, rpt4-145 and rpt4-150, affect the C terminus. After shift to high temperature, these mutations generally cause cells to progress slowly through the first cell cycle and to arrest in the second cycle with large buds, a G2 content of DNA, and monopolar spindles, although this phenotype can vary depending on the medium. Additionally, we describe a genetic interaction between RPT4 and the naturally polymorphic gene SSD1, which in wild-type form modifies the rpt4-145 phenotype such that cells arrest in G2 of the first cycle with complete bipolar spindles.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (701.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams I. R., Kilmartin J. V. Localization of core spindle pole body (SPB) components during SPB duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1999 May 17;145(4):809–823. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.4.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams I. R., Kilmartin J. V. Spindle pole body duplication: a model for centrosome duplication? Trends Cell Biol. 2000 Aug;10(8):329–335. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01798-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bass S. H., Mulkerrin M. G., Wells J. A. A systematic mutational analysis of hormone-binding determinants in the human growth hormone receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 May 15;88(10):4498–4502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.10.4498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baudin A., Ozier-Kalogeropoulos O., Denouel A., Lacroute F., Cullin C. A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jul 11;21(14):3329–3330. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.14.3329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett W. F., Paoni N. F., Keyt B. A., Botstein D., Jones A. J., Presta L., Wurm F. M., Zoller M. J. High resolution analysis of functional determinants on human tissue-type plasminogen activator. J Biol Chem. 1991 Mar 15;266(8):5191–5201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Beyer A. Sequence analysis of the AAA protein family. Protein Sci. 1997 Oct;6(10):2043–2058. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560061001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brachmann C. B., Davies A., Cost G. J., Caputo E., Li J., Hieter P., Boeke J. D. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast. 1998 Jan 30;14(2):115–132. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2<115::AID-YEA204>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Braun B. C., Glickman M., Kraft R., Dahlmann B., Kloetzel P. M., Finley D., Schmidt M. The base of the proteasome regulatory particle exhibits chaperone-like activity. Nat Cell Biol. 1999 Aug;1(4):221–226. doi: 10.1038/12043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Byers B., Goetsch L. Preparation of yeast cells for thin-section electron microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:602–608. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94044-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: on protein death and cell life. EMBO J. 1998 Dec 15;17(24):7151–7160. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.24.7151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cunningham B. C., Wells J. A. High-resolution epitope mapping of hGH-receptor interactions by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. Science. 1989 Jun 2;244(4908):1081–1085. doi: 10.1126/science.2471267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cvrcková F., Nasmyth K. Yeast G1 cyclins CLN1 and CLN2 and a GAP-like protein have a role in bud formation. EMBO J. 1993 Dec 15;12(13):5277–5286. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06223.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dohmen R. J., Wu P., Varshavsky A. Heat-inducible degron: a method for constructing temperature-sensitive mutants. Science. 1994 Mar 4;263(5151):1273–1276. doi: 10.1126/science.8122109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Doseff A. I., Arndt K. T. LAS1 is an essential nuclear protein involved in cell morphogenesis and cell surface growth. Genetics. 1995 Nov;141(3):857–871. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.3.857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Elliott S., Knop M., Schlenstedt G., Schiebel E. Spc29p is a component of the Spc110p subcomplex and is essential for spindle pole body duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 25;96(11):6205–6210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Enenkel C., Lehmann A., Kloetzel P. M. Subcellular distribution of proteasomes implicates a major location of protein degradation in the nuclear envelope-ER network in yeast. EMBO J. 1998 Nov 2;17(21):6144–6154. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.21.6144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferdous A., Gonzalez F., Sun L., Kodadek T., Johnston S. A. The 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell. 2001 May;7(5):981–991. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00250-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ferrell K., Wilkinson C. R., Dubiel W., Gordon C. Regulatory subunit interactions of the 26S proteasome, a complex problem. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000 Feb;25(2):83–88. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01529-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Finley D., Tanaka K., Mann C., Feldmann H., Hochstrasser M., Vierstra R., Johnston S., Hampton R., Haber J., Mccusker J. Unified nomenclature for subunits of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome regulatory particle. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Jul;23(7):244–245. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01222-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fisk H. A., Winey M. The mouse Mps1p-like kinase regulates centrosome duplication. Cell. 2001 Jul 13;106(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00411-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Flemington E., Speck S. H. Evidence for coiled-coil dimer formation by an Epstein-Barr virus transactivator that lacks a heptad repeat of leucine residues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(23):9459–9463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.23.9459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Freed E., Lacey K. R., Huie P., Lyapina S. A., Deshaies R. J., Stearns T., Jackson P. K. Components of an SCF ubiquitin ligase localize to the centrosome and regulate the centrosome duplication cycle. Genes Dev. 1999 Sep 1;13(17):2242–2257. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.17.2242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fujiwara T., Watanabe T. K., Tanaka K., Slaughter C. A., DeMartino G. N. cDNA cloning of p42, a shared subunit of two proteasome regulatory proteins, reveals a novel member of the AAA protein family. FEBS Lett. 1996 Jun 3;387(2-3):184–188. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00489-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ghislain M., Udvardy A., Mann C. S. cerevisiae 26S protease mutants arrest cell division in G2/metaphase. Nature. 1993 Nov 25;366(6453):358–362. doi: 10.1038/366358a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gietz D., St Jean A., Woods R. A., Schiestl R. H. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Mar 25;20(6):1425–1425. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.6.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gillette T. G., Huang W., Russell S. J., Reed S. H., Johnston S. A., Friedberg E. C. The 19S complex of the proteasome regulates nucleotide excision repair in yeast. Genes Dev. 2001 Jun 15;15(12):1528–1539. doi: 10.1101/gad.869601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Glickman M. H., Rubin D. M., Coux O., Wefes I., Pfeifer G., Cjeka Z., Baumeister W., Fried V. A., Finley D. A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell. 1998 Sep 4;94(5):615–623. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81603-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gonzalez Fernando, Delahodde Agnes, Kodadek Thomas, Johnston Stephen Albert. Recruitment of a 19S proteasome subcomplex to an activated promoter. Science. 2002 Apr 19;296(5567):548–550. doi: 10.1126/science.1069490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Groll M., Bajorek M., Köhler A., Moroder L., Rubin D. M., Huber R., Glickman M. H., Finley D. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat Struct Biol. 2000 Nov;7(11):1062–1067. doi: 10.1038/80992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Groll M., Ditzel L., Löwe J., Stock D., Bochtler M., Bartunik H. D., Huber R. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature. 1997 Apr 3;386(6624):463–471. doi: 10.1038/386463a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gstaiger M., Marti A., Krek W. Association of human SCF(SKP2) subunit p19(SKP1) with interphase centrosomes and mitotic spindle poles. Exp Cell Res. 1999 Mar 15;247(2):554–562. doi: 10.1006/excr.1999.4386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hartwell L. H. Macromolecule synthesis in temperature-sensitive mutants of yeast. J Bacteriol. 1967 May;93(5):1662–1670. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.5.1662-1670.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Heinisch J. J., Lorberg A., Schmitz H. P., Jacoby J. J. The protein kinase C-mediated MAP kinase pathway involved in the maintenance of cellular integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol. 1999 May;32(4):671–680. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hershko A., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:425–479. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hu J. C., O'Shea E. K., Kim P. S., Sauer R. T. Sequence requirements for coiled-coils: analysis with lambda repressor-GCN4 leucine zipper fusions. Science. 1990 Dec 7;250(4986):1400–1403. doi: 10.1126/science.2147779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hutter K. J., Eipel H. E. Microbial determinations by flow cytometry. J Gen Microbiol. 1979 Aug;113(2):369–375. doi: 10.1099/00221287-113-2-369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jacobs C. W., Adams A. E., Szaniszlo P. J., Pringle J. R. Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1409–1426. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kaeberlein Matt, Guarente Leonard. Saccharomyces cerevisiae MPT5 and SSD1 function in parallel pathways to promote cell wall integrity. Genetics. 2002 Jan;160(1):83–95. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Khalfan W., Ivanovska I., Rose M. D. Functional interaction between the PKC1 pathway and CDC31 network of SPB duplication genes. Genetics. 2000 Aug;155(4):1543–1559. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Koepp D. M., Harper J. W., Elledge S. J. How the cyclin became a cyclin: regulated proteolysis in the cell cycle. Cell. 1999 May 14;97(4):431–434. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80753-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kunau W. H., Beyer A., Franken T., Götte K., Marzioch M., Saidowsky J., Skaletz-Rorowski A., Wiebel F. F. Two complementary approaches to study peroxisome biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: forward and reversed genetics. Biochimie. 1993;75(3-4):209–224. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(93)90079-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Köhler A., Cascio P., Leggett D. S., Woo K. M., Goldberg A. L., Finley D. The axial channel of the proteasome core particle is gated by the Rpt2 ATPase and controls both substrate entry and product release. Mol Cell. 2001 Jun;7(6):1143–1152. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00274-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. McCusker J. H., Haber J. E. Cycloheximide-resistant temperature-sensitive lethal mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1988 Jun;119(2):303–315. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.2.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pellegrino S., Zhang S., Garritsen A., Simonds W. F. The coiled-coil region of the G protein beta subunit. Mutational analysis of Ggamma and effector interactions. J Biol Chem. 1997 Oct 3;272(40):25360–25366. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.40.25360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rechsteiner M., Hoffman L., Dubiel W. The multicatalytic and 26 S proteases. J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 25;268(9):6065–6068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Reijo R. A., Cooper E. M., Beagle G. J., Huffaker T. C. Systematic mutational analysis of the yeast beta-tubulin gene. Mol Biol Cell. 1994 Jan;5(1):29–43. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Reits E. A., Benham A. M., Plougastel B., Neefjes J., Trowsdale J. Dynamics of proteasome distribution in living cells. EMBO J. 1997 Oct 15;16(20):6087–6094. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.20.6087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rose M. D., Fink G. R. KAR1, a gene required for function of both intranuclear and extranuclear microtubules in yeast. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):1047–1060. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90712-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rubin D. M., Glickman M. H., Larsen C. N., Dhruvakumar S., Finley D. Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome. EMBO J. 1998 Sep 1;17(17):4909–4919. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.17.4909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Russell S. J., Gonzalez F., Joshua-Tor L., Johnston S. A. Selective chemical inactivation of AAA proteins reveals distinct functions of proteasomal ATPases. Chem Biol. 2001 Oct;8(10):941–950. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(01)00060-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Russell S. J., Reed S. H., Huang W., Friedberg E. C., Johnston S. A. The 19S regulatory complex of the proteasome functions independently of proteolysis in nucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell. 1999 Jun;3(6):687–695. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)80001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Russell S. J., Steger K. A., Johnston S. A. Subcellular localization, stoichiometry, and protein levels of 26 S proteasome subunits in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1999 Jul 30;274(31):21943–21952. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Schramm C., Elliott S., Shevchenko A., Schiebel E. The Bbp1p-Mps2p complex connects the SPB to the nuclear envelope and is essential for SPB duplication. EMBO J. 2000 Feb 1;19(3):421–433. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.3.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sutton A., Immanuel D., Arndt K. T. The SIT4 protein phosphatase functions in late G1 for progression into S phase. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Apr;11(4):2133–2148. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.4.2133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Takeuchi J., Toh-e A. Genetic evidence for interaction between components of the yeast 26S proteasome: combination of a mutation in RPN12 (a lid component gene) with mutations in RPT1 (an ATPase gene) causes synthetic lethality. Mol Gen Genet. 1999 Aug;262(1):145–153. doi: 10.1007/s004380051069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Tyers M., Jorgensen P. Proteolysis and the cell cycle: with this RING I do thee destroy. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2000 Feb;10(1):54–64. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00049-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Uesono Y., Toh-e A., Kikuchi Y. Ssd1p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae associates with RNA. J Biol Chem. 1997 Jun 27;272(26):16103–16109. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.26.16103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Voges D., Zwickl P., Baumeister W. The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:1015–1068. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Walker J. E., Saraste M., Runswick M. J., Gay N. J. Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J. 1982;1(8):945–951. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01276.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang W., Chevray P. M., Nathans D. Mammalian Sug1 and c-Fos in the nuclear 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8236–8240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wertman K. F., Drubin D. G., Botstein D. Systematic mutational analysis of the yeast ACT1 gene. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):337–350. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wigge P. A., Jensen O. N., Holmes S., Souès S., Mann M., Kilmartin J. V. Analysis of the Saccharomyces spindle pole by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry. J Cell Biol. 1998 May 18;141(4):967–977. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.4.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wigley W. C., Fabunmi R. P., Lee M. G., Marino C. R., Muallem S., DeMartino G. N., Thomas P. J. Dynamic association of proteasomal machinery with the centrosome. J Cell Biol. 1999 May 3;145(3):481–490. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.3.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wilkinson C. R., Wallace M., Morphew M., Perry P., Allshire R., Javerzat J. P., McIntosh J. R., Gordon C. Localization of the 26S proteasome during mitosis and meiosis in fission yeast. EMBO J. 1998 Nov 16;17(22):6465–6476. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Winey M., Goetsch L., Baum P., Byers B. MPS1 and MPS2: novel yeast genes defining distinct steps of spindle pole body duplication. J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(4):745–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.4.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Winey M., Hoyt M. A., Chan C., Goetsch L., Botstein D., Byers B. NDC1: a nuclear periphery component required for yeast spindle pole body duplication. J Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;122(4):743–751. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.4.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wojcik E. J., Glover D. M., Hays T. S. The SCF ubiquitin ligase protein slimb regulates centrosome duplication in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2000 Sep 21;10(18):1131–1134. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00703-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zwickl P., Baumeister W., Steven A. Dis-assembly lines: the proteasome and related ATPase-assisted proteases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2000 Apr;10(2):242–250. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00075-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES