Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Nov;162(3):1329–1339. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.3.1329

Genetic effective size is three orders of magnitude smaller than adult census size in an abundant, Estuarine-dependent marine fish (Sciaenops ocellatus).

Thomas F Turner 1, John P Wares 1, John R Gold 1
PMCID: PMC1462333  PMID: 12454077

Abstract

Using eight microsatellite loci and a variety of analytical methods, we estimated genetic effective size (N(e)) of an abundant and long-lived marine fish species, the red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), in the northern Gulf of Mexico (Gulf). The ratio N(e)/N, where short-term variance N(e) was estimated via the temporal method from shifts in allele-frequency data over four cohorts and where N reflected a current estimate of adult census size in the northern Gulf, was approximately 0.001. In an idealized population, this ratio should approximate unity. The extraordinarily low value of N(e)/N appears to arise from high variance in individual reproductive success and perhaps more importantly from variance in productivity of critical spawning and nursery habitats located in spatially discrete bays and estuaries throughout the northern Gulf. An estimate of N(e) based on a coalescent approach, which measures long-term, inbreeding effective size, was four orders of magnitude lower than the estimate of current census size, suggesting that factors presently driving N(e)/N to low values among red drum in the northern Gulf may have operated similarly in the past. Models that predict N(e)/N exclusively from demographic and life-history features will seriously overestimate N(e) if variance in reproductive success and variance in productivity among spatially discrete demes is underestimated. Our results indicate that these variances, especially variance in productivity among demes, must be large for red drum. Moreover, our study indicates that vertebrate populations with enormous adult census numbers may still be at risk relative to decline and extinction from genetic factors.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (181.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson E. C., Williamson E. G., Thompson E. A. Monte Carlo evaluation of the likelihood for N(e) from temporally spaced samples. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):2109–2118. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barton N. H., Wilson I. Genealogies and geography. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995 Jul 29;349(1327):49–59. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chesser R. K., Rhodes O. E., Jr, Sugg D. W., Schnabel A. Effective sizes for subdivided populations. Genetics. 1993 Dec;135(4):1221–1232. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.4.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Epperson B. K. Gene genealogies in geographically structured populations. Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):797–806. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.2.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gold J. R., Burridge C. P., Turner T. F. A modified stepping-stone model of population structure in red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus (Sciaenidae), from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Genetica. 2001;111(1-3):305–317. doi: 10.1023/a:1013705230346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Higgins K., Lynch M. Metapopulation extinction caused by mutation accumulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 20;98(5):2928–2933. doi: 10.1073/pnas.031358898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hill W. G. A note on effective population size with overlapping generations. Genetics. 1979 May;92(1):317–322. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.1.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hudson R. R. Gene trees, species trees and the segregation of ancestral alleles. Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):509–513. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jorde P. E., Ryman N. Demographic genetics of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and estimation of effective population size from temporal change of allele frequencies. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1369–1381. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jorde P. E., Ryman N. Temporal allele frequency change and estimation of effective size in populations with overlapping generations. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1077–1090. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nei M., Tajima F. Genetic drift and estimation of effective population size. Genetics. 1981 Jul;98(3):625–640. doi: 10.1093/genetics/98.3.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Orive M. E. Effective population size in organisms with complex life-histories. Theor Popul Biol. 1993 Dec;44(3):316–340. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1993.1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Slatkin M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):457–462. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Turner T. F., Richardson L. R., Gold J. R. Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus). Mol Ecol. 1998 Dec;7(12):1771–1773. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00501.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang J. A pseudo-likelihood method for estimating effective population size from temporally spaced samples. Genet Res. 2001 Dec;78(3):243–257. doi: 10.1017/s0016672301005286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Waples R. S. A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics. 1989 Feb;121(2):379–391. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.2.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Whitlock M. C., Barton N. H. The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):427–441. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Williamson E. G., Slatkin M. Using maximum likelihood to estimate population size from temporal changes in allele frequencies. Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):755–761. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.2.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES