Abstract
The core of statistical inference is based on both hypothesis testing and estimation. The use of inferential statistics for QTL identification thus includes estimation of genetic effects and statistical tests. Typically, QTL are reported only when the test statistics reach a predetermined critical value. Therefore, the estimated effects of detected QTL are actually sampled from a truncated distribution. As a result, the expectations of detected QTL effects are biased upward. In a simulation study, William D. Beavis showed that the average estimates of phenotypic variances associated with correctly identified QTL were greatly overestimated if only 100 progeny were evaluated, slightly overestimated if 500 progeny were evaluated, and fairly close to the actual magnitude when 1000 progeny were evaluated. This phenomenon has subsequently been called the Beavis effect. Understanding the theoretical basis of the Beavis effect will help interpret QTL mapping results and improve success of marker-assisted selection. This study provides a statistical explanation for the Beavis effect. The theoretical prediction agrees well with the observations reported in Beavis's original simulation study. Application of the theory to meta-analysis of QTL mapping is discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (152.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Haley C. S., Knott S. A. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Oct;69(4):315–324. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayes B., Goddard M. E. The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Genet Sel Evol. 2001 May-Jun;33(3):209–229. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-33-3-209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jansen R. C. Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):205–211. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics. 1981 Nov-Dec;99(3-4):541–553. doi: 10.1093/genetics/99.3-4.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R., Thompson R. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):743–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo Lang, Mao Yongcai, Xu Shizhong. Correcting the bias in estimation of genetic variances contributed by individual QTL. Genetica. 2003 Oct;119(2):107–113. doi: 10.1023/a:1026028928003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otto S. P., Jones C. D. Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):2093–2107. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sillanpä M. J., Arjas E. Bayesian mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci from incomplete inbred line cross data. Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):1373–1388. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.3.1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Shizhong. Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. Genetics. 2003 Feb;163(2):789–801. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.2.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng Z. B. Correcting the bias of Wright's estimates of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character: a further improved method. Genetics. 1992 Aug;131(4):987–1001. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.4.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng Z. B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1457–1468. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]