Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2003 Mar;163(3):843–856. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.3.843

Ku-dependent and Ku-independent end-joining pathways lead to chromosomal rearrangements during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Xin Yu 1, Abram Gabriel 1
PMCID: PMC1462499  PMID: 12663527

Abstract

Chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by either homology-dependent or homology-independent pathways. Nonhomologous repair mechanisms have been relatively less well studied, despite their potential importance in generating chromosomal rearrangements. We have developed a Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based assay to identify and characterize homology-independent chromosomal rearrangements associated with repair of a unique DSB generated within an engineered URA3 gene. Approximately 1% of successfully repaired cells have accompanying chromosomal rearrangements consisting of large insertions, deletions, aberrant gene conversions, or other more complex changes. We have analyzed rearrangements in isogenic wild-type, rad52, yku80, and rad52 yku80 strains, to determine the types of events that occur in the presence or absence of these key repair proteins. Deletions were found in all strain backgrounds, but insertions were dependent upon the presence of Yku80p. A rare RAD52- and YKU80-independent form of deletion was present in all strains. These events were characterized by long one-sided deletions (up to 13 kb) and extensive imperfect overlapping sequences (7-22 bp) at the junctions. Our results demonstrate that the frequency and types of repair events depend on the specific genetic context. This approach can be applied to a number of problems associated with chromosome stability.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (417.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alani E., Cao L., Kleckner N. A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics. 1987 Aug;116(4):541–545. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.541.test. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailis A. M., Rothstein R. A defect in mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stimulates ectopic recombination between homeologous genes by an excision repair dependent process. Genetics. 1990 Nov;126(3):535–547. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Belmaaza A., Chartrand P. One-sided invasion events in homologous recombination at double-strand breaks. Mutat Res. 1994 May;314(3):199–208. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)90065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boulton S. J., Jackson S. P. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: roles in DNA double strand break rejoining and in telomeric maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Dec 1;24(23):4639–4648. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.23.4639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boulton S. J., Jackson S. P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways. EMBO J. 1996 Sep 16;15(18):5093–5103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Casaregola S., Nguyen H. V., Lepingle A., Brignon P., Gendre F., Gaillardin C. A family of laboratory strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae carry rearrangements involving chromosomes I and III. Yeast. 1998 Apr 30;14(6):551–564. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980430)14:6<551::AID-YEA260>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cervelli T., Galli A. Effects of HDF1 (Ku70) and HDF2 (Ku80) on spontaneous and DNA damage-induced intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 2000 Sep;264(1-2):56–63. doi: 10.1007/s004380000280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen C., Kolodner R. D. Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat Genet. 1999 Sep;23(1):81–85. doi: 10.1038/12687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen C., Umezu K., Kolodner R. D. Chromosomal rearrangements occur in S. cerevisiae rfa1 mutator mutants due to mutagenic lesions processed by double-strand-break repair. Mol Cell. 1998 Jul;2(1):9–22. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80109-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen L., Trujillo K., Ramos W., Sung P., Tomkinson A. E. Promotion of Dnl4-catalyzed DNA end-joining by the Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 and Hdf1/Hdf2 complexes. Mol Cell. 2001 Nov;8(5):1105–1115. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00388-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clikeman J. A., Khalsa G. J., Barton S. L., Nickoloff J. A. Homologous recombinational repair of double-strand breaks in yeast is enhanced by MAT heterozygosity through yKU-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Genetics. 2001 Feb;157(2):579–589. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.2.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Codón A. C., Benítez T., Korhola M. Chromosomal reorganization during meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae baker's yeasts. Curr Genet. 1997 Oct;32(4):247–259. doi: 10.1007/s002940050274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis A. P., Symington L. S. The yeast recombinational repair protein Rad59 interacts with Rad52 and stimulates single-strand annealing. Genetics. 2001 Oct;159(2):515–525. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.2.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dynan W. S., Yoo S. Interaction of Ku protein and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit with nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Apr 1;26(7):1551–1559. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.7.1551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fasullo M., Dave P., Rothstein R. DNA-damaging agents stimulate the formation of directed reciprocal translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 1994 Mar;314(2):121–133. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)90076-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fischer G., James S. A., Roberts I. N., Oliver S. G., Louis E. J. Chromosomal evolution in Saccharomyces. Nature. 2000 May 25;405(6785):451–454. doi: 10.1038/35013058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fishman-Lobell J., Rudin N., Haber J. E. Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;12(3):1292–1303. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Frank-Vaillant M., Marcand S. NHEJ regulation by mating type is exercised through a novel protein, Lif2p, essential to the ligase IV pathway. Genes Dev. 2001 Nov 15;15(22):3005–3012. doi: 10.1101/gad.206801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grenon M., Gilbert C., Lowndes N. F. Checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks requires the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Sep;3(9):844–847. doi: 10.1038/ncb0901-844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Haber J. E. In vivo biochemistry: physical monitoring of recombination induced by site-specific endonucleases. Bioessays. 1995 Jul;17(7):609–620. doi: 10.1002/bies.950170707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haber J. E., Leung W. Y. Lack of chromosome territoriality in yeast: promiscuous rejoining of broken chromosome ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13949–13954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Harris S., Rudnicki K. S., Haber J. E. Gene conversions and crossing over during homologous and homeologous ectopic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hendrickson E. A., Schatz D. G., Weaver D. T. The scid gene encodes a trans-acting factor that mediates the rejoining event of Ig gene rearrangement. Genes Dev. 1988 Jul;2(7):817–829. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.7.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoffman C. S., Winston F. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1987;57(2-3):267–272. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Karathanasis Elissa, Wilson Thomas E. Enhancement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae end-joining efficiency by cell growth stage but not by impairment of recombination. Genetics. 2002 Jul;161(3):1015–1027. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.3.1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kegel A., Sjöstrand J. O., Aström S. U. Nej1p, a cell type-specific regulator of nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Curr Biol. 2001 Oct 16;11(20):1611–1617. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00488-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kirik A., Salomon S., Puchta H. Species-specific double-strand break repair and genome evolution in plants. EMBO J. 2000 Oct 16;19(20):5562–5566. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.20.5562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kramer K. M., Brock J. A., Bloom K., Moore J. K., Haber J. E. Two different types of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are repaired by similar RAD52-independent, nonhomologous recombination events. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1293–1301. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Legoix P., Sarkissian H. D., Cazes L., Giraud S., Sor F., Rouleau G. A., Lenoir G., Thomas G., Zucman-Rossi J. Molecular characterization of germline NF2 gene rearrangements. Genomics. 2000 Apr 1;65(1):62–66. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lewis L. K., Resnick M. A. Tying up loose ends: nonhomologous end-joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 2000 Jun 30;451(1-2):71–89. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00041-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liang F., Han M., Romanienko P. J., Jasin M. Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 28;95(9):5172–5177. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liang F., Jasin M. Ku80-deficient cells exhibit excess degradation of extrachromosomal DNA. J Biol Chem. 1996 Jun 14;271(24):14405–14411. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.24.14405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin Y., Waldman A. S. Promiscuous patching of broken chromosomes in mammalian cells with extrachromosomal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Oct 1;29(19):3975–3981. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.19.3975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Manivasakam P., Weber S. C., McElver J., Schiestl R. H. Micro-homology mediated PCR targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Jul 25;23(14):2799–2800. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.14.2799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mezard C., Nicolas A. Homologous, homeologous, and illegitimate repair of double-strand breaks during transformation of a wild-type strain and a rad52 mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1278–1292. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Moore J. K., Haber J. E. Capture of retrotransposon DNA at the sites of chromosomal double-strand breaks. Nature. 1996 Oct 17;383(6601):644–646. doi: 10.1038/383644a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Moore J. K., Haber J. E. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 May;16(5):2164–2173. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.5.2164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Myung K., Datta A., Kolodner R. D. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 2001 Feb 9;104(3):397–408. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00227-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nugent C. I., Bosco G., Ross L. O., Evans S. K., Salinger A. P., Moore J. K., Haber J. E., Lundblad V. Telomere maintenance is dependent on activities required for end repair of double-strand breaks. Curr Biol. 1998 May 21;8(11):657–660. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70253-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ochman H., Gerber A. S., Hartl D. L. Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):621–623. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ooi S. L., Shoemaker D. D., Boeke J. D. A DNA microarray-based genetic screen for nonhomologous end-joining mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 2001 Nov 8;294(5551):2552–2556. doi: 10.1126/science.1065672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pierce A. J., Hu P., Han M., Ellis N., Jasin M. Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 15;15(24):3237–3242. doi: 10.1101/gad.946401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Porter G., Westmoreland J., Priebe S., Resnick M. A. Homologous and homeologous intermolecular gene conversion are not differentially affected by mutations in the DNA damage or the mismatch repair genes RAD1, RAD50, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, PMS1 and MSH2. Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):755–767. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Potier S., Winsor B., Lacroute F. Genetic selection for reciprocal translocation at chosen chromosomal sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Sep;2(9):1025–1032. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.9.1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Priebe S. D., Westmoreland J., Nilsson-Tillgren T., Resnick M. A. Induction of recombination between homologous and diverged DNAs by double-strand gaps and breaks and role of mismatch repair. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;14(7):4802–4814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pâques F., Haber J. E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Jun;63(2):349–404. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pâques F., Haber J. E. Two pathways for removal of nonhomologous DNA ends during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Nov;17(11):6765–6771. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.11.6765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pâques F., Leung W. Y., Haber J. E. Expansions and contractions in a tandem repeat induced by double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Apr;18(4):2045–2054. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.4.2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ricchetti M., Fairhead C., Dujon B. Mitochondrial DNA repairs double-strand breaks in yeast chromosomes. Nature. 1999 Nov 4;402(6757):96–100. doi: 10.1038/47076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rothkamm K., Kühne M., Jeggo P. A., Löbrich M. Radiation-induced genomic rearrangements formed by nonhomologous end-joining of DNA double-strand breaks. Cancer Res. 2001 May 15;61(10):3886–3893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schiestl R. H., Dominska M., Petes T. D. Transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with nonhomologous DNA: illegitimate integration of transforming DNA into yeast chromosomes and in vivo ligation of transforming DNA to mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 May;13(5):2697–2705. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.5.2697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schiestl R. H. Nonmutagenic carcinogens induce intrachromosomal recombination in yeast. Nature. 1989 Jan 19;337(6204):285–288. doi: 10.1038/337285a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Schiestl R. H., Petes T. D. Integration of DNA fragments by illegitimate recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Sep 1;88(17):7585–7589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.17.7585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Schiestl R. H., Zhu J., Petes T. D. Effect of mutations in genes affecting homologous recombination on restriction enzyme-mediated and illegitimate recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;14(7):4493–4500. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Schuler W., Weiler I. J., Schuler A., Phillips R. A., Rosenberg N., Mak T. W., Kearney J. F., Perry R. P., Bosma M. J. Rearrangement of antigen receptor genes is defective in mice with severe combined immune deficiency. Cell. 1986 Sep 26;46(7):963–972. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90695-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sikorski R. S., Boeke J. D. In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:302–318. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sugawara N., Ira G., Haber J. E. DNA length dependence of the single-strand annealing pathway and the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD59 in double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Jul;20(14):5300–5309. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.14.5300-5309.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sugawara N., Szostak J. W. Recombination between sequences in nonhomologous positions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(18):5675–5679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Taccioli G. E., Rathbun G., Oltz E., Stamato T., Jeggo P. A., Alt F. W. Impairment of V(D)J recombination in double-strand break repair mutants. Science. 1993 Apr 9;260(5105):207–210. doi: 10.1126/science.8469973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Teng S. C., Kim B., Gabriel A. Retrotransposon reverse-transcriptase-mediated repair of chromosomal breaks. Nature. 1996 Oct 17;383(6601):641–644. doi: 10.1038/383641a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Valencia M., Bentele M., Vaze M. B., Herrmann G., Kraus E., Lee S. E., Schär P., Haber J. E. NEJ1 controls non-homologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2001 Dec 6;414(6864):666–669. doi: 10.1038/414666a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Van de Water N., Williams R., Ockelford P., Browett P. A 20.7 kb deletion within the factor VIII gene associated with LINE-1 element insertion. Thromb Haemost. 1998 May;79(5):938–942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Verkaik Nicole S., Esveldt-van Lange Rebecca E. E., van Heemst Diana, Brüggenwirth Hennie T., Hoeijmakers Jan H. J., Zdzienicka Malgorzata Z., van Gent Dik C. Different types of V(D)J recombination and end-joining defects in DNA double-strand break repair mutant mammalian cells. Eur J Immunol. 2002 Mar;32(3):701–709. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200203)32:3<701::AID-IMMU701>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wach A., Brachat A., Pöhlmann R., Philippsen P. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1994 Dec;10(13):1793–1808. doi: 10.1002/yea.320101310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Walker J. R., Corpina R. A., Goldberg J. Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair. Nature. 2001 Aug 9;412(6847):607–614. doi: 10.1038/35088000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Welcker A. J., de Montigny J., Potier S., Souciet J. L. Involvement of very short DNA tandem repeats and the influence of the RAD52 gene on the occurrence of deletions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2000 Oct;156(2):549–557. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.2.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wiemels J. L., Greaves M. Structure and possible mechanisms of TEL-AML1 gene fusions in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Res. 1999 Aug 15;59(16):4075–4082. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Woods-Samuels P., Kazazian H. H., Jr, Antonarakis S. E. Nonhomologous recombination in the human genome: deletions in the human factor VIII gene. Genomics. 1991 May;10(1):94–101. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90489-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Yu X., Gabriel A. Patching broken chromosomes with extranuclear cellular DNA. Mol Cell. 1999 Nov;4(5):873–881. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80397-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES