Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Nov;162(3):1179–1195. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.3.1179

A genetic screen for suppressors and enhancers of the Drosophila cdk1-cyclin B identifies maternal factors that regulate microtubule and microfilament stability.

Jun-Yuan Ji 1, Marjan Haghnia 1, Cory Trusty 1, Lawrence S B Goldstein 1, Gerold Schubiger 1
PMCID: PMC1462342  PMID: 12454065

Abstract

Coordination between cell-cycle progression and cytoskeletal dynamics is important for faithful transmission of genetic information. In early Drosophila embryos, increasing maternal cyclin B leads to higher Cdk1-CycB activity, shorter microtubules, and slower nuclear movement during cycles 5-7 and delays in nuclear migration to the cortex at cycle 10. Later during cycle 14 interphase of six cycB embryos, we observed patches of mitotic nuclei, chromosome bridges, abnormal nuclear distribution, and small and large nuclei. These phenotypes indicate disrupted coordination between the cell-cycle machinery and cytoskeletal function. Using these sensitized phenotypes, we performed a dosage-sensitive genetic screen to identify maternal proteins involved in this process. We identified 10 suppressors classified into three groups: (1) gene products regulating Cdk1 activities, cdk1 and cyclin A; (2) gene products interacting with both microtubules and microfilaments, Actin-related protein 87C; and (3) gene products interacting with microfilaments, chickadee, diaphanous, Cdc42, quail, spaghetti-squash, zipper, and scrambled. Interestingly, most of the suppressors that rescue the astral microtubule phenotype also reduce Cdk1-CycB activities and are microfilament-related genes. This suggests that the major mechanism of suppression relies on the interactions among Cdk1-CycB, microtubule, and microfilament networks. Our results indicate that the balance among these different components is vital for normal early cell cycles and for embryonic development. Our observations also indicate that microtubules and cortical microfilaments antagonize each other during the preblastoderm stage.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (827.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Afshar K., Stuart B., Wasserman S. A. Functional analysis of the Drosophila diaphanous FH protein in early embryonic development. Development. 2000 May;127(9):1887–1897. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.9.1887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker J., Theurkauf W. E., Schubiger G. Dynamic changes in microtubule configuration correlate with nuclear migration in the preblastoderm Drosophila embryo. J Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;122(1):113–121. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradke F., Dotti C. G. The role of local actin instability in axon formation. Science. 1999 Mar 19;283(5409):1931–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5409.1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Castrillon D. H., Wasserman S. A. Diaphanous is required for cytokinesis in Drosophila and shares domains of similarity with the products of the limb deformity gene. Development. 1994 Dec;120(12):3367–3377. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.12.3367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clegg N. J., Whitehead I. P., Williams J. A., Spiegelman G. B., Grigliatti T. A. A developmental and molecular analysis of Cdc2 mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome. 1993 Aug;36(4):676–685. doi: 10.1139/g93-091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooley L., Verheyen E., Ayers K. chickadee encodes a profilin required for intercellular cytoplasm transport during Drosophila oogenesis. Cell. 1992 Apr 3;69(1):173–184. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90128-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edgar B. A., Sprenger F., Duronio R. J., Leopold P., O'Farrell P. H. Distinct molecular mechanism regulate cell cycle timing at successive stages of Drosophila embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 1994 Feb 15;8(4):440–452. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.4.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards K. A., Kiehart D. P. Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II has multiple essential roles in imaginal disc and egg chamber morphogenesis. Development. 1996 May;122(5):1499–1511. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.5.1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evangelista M., Blundell K., Longtine M. S., Chow C. J., Adames N., Pringle J. R., Peter M., Boone C. Bni1p, a yeast formin linking cdc42p and the actin cytoskeleton during polarized morphogenesis. Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):118–122. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5309.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Finkel T., Theriot J. A., Dise K. R., Tomaselli G. F., Goldschmidt-Clermont P. J. Dynamic actin structures stabilized by profilin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Feb 15;91(4):1510–1514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.4.1510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Foe V. E., Alberts B. M. Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. J Cell Sci. 1983 May;61:31–70. doi: 10.1242/jcs.61.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Foe V. E., Field C. M., Odell G. M. Microtubules and mitotic cycle phase modulate spatiotemporal distributions of F-actin and myosin II in Drosophila syncytial blastoderm embryos. Development. 2000 May;127(9):1767–1787. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.9.1767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Forscher P., Smith S. J. Actions of cytochalasins on the organization of actin filaments and microtubules in a neuronal growth cone. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1505–1516. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fyrberg C., Ryan L., Kenton M., Fyrberg E. Genes encoding actin-related proteins of Drosophila melanogaster. J Mol Biol. 1994 Aug 19;241(3):498–503. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Garces J. A., Clark I. B., Meyer D. I., Vallee R. B. Interaction of the p62 subunit of dynactin with Arp1 and the cortical actin cytoskeleton. Curr Biol. 1999 Dec 16;9(24):1497–1500. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)80122-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Genova J. L., Jong S., Camp J. T., Fehon R. G. Functional analysis of Cdc42 in actin filament assembly, epithelial morphogenesis, and cell signaling during Drosophila development. Dev Biol. 2000 May 1;221(1):181–194. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Giansanti M. G., Bonaccorsi S., Williams B., Williams E. V., Santolamazza C., Goldberg M. L., Gatti M. Cooperative interactions between the central spindle and the contractile ring during Drosophila cytokinesis. Genes Dev. 1998 Feb 1;12(3):396–410. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.3.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldstein L. S., Gunawardena S. Flying through the drosophila cytoskeletal genome. J Cell Biol. 2000 Jul 24;150(2):F63–F68. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.2.f63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goode B. L., Drubin D. G., Barnes G. Functional cooperation between the microtubule and actin cytoskeletons. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000 Feb;12(1):63–71. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(99)00058-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Halsell S. R., Chu B. I., Kiehart D. P. Genetic analysis demonstrates a direct link between rho signaling and nonmuscle myosin function during Drosophila morphogenesis. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1253–1265. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hartley R. S., Rempel R. E., Maller J. L. In vivo regulation of the early embryonic cell cycle in Xenopus. Dev Biol. 1996 Feb 1;173(2):408–419. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hays T. S., Deuring R., Robertson B., Prout M., Fuller M. T. Interacting proteins identified by genetic interactions: a missense mutation in alpha-tubulin fails to complement alleles of the testis-specific beta-tubulin gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Mar;9(3):875–884. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.3.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hirotsune S., Fleck M. W., Gambello M. J., Bix G. J., Chen A., Clark G. D., Ledbetter D. H., McBain C. J., Wynshaw-Boris A. Graded reduction of Pafah1b1 (Lis1) activity results in neuronal migration defects and early embryonic lethality. Nat Genet. 1998 Aug;19(4):333–339. doi: 10.1038/1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang J., Raff J. W. The disappearance of cyclin B at the end of mitosis is regulated spatially in Drosophila cells. EMBO J. 1999 Apr 15;18(8):2184–2195. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.8.2184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hunt T., Luca F. C., Ruderman J. V. The requirements for protein synthesis and degradation, and the control of destruction of cyclins A and B in the meiotic and mitotic cell cycles of the clam embryo. J Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;116(3):707–724. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.3.707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hyman A. A., White J. G. Determination of cell division axes in the early embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2123–2135. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacobs H. W., Knoblich J. A., Lehner C. F. Drosophila Cyclin B3 is required for female fertility and is dispensable for mitosis like Cyclin B. Genes Dev. 1998 Dec 1;12(23):3741–3751. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.23.3741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kang F., Purich D. L., Southwick F. S. Profilin promotes barbed-end actin filament assembly without lowering the critical concentration. J Biol Chem. 1999 Dec 24;274(52):36963–36972. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.52.36963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Karess R. E., Chang X. J., Edwards K. A., Kulkarni S., Aguilera I., Kiehart D. P. The regulatory light chain of nonmuscle myosin is encoded by spaghetti-squash, a gene required for cytokinesis in Drosophila. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1177–1189. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90013-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kennison J. A., Tamkun J. W. Dosage-dependent modifiers of polycomb and antennapedia mutations in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):8136–8140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim S. H., Li C., Maller J. L. A maternal form of the phosphatase Cdc25A regulates early embryonic cell cycles in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1999 Aug 15;212(2):381–391. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kubiak J. Z., Weber M., de Pennart H., Winston N. J., Maro B. The metaphase II arrest in mouse oocytes is controlled through microtubule-dependent destruction of cyclin B in the presence of CSF. EMBO J. 1993 Oct;12(10):3773–3778. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06055.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee L. A., Elfring L. K., Bosco G., Orr-Weaver T. L. A genetic screen for suppressors and enhancers of the Drosophila PAN GU cell cycle kinase identifies cyclin B as a target. Genetics. 2001 Aug;158(4):1545–1556. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.4.1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li W., Noll E., Perrimon N. Identification of autosomal regions involved in Drosophila Raf function. Genetics. 2000 Oct;156(2):763–774. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.2.763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Limbourg B., Zalokar M. Permeabilization of Drosophila eggs. Dev Biol. 1973 Dec;35(2):382–387. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90034-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mahajan-Miklos S., Cooley L. Intercellular cytoplasm transport during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Biol. 1994 Oct;165(2):336–351. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Maldonado-Codina G., Glover D. M. Cyclins A and B associate with chromatin and the polar regions of spindles, respectively, and do not undergo complete degradation at anaphase in syncytial Drosophila embryos. J Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;116(4):967–976. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.4.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Manseau L., Calley J., Phan H. Profilin is required for posterior patterning of the Drosophila oocyte. Development. 1996 Jul;122(7):2109–2116. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.7.2109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mitchison T. J., Sedat J. Localization of antigenic determinants in whole Drosophila embryos. Dev Biol. 1983 Sep;99(1):261–264. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90275-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Morgan D. O. Principles of CDK regulation. Nature. 1995 Mar 9;374(6518):131–134. doi: 10.1038/374131a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Muhua L., Karpova T. S., Cooper J. A. A yeast actin-related protein homologous to that in vertebrate dynactin complex is important for spindle orientation and nuclear migration. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):669–679. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90531-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Murray A. W., Kirschner M. W. Cyclin synthesis drives the early embryonic cell cycle. Nature. 1989 May 25;339(6222):275–280. doi: 10.1038/339275a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nicholls R. E., Gelbart W. M. Identification of chromosomal regions involved in decapentaplegic function in Drosophila. Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):203–215. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nurse P. Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature. 1990 Apr 5;344(6266):503–508. doi: 10.1038/344503a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Palmer R. E., Sullivan D. S., Huffaker T., Koshland D. Role of astral microtubules and actin in spindle orientation and migration in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;119(3):583–593. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.3.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pantaloni D., Carlier M. F. How profilin promotes actin filament assembly in the presence of thymosin beta 4. Cell. 1993 Dec 3;75(5):1007–1014. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90544-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schroer T. A., Bingham J. B., Gill S. R. Actin-related protein 1 and cytoplasmic dynein-based motility - what's the connection? Trends Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;6(6):212–215. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(96)20014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sibon O. C., Laurençon A., Hawley R., Theurkauf W. E. The Drosophila ATM homologue Mei-41 has an essential checkpoint function at the midblastula transition. Curr Biol. 1999 Mar 25;9(6):302–312. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80138-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sibon O. C., Stevenson V. A., Theurkauf W. E. DNA-replication checkpoint control at the Drosophila midblastula transition. Nature. 