Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Dec;162(4):1885–1895. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.4.1885

Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance.

J P Hua 1, Y Z Xing 1, C G Xu 1, X L Sun 1, S B Yu 1, Qifa Zhang 1
PMCID: PMC1462368  PMID: 12524357

Abstract

We introduced an experimental design that produced an "immortalized F(2)" population allowing for complete dissection of genetic components underlying quantitative traits. Data for yield and three component traits of the immortalized F(2) were collected from replicated field trials over 2 years. Using 231 marker loci, we resolved the genetic effects into individual components and assessed relative performance of all the genotypes at both single- and two-locus levels. Single-locus analysis detected 40 QTL for the four traits. Dominance effects for about one-half of the QTL were negative, resulting in little "net" positive dominance effect. Correlation between genotype heterozygosity and trait performance was low. Large numbers of digenic interactions, including AA, AD, and DD, were detected for all the traits, with AA as the most prevalent interaction. Complementary two-locus homozygotes frequently performed the best among the nine genotypes of many two-locus combinations. While cumulative small advantages over two-locus combinations may partly explain the genetic basis of heterosis of the hybrid as double heterozygotes frequently demonstrated marginal advantages, double heterozygotes were never the best genotypes in any of the two-locus combinations. It was concluded that heterozygotes were not necessarily advantageous for trait performance even among genotypes derived from such a highly heterotic hybrid.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (91.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cheverud J. M., Routman E. J. Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1455–1461. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cockerham C C. An Extension of the Concept of Partitioning Hereditary Variance for Analysis of Covariances among Relatives When Epistasis Is Present. Genetics. 1954 Nov;39(6):859–882. doi: 10.1093/genetics/39.6.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davenport C. B. DEGENERATION, ALBINISM AND INBREEDING. Science. 1908 Oct 2;28(718):454–455. doi: 10.1126/science.28.718.454-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edwards M. D., Stuber C. W., Wendel J. F. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):113–125. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jooste P. L., Weight M. J., Locatelli-Rossi L., Lombard C. J. Impact after 1 year of compulsory iodisation on the iodine content of table salt at retailer level in South Africa. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 1999 Jan;50(1):7–12. doi: 10.1080/096374899101373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Li Z. K., Luo L. J., Mei H. W., Wang D. L., Shu Q. Y., Tabien R., Zhong D. B., Ying C. S., Stansel J. W., Khush G. S. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics. 2001 Aug;158(4):1737–1753. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.4.1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Luo L. J., Li Z. K., Mei H. W., Shu Q. Y., Tabien R., Zhong D. B., Ying C. S., Stansel J. W., Khush G. S., Paterson A. H. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain yield components. Genetics. 2001 Aug;158(4):1755–1771. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.4.1755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Paterson A. H., Lander E. S., Hewitt J. D., Peterson S., Lincoln S. E., Tanksley S. D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):721–726. doi: 10.1038/335721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wright S. The Results of Crosses between Inbred Strains of Guinea Pigs, Differing in Number of Digits. Genetics. 1934 Nov;19(6):537–551. doi: 10.1093/genetics/19.6.537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Xiao J., Li J., Yuan L., Tanksley S. D. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):745–754. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Xing Z., Tan F., Hua P., Sun L., Xu G., Zhang Q. Characterization of the main effects, epistatic effects and their environmental interactions of QTLs on the genetic basis of yield traits in rice. Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Jun 19;105(2-3):248–257. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-0952-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yu S. B., Li J. X., Xu C. G., Tan Y. F., Gao Y. J., Li X. H., Zhang Q., Saghai Maroof M. A. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9226–9231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zeng Z. B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1457–1468. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zeng Z. B. Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 1;90(23):10972–10976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.23.10972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES