Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2003 Aug;164(4):1589–1595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/164.4.1589

Minimizing inbreeding by managing genetic contributions across generations.

Leopoldo Sánchez 1, Piter Bijma 1, John A Woolliams 1
PMCID: PMC1462651  PMID: 12930762

Abstract

Here we present the strategy that achieves the lowest possible rate of inbreeding (DeltaF) for a population with unequal numbers of sires and dams with random mating. This new strategy results in a DeltaF as much as 10% lower than previously achieved. A simple and efficient approach to reducing inbreeding in small populations with sexes of unequal census number is to impose a breeding structure where parental success is controlled in each generation. This approach led to the development of strategies for selecting replacements each generation that were based upon parentage, e.g., a son replacing its sire. This study extends these strategies to a multigeneration round robin scheme where genetic contributions of ancestors to descendants are managed to remove all uncertainties about breeding roles over generations; i.e., male descendants are distributed as equally as possible among dams. In doing so, the sampling variance of genetic contributions within each breeding category is eliminated and consequently DeltaF is minimized. Using the concept of long-term genetic contributions, the asymptotic DeltaF of the new strategy for random mating, M sires and d dams per sire, is phi/(12M), where phi = [1 + 2((1)/(4))(d)]. Predictions were validated using Monte Carlo simulations. The scheme was shown to achieve the lowest possible DeltaF using pedigree alone and showed that further reductions in DeltaF below that obtained from random mating arise from preferential mating of relatives and not from their avoidance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (124.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caballero A. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity (Edinb) 1994 Dec;73(Pt 6):657–679. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1994.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caballero A., Hill W. G. Effective size of nonrandom mating populations. Genetics. 1992 Apr;130(4):909–916. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frankham R. Conservation genetics. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:305–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.001513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sonesson A. K., Meuwissen T. H. Minimization of rate of inbreeding for small populations with overlapping generations. Genet Res. 2001 Jun;77(3):285–292. doi: 10.1017/s0016672301005079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Visscher P. M., Smith D., Hall S. J., Williams J. L., Williams J. A. A viable herd of genetically uniform cattle. Nature. 2001 Jan 18;409(6818):303–303. doi: 10.1038/35053160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang J. Optimal marker-assisted selection to increase the effective size of small populations. Genetics. 2001 Feb;157(2):867–874. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.2.867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Woolliams J. A., Bijma P. Predicting rates of inbreeding in populations undergoing selection. Genetics. 2000 Apr;154(4):1851–1864. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.4.1851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wray N. R., Thompson R. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genet Res. 1990 Feb;55(1):41–54. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300025180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES