Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2003 Dec;165(4):2153–2166. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2153

Selection and drift in subdivided populations: a straightforward method for deriving diffusion approximations and applications involving dominance, selfing and local extinctions.

Denis Roze 1, François Rousset 1
PMCID: PMC1462907  PMID: 14704194

Abstract

Population structure affects the relative influence of selection and drift on the change in allele frequencies. Several models have been proposed recently, using diffusion approximations to calculate fixation probabilities, fixation times, and equilibrium properties of subdivided populations. We propose here a simple method to construct diffusion approximations in structured populations; it relies on general expressions for the expectation and variance in allele frequency change over one generation, in terms of partial derivatives of a "fitness function" and probabilities of genetic identity evaluated in a neutral model. In the limit of a very large number of demes, these probabilities can be expressed as functions of average allele frequencies in the metapopulation, provided that coalescence occurs on two different timescales, which is the case in the island model. We then use the method to derive expressions for the probability of fixation of new mutations, as a function of their dominance coefficient, the rate of partial selfing, and the rate of deme extinction. We obtain more precise approximations than those derived by recent work, in particular (but not only) when deme sizes are small. Comparisons with simulations show that the method gives good results as long as migration is stronger than selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (157.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carr R. N., Nassar R. F. Effects of selection and drift on the dynamics of finite populations. I. Ultimate probability of fixation of a favorable allele. Biometrics. 1970 Mar;26(1):41–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cherry Joshua L. Selection in a subdivided population with dominance or local frequency dependence. Genetics. 2003 Apr;163(4):1511–1518. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.4.1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cherry Joshua L. Selection in a subdivided population with local extinction and recolonization. Genetics. 2003 Jun;164(2):789–795. doi: 10.1093/genetics/164.2.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cherry Joshua L., Wakeley John. A diffusion approximation for selection and drift in a subdivided population. Genetics. 2003 Jan;163(1):421–428. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.1.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibson G. Epistasis and pleiotropy as natural properties of transcriptional regulation. Theor Popul Biol. 1996 Feb;49(1):58–89. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1996.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KIMURA M. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics. 1962 Jun;47:713–719. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.6.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lande R. The fixation of chromosomal rearrangements in a subdivided population with local extinction and colonization. Heredity (Edinb) 1985 Jun;54(Pt 3):323–332. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1985.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maruyama T. On the fixation probability of mutant genes in a subdivided population. Genet Res. 1970 Apr;15(2):221–225. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300001543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rousset F. Effective size in simple metapopulation models. Heredity (Edinb) 2003 Aug;91(2):107–111. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rousset F. Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure? Heredity (Edinb) 2002 May;88(5):371–380. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Slatkin M. Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theor Popul Biol. 1977 Dec;12(3):253–262. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90045-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Takahata N. Genealogy of neutral genes and spreading of selected mutations in a geographically structured population. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Taylor P. D., Frank S. A. How to make a kin selection model. J Theor Biol. 1996 May 7;180(1):27–37. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wakeley John. Polymorphism and divergence for island-model species. Genetics. 2003 Jan;163(1):411–420. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.1.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Whitlock M. C., Barton N. H. The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):427–441. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Whitlock Michael C. Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. Genetics. 2003 Jun;164(2):767–779. doi: 10.1093/genetics/164.2.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Whitlock Michael C. Selection, load and inbreeding depression in a large metapopulation. Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1191–1202. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES