Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2003 Dec;165(4):2307–2312. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2307

Distinguishing the hitchhiking and background selection models.

Hideki Innan 1, Wolfgang Stephan 1
PMCID: PMC1462879  PMID: 14704207

Abstract

A simple method to distinguish hitchhiking and background selection is proposed. It is based on the observation that these models make different predictions about the average level of nucleotide diversity in regions of low recombination. The method is applied to data from Drosophila melanogaster and two highly selfing tomato species.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (82.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andolfatto P. Adaptive hitchhiking effects on genome variability. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001 Dec;11(6):635–641. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00246-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andolfatto P., Przeworski M. Regions of lower crossing over harbor more rare variants in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2001 Jun;158(2):657–665. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.2.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baudry E., Kerdelhué C., Innan H., Stephan W. Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus. Genetics. 2001 Aug;158(4):1725–1735. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.4.1725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cherry Joshua L., Wakeley John. A diffusion approximation for selection and drift in a subdivided population. Genetics. 2003 Jan;163(1):421–428. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.1.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cutter Asher D., Payseur Bret A. Selection at linked sites in the partial selfer Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Apr 2;20(5):665–673. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1605–1617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Innan Hideki, Padhukasahasram Badri, Nordborg Magnus. The pattern of polymorphism on human chromosome 21. Genome Res. 2003 Jun;13(6A):1158–1168. doi: 10.1101/gr.466303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim Y., Stephan W. Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1415–1427. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim Yuseob, Stephan Wolfgang. Selective sweeps in the presence of interference among partially linked loci. Genetics. 2003 May;164(1):389–398. doi: 10.1093/genetics/164.1.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nachman M. W. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and recombination rate in humans. Trends Genet. 2001 Sep;17(9):481–485. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02409-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nordborg M. Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics. 1997 Aug;146(4):1501–1514. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.4.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nordborg Magnus, Innan Hideki. Molecular population genetics. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Feb;5(1):69–73. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(01)00230-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sherman J. D., Stack S. M. Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. VI. High-resolution recombination nodule map for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Genetics. 1995 Oct;141(2):683–708. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.2.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stephan W. An improved method for estimating the rate of fixation of favorable mutations based on DNA polymorphism data. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):959–962. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stephan W., Langley C. H. DNA polymorphism in lycopersicon and crossing-over per physical length. Genetics. 1998 Dec;150(4):1585–1593. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES