Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2003 Aug;164(4):1471–1480. doi: 10.1093/genetics/164.4.1471

Natural selection drives Drosophila immune system evolution.

Todd A Schlenke 1, David J Begun 1
PMCID: PMC1462669  PMID: 12930753

Abstract

Evidence from disparate sources suggests that natural selection may often play a role in the evolution of host immune system proteins. However, there have been few attempts to make general population genetic inferences on the basis of analysis of several immune-system-related genes from a single species. Here we present DNA polymorphism and divergence data from 34 genes thought to function in the innate immune system of Drosophila simulans and compare these data to those from 28 nonimmunity genes sequenced from the same lines. Several statistics, including average K(A)/K(S) ratio, average silent heterozygosity, and average haplotype diversity, significantly differ between the immunity and nonimmunity genes, suggesting an important role for directional selection in immune system protein evolution. In contrast to data from mammalian immunoglobulins and other proteins, we find no strong evidence for the selective maintenance of protein diversity in Drosophila immune system proteins. This may be a consequence of Drosophila's generalized innate immune response.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (96.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akashi H. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1067–1076. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akashi H. Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1297–1307. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andolfatto P. Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Mar;18(3):279–290. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer V. L., Aquadro C. F. Rates of DNA sequence evolution are not sex-biased in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Dec;14(12):1252–1257. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Begun D. J. The frequency distribution of nucleotide variation in Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Jul;18(7):1343–1352. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Begun D. J., Whitley P. Adaptive evolution of relish, a Drosophila NF-kappaB/IkappaB protein. Genetics. 2000 Mar;154(3):1231–1238. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.3.1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Begun D. J., Whitley P. Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 May 23;97(11):5960–5965. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.11.5960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Begun David J. Protein variation in Drosophila simulans, and comparison of genes from centromeric versus noncentromeric regions of chromosome 3. Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Feb;19(2):201–203. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Belvin M. P., Anderson K. V. A conserved signaling pathway: the Drosophila toll-dorsal pathway. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:393–416. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bishop J. G., Dean A. M., Mitchell-Olds T. Rapid evolution in plant chitinases: molecular targets of selection in plant-pathogen coevolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 May 9;97(10):5322–5327. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Braverman J. M., Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):783–796. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clark A. G., Wang L. Molecular population genetics of Drosophila immune system genes. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):713–724. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Date A., Satta Y., Takahata N., Chigusa S. I. Evolutionary history and mechanism of the Drosophila cecropin gene family. Immunogenetics. 1998 May;47(6):417–429. doi: 10.1007/s002510050379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dawkins R., Krebs J. R. Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):489–511. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fay J. C., Wu C. I. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405–1413. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fay Justin C., Wyckoff Gerald J., Wu Chung-I. Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila. Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):1024–1026. doi: 10.1038/4151024a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gillespie J. H. Junk ain't what junk does: neutral alleles in a selected context. Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):291–299. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00470-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gillespie J. H. The role of population size in molecular evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Apr;55(2):145–156. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1998.1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hasson E., Wang I. N., Zeng L. W., Kreitman M., Eanes W. F. Nucleotide variation in the triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi) locus of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jun;15(6):756–769. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hueck C. J. Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Jun;62(2):379–433. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.2.379-433.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hughes A. L., Nei M. Nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class II loci: evidence for overdominant selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb;86(3):958–962. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.3.958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hughes A. L., Nei M. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):167–170. doi: 10.1038/335167a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hughes A. L., Ota T., Nei M. Positive Darwinian selection promotes charge profile diversity in the antigen-binding cleft of class I major-histocompatibility-complex molecules. Mol Biol Evol. 1990 Nov;7(6):515–524. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kimbrell D. A., Beutler B. The evolution and genetics of innate immunity. Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr;2(4):256–267. doi: 10.1038/35066006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kliman R. M., Hey J. DNA sequence variation at the period locus within and among species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex. Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):375–387. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.2.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lemaitre B., Reichhart J. M., Hoffmann J. A. Drosophila host defense: differential induction of antimicrobial peptide genes after infection by various classes of microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14614–14619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Li W. H., Wu C. I., Luo C. C. A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Mar;2(2):150–174. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McDonald J. H., Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–654. doi: 10.1038/351652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mol A. Readers object to 'anti-natalist' article.. Can Fam Physician. 1982 Jun;28:1067–1067. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Morton B. R. Chloroplast DNA codon use: evidence for selection at the psb A locus based on tRNA availability. J Mol Evol. 1993 Sep;37(3):273–280. doi: 10.1007/BF00175504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Murphy P. M. Molecular mimicry and the generation of host defense protein diversity. Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):823–826. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90571-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Przeworski Molly. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1179–1189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ramos-Onsins S., Aguadé M. Molecular evolution of the Cecropin multigene family in Drosophila. functional genes vs. pseudogenes. Genetics. 1998 Sep;150(1):157–171. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.1.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rozas J., Rozas R. DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics. 1999 Feb;15(2):174–175. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schesser K., Spiik A. K., Dukuzumuremyi J. M., Neurath M. F., Pettersson S., Wolf-Watz H. The yopJ locus is required for Yersinia-mediated inhibition of NF-kappaB activation and cytokine expression: YopJ contains a eukaryotic SH2-like domain that is essential for its repressive activity. Mol Microbiol. 1998 Jun;28(6):1067–1079. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00851.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Silverman N., Maniatis T. NF-kappaB signaling pathways in mammalian and insect innate immunity. Genes Dev. 2001 Sep 15;15(18):2321–2342. doi: 10.1101/gad.909001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith Nick G. C., Eyre-Walker Adam. Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):1022–1024. doi: 10.1038/4151022a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Stahl E. A., Bishop J. G. Plant-pathogen arms races at the molecular level. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000 Aug;3(4):299–304. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00083-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tajima F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):437–460. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Takano T. S. Rate variation of DNA sequence evolution in the Drosophila lineages. Genetics. 1998 Jun;149(2):959–970. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.2.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tanaka T., Nei M. Positive darwinian selection observed at the variable-region genes of immunoglobulins. Mol Biol Evol. 1989 Sep;6(5):447–459. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. True J. R., Mercer J. M., Laurie C. C. Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Feb;142(2):507–523. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.2.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wright F. The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene. 1990 Mar 1;87(1):23–29. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90491-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES