Abstract
It is well known that an allele causing increased recombination is expected to proliferate as a result of genetic drift in a finite population undergoing selection, without requiring other mechanisms. This is supported by recent simulations apparently demonstrating that, in small populations, drift is more important than epistasis in increasing recombination, with this effect disappearing in larger finite populations. However, recent experimental evidence finds a greater advantage for recombination in larger populations. These results are reconciled by demonstrating through simulation without epistasis that for m loci recombination has an appreciable selective advantage over a range of population sizes (am, bm). bm increases steadily with m while am remains fairly static. Thus, however large the finite population, if selection acts on sufficiently many loci, an allele that increases recombination is selected for. We show that as selection acts on our finite population, recombination increases the variance in expected log fitness, causing indirect selection on a recombination-modifying locus. This effect is enhanced in those populations with more loci because the variance in phenotypic fitnesses in relation to the possible range will be smaller. Thus fixation of a particular haplotype is less likely to occur, increasing the advantage of recombination.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Altenberg L., Feldman M. W. Selection, generalized transmission and the evolution of modifier genes. I. The reduction principle. Genetics. 1987 Nov;117(3):559–572. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.3.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barton N. H. A general model for the evolution of recombination. Genet Res. 1995 Apr;65(2):123–145. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300033140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlesworth B. Recombination modification in a flucturating environment. Genetics. 1976 May;83(1):181–195. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.1.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colegrave Nick. Sex releases the speed limit on evolution. Nature. 2002 Dec 12;420(6916):664–666. doi: 10.1038/nature01191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eshel I., Feldman M. W. On the evolutionary effect of recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1970 May;1(1):88–100. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(70)90043-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feldman M. W., Christiansen F. B., Brooks L. D. Evolution of recombination in a constant environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4838–4841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein J. The effect of linkage on directional selection. Genetics. 1965 Aug;52(2):349–363. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.2.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974 Oct;78(2):737–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein J., Yokoyama S. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. II. Individual selection for recombination. Genetics. 1976 Aug;83(4):845–859. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.4.845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill W. G., Robertson A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korol A. B., Iliadi K. G. Increased recombination frequencies resulting from directional selection for geotaxis in Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 1994 Jan;72(Pt 1):64–68. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1994.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lenormand T., Otto S. P. The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment. Genetics. 2000 Sep;156(1):423–438. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otto S. P., Barton N. H. Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution. 2001 Oct;55(10):1921–1931. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otto S. P., Barton N. H. The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):879–906. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peters AD, Lively CM. The Red Queen and Fluctuating Epistasis: A Population Genetic Analysis of Antagonistic Coevolution. Am Nat. 1999 Oct;154(4):393–405. doi: 10.1086/303247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rice William R. Experimental tests of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination. Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Apr;3(4):241–251. doi: 10.1038/nrg760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith J. M. A short-term advantage for sex and recombination through sib-competition. J Theor Biol. 1976 Dec;63(2):245–258. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(76)90033-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]