1997 Jul 3;388(6637):93–97. doi: 10.1038/40439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sider J. R., Mandato C. A., Weber K. L., Zandy A. J., Beach D., Finst R. J., Skoble J., Bement W. M. Direct observation of microtubule-f-actin interaction in cell free lysates. J Cell Sci. 1999 Jun;112(Pt 12):1947–1956. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.12.1947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sisson J. C., Field C., Ventura R., Royou A., Sullivan W. Lava lamp, a novel peripheral golgi protein, is required for Drosophila melanogaster cellularization. J Cell Biol. 2000 Nov 13;151(4):905–918. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.4.905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Skop A. R., White J. G. The dynactin complex is required for cleavage plane specification in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Curr Biol. 1998 Oct 8;8(20):1110–1116. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70465-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Stevenson V. A., Kramer J., Kuhn J., Theurkauf W. E. Centrosomes and the Scrambled protein coordinate microtubule-independent actin reorganization. Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Jan;3(1):68–75. doi: 10.1038/35050579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Steward R., Nüsslein-Volhard C. The genetics of the dorsal-Bicaudal-D region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1986 Jul;113(3):665–678. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.3.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Stiffler L. A., Ji J. Y., Trautmann S., Trusty C., Schubiger G. Cyclin A and B functions in the early Drosophila embryo. Development. 1999 Dec;126(23):5505–5513. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.23.5505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Su T. T., Sprenger F., DiGregorio P. J., Campbell S. D., O'Farrell P. H. Exit from mitosis in Drosophila syncytial embryos requires proteolysis and cyclin degradation, and is associated with localized dephosphorylation. Genes Dev. 1998 May 15;12(10):1495–1503. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.10.1495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sullivan W., Fogarty P., Theurkauf W. Mutations affecting the cytoskeletal organization of syncytial Drosophila embryos. Development. 1993 Aug;118(4):1245–1254. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.4.1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Theurkauf W. E. Behavior of structurally divergent alpha-tubulin isotypes during Drosophila embryogenesis: evidence for post-translational regulation of isotype abundance. Dev Biol. 1992 Nov;154(1):205–217. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90060-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Vaughan K. T., Tynan S. H., Faulkner N. E., Echeverri C. J., Vallee R. B. Colocalization of cytoplasmic dynein with dynactin and CLIP-170 at microtubule distal ends. J Cell Sci. 1999 May;112(Pt 10):1437–1447. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.10.1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Verde F., Dogterom M., Stelzer E., Karsenti E., Leibler S. Control of microtubule dynamics and length by cyclin A- and cyclin B-dependent kinases in Xenopus egg extracts. J Cell Biol. 1992 Sep;118(5):1097–1108. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.5.1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Verde F., Labbé J. C., Dorée M., Karsenti E. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by cdc2 protein kinase in cell-free extracts of Xenopus eggs. Nature. 1990 Jan 18;343(6255):233–238. doi: 10.1038/343233a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Verheyen E. M., Cooley L. Profilin mutations disrupt multiple actin-dependent processes during Drosophila development. Development. 1994 Apr;120(4):717–728. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.4.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wasserman S. FH proteins as cytoskeletal organizers. Trends Cell Biol. 1998 Mar;8(3):111–115. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(97)01217-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yamashiro S., Chern H., Yamakita Y., Matsumura F. Mutant Caldesmon lacking cdc2 phosphorylation sites delays M-phase entry and inhibits cytokinesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Jan;12(1):239–250. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.1.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Yin H., Pruyne D., Huffaker T. C., Bretscher A. Myosin V orientates the mitotic spindle in yeast. Nature. 2000 Aug 31;406(6799):1013–1015. doi: 10.1038/35023024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zachariae W., Nasmyth K. Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 1999 Aug 15;13(16):2039–2058. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.16.2039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. von Dassow G., Schubiger G. How an actin network might cause fountain streaming and nuclear migration in the syncytial Drosophila embryo. J Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;127(6 Pt 1):1637–1653. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.6.1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES