Skip to main content
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B logoLink to Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
. 2006 Apr 14;7(5):331–341. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2006.B0331

Organ preconditioning: the past, current status, and related lung studies

Shi-ping Luh 1,, Pan-chyr Yang 2
PMCID: PMC1462933  PMID: 16615162

Abstract

Preconditioning (PC) has emerged as a powerful method for experimentally and clinically attenuating various types of organ injuries. In this paper related clinical and basic research issues on organ preconditioning issues were systemically reviewed. Since lung injuries, including ischemia-reperfusion and others, play important roles in many clinical results, including thromboembolism, trauma, thermal injury, hypovolemic and endotoxin shock, reimplantation response after organ transplantation, and many respiratory diseases in critical care. It is of interest to uncover methods, including the PCs, to protect the lung from the above injuries. However, related studies on pulmonary PC are relatively rare and still being developed, so we will review previous literature on experimental and clinical studies on pulmonary PC in the following paragraphs.

Keywords: Preconditioning, Ischemia-reperfusion, Lung

PRECONDITIONING: AN OVERVIEW OF VARIOUS ORGANS

Preconditioning (PC) is a process where cells or tissues exposed to a sublethal stimulus are transiently protected from a subsequent normal lethal stress (Nandagopal et al., 2001; Cutrn et al., 2002; Kirino et al., 1991; Kirino, 2002; Raeburn et al., 2001; Peralta et al., 1999; Gasparri et al., 1999). Many forms of preconditioning have been investigated, such as ischemic, thermal, pharmacologic, or gas inhalation (particularly in lung injury) (McCormick et al., 2003). Preconditioning can attenuate the subsequent prolonged or lethal tissue injury by increasing the cell tolerance to the stress.

Organ PC was first recognized by Murry et al.(1986), who originally tried to create a larger area of myocardial infarction by performing several brief episodes of myocardial ischemia prior to protracted ischemia, but got paradoxical results. The protective effect of PC in the heart can be assessed by limiting infarct size, reducing myocardial stunning, preventing arrhythmias, or accelerating the recovery of myocardial function after ischemia (Muller et al., 1990; Tamura et al., 1997; Cleveland et al., 1996; Sun et al., 1995; Shiki and Hearse, 1987; Pomerantz et al., 2000).

Organ PC plays a very important role in the pathogenesis and treatment of cardiac disease (Kuzuya et al., 1993). The heart possesses a remarkable ability to adapt to stress and is resistant to injury. The recognition of PC in myocardium has been one of the major advances in the field of myocardial ischemia. In addition to the protective effects of PC on ischemic myocardium, PC can also be found in patients undergoing open heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (Li et al., 1998a; 2001). Patients undergoing repeated cycles of aortic clamping ischemia for 3 min followed by 2 to 3 min of reperfusion prior to cardiopulmonary bypass can elevate the coronary blood ATP levels (Yellon et al., 1993), as well as decrease the troponin release (Alkhulaifi, 1997). Subsequent studies revealed that this type of ischemic PC can attenuate the CPB related I/R changes, such as the increase in neutrophils, thromboxane B2, and malonedialdehyde, and increased superoxide dimultase and calcitonin gene-related peptide levels (Li et al., 1998b). In vitro studies using isolated or cultured myocytes revealed more evidences on the protective effects of PC on the human myocardium (Walker et al., 1995; Ikonomidis et al., 1994). PC also plays an important role in the field of heart transplantation, in which attenuation of injuries related to the hypothermic ischemia of the donor heart during harvest and preservation is very important. There have been both in vitro (Cleveland et al., 1996) and in vivo (Karck et al., 1996) studies to prove the protective effects of ischemic PC against the I/R injuries related to heart graft preservation.

Organ PC also plays an important role in abdominal viscera. In liver, since ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) is the major cause of morbidity after major resection or transplantation, PC provides a promising strategy for attenuating related injuries (Qian et al., 1999; Raeburn et al., 2001). Clamping of the portal triad (inflow occlusion) is often used during major liver resection to minimize blood loss. Several clinical and experimental studies revealed that intermittent inflow occlusion is better tolerated than prolonged continuous periods of ischemia (Horiuchi et al., 1995; Hardy et al., 1995; Isozaki et al., 1992). In rat model, it was found that ischemic PC can reduce both liver and lung damage following liver transplantation (Fernández et al., 2002). In intestine, PC was also found to have beneficial effect by delaying the development of tissue necrosis and by reduction of bacterial translocation during subsequent I/R (McCallion et al., 2000; Aksoyek et al., 2002). In kidney, ischemic PC was also proved in clinical or experimental models to have protective effects against I/R injury after renal arterial occlusion or graft preservation during transplantation (Fuller et al., 2005).

PC phenomena also exist in neurological tissues. In brain, researchers have found that animals exposed to brief periods of hypoxia are protected against cerebral ischemia. These phenomena can be applied, in the near future, in the field of ischemic or hypoxic injury of brain (Sharp et al., 2004; Chen and Simon, 1997; Kirino, 2002). Recent evidence revealed that PC with short periods of both global and focal ischemia can induce tolerance in the brain (Barone et al., 1998). The detailed mechanisms of PC varies in different animal species or organ systems, although in general these could be classified as the immediate acquisition which is related to post-translational modification, or delayed induction related to new protein synthesis (Kirino, 2002). These “biphasic” phenomena of PC have been observed in brain, heart, and liver tissues in human or other animals (Kirino et al., 1991; Bolli, 2000; Raeburn et al., 2001; Fernández et al., 2002; 2003; Harkin et al., 2002; Xia et al., 2003; Thomas et al., 2003). PC has also been considered as one of the protective strategies against spinal cord ischemia. Matsuyama et al.(1997) applied canine spinal cord ischemic PC model, with their thoracic aortas being cross-clamped for 20 min followed by formal ischemia with aortas being cross clamped for 60 min. It was found that animals undergoing ischemic PC, compared with the control group (sham operation followed by formal ischemia), can significantly attenuate the incidence of paraplegia due to spinal cord ischemia.

Ischemic or pharmacological PCs have also been proved to protect the limbs as well as the remote organs (heart, lungs) against injuries from I/R, which will occur in various clinical diseases or situations, such as peripheral arterial thromboembolism, free-flap muscle transplantation or orthopedic surgery with the use of tourniquet to block the blood flow (Papanastasiou et al., 1999; Harkin et al., 2002; Olguner et al., 2006).

HISTOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR MECHA-NISMS OF ORGAN PRECONDITIONING

The histological and molecular mechanisms of PC have been partially uncovered. Ischemic PC protecting the tissue against subsequent ischemia-reperfusion has been demonstrated in large and small animal models (Raeburn et al., 2001; Peralta et al., 1999; Gasparri et al., 1999). However, this model is repugnant to doctors for clinical use. Through the realization of its molecular mechanism, ischemic PC can be replicated by pharmacologic agents through the activation of cell membrane receptors (adenosine, α-adrenergic, bradykinin, and opioid receptors) (Liu et al., 1991; Schulz et al., 1998; 2001a), administration of endogenous triggers (free radicals, nitric oxide, calcium) (Ferrari, 1996; Post et al., 2000; Cain et al., 1999), activation of intracellular signaling pathway (PKC, TK, and MAP kinase pathway), and affecting related end effectors (metabolism, protein synthesis (e.g. heat-shock protein, Hsp), K-ATP channels, Na-K pump, and cytoskeleton) (Murry et al., 1990; Chen et al., 1997; Garlid et al., 1997; Freshney et al., 1994).

How does the PC protect the tissue from injury? The PC mechanisms described above exists in common among different organs of human as well as many other animal species. However, there still exist certain differences between different species or organ systems (Schulz et al., 2001a). The mechanisms of tissue ischemia-reperfusion injury are related to the cellular activation (neutrophils, T lymphocyte and antigen presenting cells (APCs)), formation of proinflammatory mediators (cytokines and chemokines), expression of adhesion molecules, activation of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) system, and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Jaeschke et al., 1991; Witthaut et al., 1994; Zhang et al., 1995; Sawaya et al., 1999; Bajt et al., 2001; Gujral et al., 2001; Jaeschke, 2003). The PC can activate various cell membrane receptors (adenosine, etc.), causing subsequent activation of intracellular signaling (PKC, TC and MAPK pathways). The final effects of PC not only triggers the increased tolerance of the cells in the myocardium, but also causes quiescent cells to participate in the cell cycles in the hepatocytes. In addition, PC can induce the production of heat shock proteins (HSPs), especially HSP70 or HSP32 (HO-1) which can reduce the nuclear binding of proinflammatory transcription factors and increase the oxidant capacity of the cells (Chen et al., 1997; McCormick et al., 2003).

Previous studies revealed myocardial ischemic PC had a biphasic phenomenon, with an early phase of protection that develops within minutes from the initial assault and lasts 2 to 3 h, and a delayed phase that becomes apparent 12 to 24 h later and lasts 3 to 4 d (Kuzuya et al., 1993; Marber et al., 1993). Unlike the early PC of myocardium, which can protect against infarction only, the delayed PC can also protect against myocardial stunning (Tyagi and Tayal, 2002; Bolli, 2000). The cascade of delayed PC in the myocardium can be subdivided into the following three major components (Bolli, 2000): (1) Triggers: the molecules that are generated during the first ischemic challenge and responsible for the initial adaptation. (2) Mediators: the molecules that are expressed in the 24 to 72 h later and responsible for conferring protection during the index ischemic challenge. (3) The intercellular signaling pathways that are activated by the triggers.

Triggers of PC (Schulz et al., 2001b) can be classified as follows: (1) receptor-dependent endogenous triggers, such as adenosine, bradykinin, opioids, prostaglandin (PG) and catecholamines; (2) receptor-independent endogenous triggers, such as oxygen free radicals, nitric oxide (NO), and calcium ion; (3) exogenous triggers, such as adenosine, bradykinin, opioids, oxygen free radicals, NO, PG and catecholamines. These above triggers act in episodes of preconditioning. Block in this phase will abolish the PC effect. Adenosine has been proved to play important roles in organ PC and can produce the protective effects of PC and preserve the ATP through receptor (A1) dependent or exogenous pathway (Maczewski and Beresewicz, 1998; Giannella et al., 1997). Pretreatment with bradykinin provides cardiac protection against free radical injury through the activation of B2 receptors (Jin and Chen, 1998). However, some other experiment also emphasized the role of endogenously produced B1 receptor in PC (Bouchard et al., 1998). The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during the ischemic PC has also been reported to trigger delayed protection from the subsequent injury (Sun et al., 1996; Kaeffer et al., 1997; Tang et al., 1997; Yamashita et al., 1998). These animal studies showed that the administration of agents with defense mechanisms to the ROS, such as the anti-oxidants (N-2-mercaptopropionyl glycine, MPG), radical scavenger (dimethylthiourea), superoxide dimultase (SOD), or catalase plus MPG, during the initial ischemic challenge prevented the development of PC. NO generation during the initial and late ischemic PC has been proven (Bolli et al., 1997; Qiu et al., 1997). Exogenous exposure to NO can induce delayed protective effect against the myocardial infarction or stunning (Banerjee et al., 1999; Guo et al., 1999a; Hill et al., 2000).

The possible end effectors of PC include mediators to alter the cell energy (ATP) or substrates (carbohydrates or protein) metabolism, ion channels (K-ATP or Na-H pump) and cytoskeletons. Previous literature has shown that PC could reduce the energy requirement during index injury, slow the accumulation of metabolites, and also reduce glycolysis. Blockade of cellular transcription (actinomycin-D) or translation (cycloheximide) was found to abolish the PC effects. Mediators (effectors) of the PC, which develop delayed protection from subsequent tissue injuries, included NO synthase (NOS), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), aldose reductase, Mn-SOD, heat shock proteins (HSPs), and ATP sensitive K+ (K-ATP) channels. K-ATP channels, which were mainly located on the sacrolemma and mitochondria, has been reported as effectors of organ protection by PC (Gross and Fryer, 1999; Grover and Garlid, 2000). Guo et al.(1999b) demonstrated that the late phase of ischemic PC is associated with upregulation of myocardial iNOS while eNOS remains unchanged. Thus, NO seemed to act in ischemic PC initially as the trigger (see the above paragraph) and subsequently as the mediator (Takano et al., 1998; Wang et al., 2000). COX-2 protein expression has been proved to be upregulated after ischemic PC in myocardium, concomitant with an increase in the tissue PGs levels (Shinmura et al., 2000). Administration of selective COX-2 inhibitor, such as celecoxib 24 h after ischemic PC, would abolish the increase in PGs and the protective effect of late PC (Guo et al., 2000). Previous studies revealed that NO can directly activated COX-2, which is downstream of iNOS in the preconditioned myocardium (Bolli, 2000). MnSOD induction, which might be caused by the production of ROS, TNF-α, and interleukin-1β, has been observed after heat stress or exercise (Yamashita et al., 1997; 1998). The mechanism of mitochondrial K-ATP protection may involve alterations in mitochondrial handling, optimization of energy production, and modulation of ROS production. The role of HSP in the PC induced tissue protection remains controversial. Some studies supported the protective role of HSP70 (Plumier et al., 1995; Radford et al., 1996), but some other studies revealed contradictory results (Yamashita et al., 1997; Qian et al., 1999). Mitochondrial K-ATP channels are not only a common downstream effector leading to PC protection but also provide positive feedback by altering upstream signals or triggers (Tyagi and Tayal, 2002).

The intracellular signaling transduction pathway of PC includes the activation of G protein and phospholipase C (in early PC) or D in delayed PC. The subsequent activation of the protein kinases (PKs) cascade pathway, in the order of protein kinase C (PKC), tyroine kinase (TK), and mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPK). These above mediators act in prolonged index ischemia or other injuries. Block in this phase will also abolish the PC effect. Activation of PKC is a crucial step because inhibition of it during PC will abolish protection at later stage (24 h later) (Baxter et al., 1995). The PKC activation after ischemic PC is isoform selective and ξ appears to be the specific isotype for the development (Qiu et al., 1998). It was found that ischemic PC selectively activates 2 members (Src and Lck) of the TKs family and that this activation is blocked by chelerythrine, suggesting that the TKs are distal to the PKC in the PC signaling transduction pathway (Ping et al., 1999a). MAPK superfamily is another downstream target of PKC dependent signaling during PC development, with this activation being also abolished by chelerythrine, indicating that it is downstream of PKC activation (Ping et al., 1999a; 1999b).

PRECONDITIONING OF THE LUNG, CURRENT EXPERIMENTAL STATUS AND CLINICAL APPLICATIONS

Previous studies on PC tolerance were mainly focused on the field of ischemia mode in cardiac or neural tissues. Since lung injuries, including ischemia-reperfusion and others, play important roles in many clinical results, including thromboembolism, trauma, thermal injury, hypovolemic and endotoxin shock, reimplantation response after organ transplantation, and many respiratory diseases in critical care. It is of interest to uncover methods, including the PCs, to protect the lung from the above injuries. However, related studies on pulmonary PC are relatively rare, so we will review previous literature about experimental and clinical studies on the pulmonary PC in the following paragraphs.

Lung ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury plays an important role in many clinical problems, including thromboembolism, trauma, thermal injury, hypovolemic and endotoxin shock, organ transplantation, and many respiratory diseases requiring critical care. The problem of donor organ shortage has been especially severe in clinical lung transplantation because of the scarcity of suitable donors and difficulty in lung graft preservation (Egan et al., 1991; Lee et al., 1998). Organ ischemia or hypoperfusion causes ATP exhaustion in mitochondria, with subsequent cell membrane permeability change, intracellular osmolality change, cytoskeletal and mitochondrial damage, or even cell apoptosis or necrosis. Organ reperfusion causes further worsening of injury, which is related to the interaction between neutrophil and dysfunctional endothelial cells. Subsequent changes, such as the organ free radical production, activation or the coagulation system, or further inflammatory cells adhesion and other types of tissue injuries that occur in the reperfusion stage (Becker et al., 1992; 1998; Seeger et al., 1994; Luh et al., 1999; 2000; 2002; 2004). Preconditioning can reduce the ischemia-reperfusion injury in solid organs such as the heart, liver, kidney and bones. However, there are relatively limited data on similar effects on lungs (Gasparri et al., 1999; Soncul et al., 1999; Du et al., 1996; Featherstone et al., 2000; Schutte et al., 2001; Neely and Keith, 1995; Huang et al., 2002; Waldow et al., 2004).

The protection provided by ischemic PC against I/R injuries of the lung had been reported in previous literature. In experimental guinea pig (Soncul et al., 1999), canine (Li et al., 1998b; Friedrich et al., 2001), and rabbit (Li et al., 1999; Gasparri et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2003) models, it was found that ischemic PC by blocking the pulmonary hilar blood flow can attenuate the pulmonary dysfunction related to exposure to subsequent I/R. Blockade of the pulmonary ventilation alone as the model of PC, in the rat model, can achieve similar effects as traditional ischemic PC which block both pulmonary blood flow and ventilation (Featherstone et al., 2000). There was consensus on the timings of ischemic PC, which were usually immediately before the index I/R. However, the duration or number of cycles of ischemic PC varied. In rabbit in vivo lung ischemia model lung ischemia was performed by blocking the hilum of the left lung for 10 min and then release for 15 min (Li et al., 1999). In similar rabbit model, 15 min of ischemic PC is better than 5 min of it. However, repeated cycles appear slightly better single episode of ischemic PC (Gasparri et al., 1999). In canine model, the duration of ischemic PC was 10 min (Li et al., 1998b), which was similar to the rabbit model. However, another study showed that in rabbit model ischemic PC 5 min was better than 10 min for the protection of subsequent I/R (Friedrich et al., 2001). Ischmic PC, in which the pulmonary hilum is usually clamped for 10 min with subsequent 10 min of reperfusion, has also been applied in clinical conditions, such as people undergoing major lung resection (Yang et al., 2002; Chen et al., 1999) or isolated lung perfusion with chemotherapeutic agents for unresectable cancer or metastatic sarcoma (Zhang and Chen, 2001).

The possible protective mechanisms of ischemic PC included inhibition of inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IL-6 and IL-8, with subsequent reducing activation and infiltration of neutrophils (Zhang et al., 2003), decrease of lipid peroxidation (Soncul et al., 1999), reduction of apoptosis of lung cells in vivo by upregulating bcl-2 protein expression (Yang et al., 2002), increasing production of endogenous calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) (Chen et al., 1999), reducing production of oxygen free radicals (Li et al., 1998b). In summary, ischemic PC can attenuate the I/R related changes, such as the increase in neutrophils, thromboxane B2, and malonedialdehyde, and increased superoxide dimultase and calcitonin gene-related peptide levels. Preconditioning also preserves better pulmonary functions with higher arterial oxygen tension, lower pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, and less lung injury on histological findings (Li et al., 2001).

Systemic ischemia or ischemia from remote organs could also result in pulmonary injuries after reperfusion. There are some experimental studies to reveal ischemic PC of the heart in rabbit model (Zhang et al., 1998), liver in rat model (Fernández et al., 2002; 2003), limb in sheep or pig model (Xia et al., 2003; Harkin et al., 2002) can attenuate pulmonary dysfunction after various types of reperfusion injuries, such as cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), off-pump coronary arterial bypass (OPCAB) surgery, liver transplantation, hemorrhagic shock (Pittet et al., 2002), or limb I/R.

Several types of PC other than ischemia for lung have been reported in previous literature. Hyperthermia has been applied as a common type of PC. Traditional model of hyperthermic PC in rat is 41 °C for 15 min (Huang et al., 2002; Thomas et al., 2003). However, this model would result in more cellular damage. A less severe thermal PC, using water bath to elevate core temperature by 1 °C for 15 min for 5 consecutive days, can also achieve PC protective effects (McCormick et al., 2003). Hyperthermal PC can attenuate pulmonary dysfunction after various animal models of injuries mimicking clinical conditions, such as organ transplantation, pulmonary air emboli, hemorrhagic shock, or abdominal surgery. Whole body hypoxic PC can protect mice against acute lethal hypoxia. This protection involves preservation of vital organ functions (Zhang et al., 2004) and phosphotidylinositol 3 kinase (PI-3K) plays important roles in the development of resistance against subsequent injury (Ahmad et al., 2003).

Pharmacological agents, following the discovery of related molecular mechanisms of PC, gradually replace ischemia or hyperthermia, as the specific “targeted” pretreatment methods to protect organs from various types of injuries. In rat model, PC with diethylmaleate (DEM), an intracellular pro-oxidant agent, can protect against I/R-induced lung injury (Kiely et al., 2002). Stress PC with geldanamycin in rat model could restore a normal function of the alveolar epithelium in the early phase following hemorrhagic shock by attenuating NO mediated oxidative stress to the lung epithelium (Pittet et al., 2002). In isolated lung perfusion of rat model, PC with intravenous administration of 3-nitropropionate (an inhibitor of the mitochondrial complex II) (Hirata et al., 2001), or N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC, an oxidant scavenger which promotes glutathione (GSH)) (Weinbroum et al., 2001), can prevent lung from cold or warm I/R injury. Lung reperfusion injury from ischemia of remote organ, such as intestine, can also be ameliorated by PC with pharmacological agents, such as doxorubicin, an inducer of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1, a stress protein) (Ito et al., 2003). Moreover, these protective effects could be abolished by the administration of HO-1 inhibitor, such as tin protoporphyrin (Sn-PP) (Tamion et al., 2002).

Nitric oxide (NO), a potent vasodilator which can be synthesized in various tissues (such as endothelia, neural tissues, or inflammatory cells), could also be administered as a method of pulmonary PC. In porcine lung in situ normothermic I/R model, it was found that PC with NO inhalation 10~15 min prior to ischemia can protect against pulmonary hypertension, impaired gas exchange, and the inflammatory response of pulmonary I/R injury (Waldow et al., 2004). Short term (30 min) and low dose (10×10−6) pre-ischemia NO inhalation for I/R injury in buffer-perfused rabbit lungs, subsequently undergoing 210 min of warm, anoxic ventilated ischemia. This NO PC maintains endothelial integrity in a subsequent I/R largely responsible to the nonvasodilatory and non-cGMP-related mechanisms (Schutte et al., 2001).

CONTROVERSIES IN THE RESEARCHES AND CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF PC

The mechanisms of PC have been best studied in the heart and brain. These cellular mechanisms and protective strategies are still developing in other organs, including the lung. There are still many controversies on the effects of preconditioning for the following reasons (Schulz et al., 2001b) making more related researches necessary. (1) PC phenomena has differences among species. For example, the functional role for PKC isoenzymes differs among species, with PKCε being most important in rabbits, PKCδ in rats and PKCα in dogs. It appears that results from large mammals are closer to those from humans. (2) Different experimental models (in vitro versus in vivo, anesthetized versus conscious animals) will affect the results. (3) The age of the animals or human beings will also affect the results. (4) Modes of PC, such as the cycles and duration of the preconditioning stimuli, low flow vs no flow and regional vs global ischemia will also affect the results. The site of blockade (redundant or non-redundant signaling pathway) will also yield different results. (5) The results of pharmacologic agents are valuable tools for discovering the mechanisms of PC. However, the results will be influenced by the effectiveness and specificity of the drugs for a given target at a given concentration. (6) The intraspecies differences, the rate of transfection, the redundancy of the signaling pathway should be considered in experiments on transgenic or transfective approaches.

CONCLUSION

PCs with protective roles in many organ systems against various types of injuries have been found. Their histological and molecular mechanisms have been gradually uncovered through a series of studies over the past decade. Though related studies in the lung are still much less than studies on the other organs, such as heart or brain, it is still of clinical importance to develop related researches on the lung. More experimental and clinical studies on PCs are needed to be carried out in the future to determine their benefits in attenuating subsequent organ injury.

References

  • 1.Ahmad S, Ahmad A, Gerasimovskaya E, Stenmark KR, Allen CB, White CW. Hypoxia protects human lung microvascular endothelial and epithelial-like cells against oxygen toxicity: role of phosphotidylinositol 3-kinase. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2003;28(2):179–187. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2002-0004OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aksoyek S, Cinel I, Avlan D, Cinel L, Ozturk C, Gurbuz P, Nayci A, Oral U. Intestinal ischemic preconditioning protects the intestine and reduces bacterial translocation. Shock. 2002;18:476–480. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200211000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alkhulaifi AM. Preconditioning the human heart. Ann R Coll Surg Eng. 1997;79:49–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bajt ML, Farhood A, Jaeschke H. Effects of CXC chemokines on neutrophil activation and sequestration in the hepatic vasculature. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;281:G1188–G1195. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.281.5.G1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Banerjee S, Tang XL, Qiu Y, Takano H, Manchikalapudi S, Dawn B, Shirk G, Bolli R. Nitroglycerin induces late preconditioning against myocardial stunning via a protein kinase C dependent pathway. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:H2488–H2494. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.6.H2488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barone FC, White RF, Spera PA, Ellison J, Currie RW, Wang X, Feuerstein GZ. Ischemic preconditioning and brain tolerance: temporal histological and functional outcomes, protein synthesis requirement, and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and early gene expression. Stroke. 1998;29:1937–1951. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.9.1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baxter GF, Goma FM, Yellon DM. Involvement of protein kinase C in the delayed cytoprotection following sublethal ischemia in rabbit myocardium. Br J Pharmacol. 1995;31:222–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb15866.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Becker PM, Pearse DB, Permutt S, Sylvester JT. Separate effects of ischemia and reperfusion on vascular permeability in ventilated ferret lungs. J Appl Physiol. 1992;73:2616–2620. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.6.2616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Becker PM, Buchanan W, Sylvester JT. Protective effects of intravascular pressure and nitric oxide in ischemic lung injury. J Appl Physiol. 1998;84:803–810. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.3.803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bolli R. The late phase of preconditioning. Circ Res. 2000;87:972–990. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.11.972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bolli R, Bhatti ZA, Tang XL, Qiu Y, Zhang Q, Guo Y, Jadoon AK. Evidence that late preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits is triggered by the generation of nitric oxide. Circ Res. 1997;81:42–52. doi: 10.1161/01.res.81.1.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bouchard JF, Chouinard J, Lamontagne D. Role of kinins in the endothelial protective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Br J Pharmacol. 1998;123(3):413–420. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cain BS, Meldrum DR, Cleveland JCJr, Meng X, Banerjee A, Harken AH. Clinical L-type Ca channel blockade prevents ischemic preconditioning of human myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31(12):2191–2197. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1999.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen J, Simon R. Ischemic tolerance in the brain. Neurology. 1997;48:306–311. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.2.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen G, Kelly C, Stokes K, Wang JH, Leahy A, Bouchier-Hayes D. Induction of heat shock protein 72 kDa expression is associated with attenuation of ischaemia-reperfusion induced microvascular injury. J Surg Res. 1997;69(2):435–439. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1997.5059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen S, Li G, Long L. Clinical research of ischemic preconditioning on lung protection. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 1999;24:357–359. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cleveland JCJr, Wollmering MM, Meidrum DR, Rowland RT, Rehring TF, Sheridan BC, Harken AH, Banerjee A. Ischemic preconditioning in human and rat ventricle. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H1786–H1794. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1996.271.5.H1786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cutrn JC, Perrelli MG, Cavalieri B, Peralta C, Rosell Catafau J, Poli J. Microvascular dysfunction induced by reperfusion injury and protective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;33(9):1200–1208. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)01017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Du ZY, Hicks M, Winlaw D, Spratt P, Mardonald P. Ischemic preconditioning enhances donor lung preservation in the rat. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996;15:1258–1267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Egans TM, Lambert CJJr, Reddick R, Ulicny KSJr, Keagy BA, Wilcox BR. A strategy to increase the donor pool: use of cadaver lungs for transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52:1113–1117. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(91)91290-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Featherstone RL, Chambers DJ, Kelly FJ. Ischemic preconditioning enhances recovery of isolated rat lungs after hypothermic preservation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(1):237–242. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01134-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fernández L, Heredia N, Grande L, Gómez G, Rimola A, Marco A, Gelpí E, Roselló-Catafau J, Peralta C. Preconditioning protects liver and lung damage in rat liver transplantation: role of xanthine/xanthine oxidase. Hepatology. 2002;36(3):562–572. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.34616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fernández L, Heredia N, Peralta C, Xaus C, Roselló-Catafau J, Rimola A, Macro A, Serafin A, Deulofeu R, Gelpí E, et al. Role of ischemic preconditioning and portosystemic shunt in the prevention of liver and lung damage after rat liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2003;76:282–289. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000067529.82245.4E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ferrari R. The role of mitochondria in ischemic heart disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996;28(Suppl. 1):S1–S10. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199600003-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Freshney NW, Rawlinson L, Guesdon F, Jones E, Cowley S, Hsnan J, Saklatvala J. Interleukin-1 activates a novel protein kinase cascade that results in the phosphorylation of Hsp 27. Cell. 1994;78(6):1039–1049. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90278-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Friedrich I, Spillner J, Lu EX, Bartling B, Barnscheid M, Sablotzki A, Schade U, Reidemeister JC, Silber RE, Gunther A, et al. Ischemic pre-conditioning of 5 min but not 10 min improves lung function after warm ischemia in a canine model. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20(9):985–995. doi: 10.1016/S1053-2498(01)00290-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fuller TF, Freise CE, Feng S, Niemann CU. Ischemic preconditioning improves rat kidney graft function after severe ischemia/reperfusion injury. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(1):377–378. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garlid KD, Paucek P, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Murray HN. Cardioprotective effect of diazoxide and its interaction with mitochondrial ATP sensitive K+ channels. Possible mechanism of cardioprotection. Circ Res. 1997;81:1072–1082. doi: 10.1161/01.res.81.6.1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gasparri RI, Jannis NC, Flameng WJ, Lerut TE, van Raemdonck DE. Ischemic preconditioning enhances donor lung preservation in the rabbit. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 1999;16(6):639–646. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00335-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Giannella E, Mochmann HC, Lewi R. Ischemic preconditioning prevents the impairment of hypoxic coronary vasodilatation caused by ischemia reperfusion. Role of adenosine A1/A3 and bradykinin B2 receptor activation. Circ Res. 1997;81:415–422. doi: 10.1161/01.res.81.3.415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gross GJ, Fryer RM. Sarcolemmal versus mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K+ channels and myocardial preconditioning. Circ Res. 1999;84:973–979. doi: 10.1161/01.res.84.9.973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grover GJ, Garlid KD. ATP-sensitive potassium channels: a review of their cardioprotective pharmacology. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000;32(4):677–695. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.2000.1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gujral JS, Bucci TJ, Farhood A, Jaeschke H. Mechanism of cell death during warm hepatic ischemia-reperfusion in rats: apoptosis or necrosis? Hepatology. 2001;33(2):397–405. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.22002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Guo Y, Bao W, Tang XL, Wu WJ, Bolli R. Nitric oxide donors induce late preconditioning against myocardial infarction in mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31:A11. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Guo Y, Jones WK, Xuan YT, Tang XL, Bao W, Wu WJ, Han H, Laubach VE, Ping P, Yang Z, et al. The late phase of ischemic preconditioning is abrogated by targeted disruption of the iNOS gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:11507–11512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guo Y, Bao W, Wu WJ, Shinmura K, Tang XL, Bolli R. Evidence for an essential role of cyclooxygenase-2 as a mediator of the late phase of ischemic preconditioning in mice. Basic Res Cardiol. 2000;95(6):480–485. doi: 10.1007/s003950070024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hardy KJ, Tancheroen S, Shullkes A. Comparison of continuous versus intermittent ischemia-reperfusion during liver resection in an experimental model. Br J Surg. 1995;82:833–836. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Harkin DW, Barros D’Sa AA, McCallion K, Hoper M, Campbell FC. Ischemic preconditioning before lower limb ischemia-reperfusion protects against acute lung injury. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(6):1264–1273. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hill M, Kodani E, Shinmura K, Tang XL. Nitroglycerin induces late preconditioning against myocardial infarction despite nitrate tolerance. Circulation. 2000;102(Suppl. II):II–25. doi: 10.1161/hc3201.092218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hirata T, Fukuse T, Ishikawa S, Hanaoka S, Chen Q, Shoji T, Wada H. “Chemical preconditioning” by 3-nitropropionate reduces ischemica-reperfusion injury in cardiac-arrested rat lungs. Transplantation. 2001;71:352–359. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200102150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Horiuchi T, Muraoka R, Tabo T, Uchinami M, Kimura N, Tanigawa N. Optimal cycles of hepatic ischemia and reperfusion pedicle clamping during liver surgery. Arch Surg. 1995;130:754–758. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430070076015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huang KL, Wu CP, Chen YL, Kang BH, Lin YC. Heat stress attenuates air bubble-induced acute lung injury: a novel mechanism of diving acclimatization. J Appl Physiol. 2002;94:1485–1490. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00952.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ikonomidis JS, Tumiati LC, Weisel RD, Mickel DAG, Li RK. Preconditioning human ventricular cardiomyocytes with brief periods of simulated ischemia. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:623–634. doi: 10.1093/cvr/28.8.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Isozaki H, Adam R, Gigou M, Szekely AM, Shen M, Bismuth H. Experimental study of the protective effect of intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping in the rat. Br J Surg. 1992;79(4):310–313. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ito K, Ozasa H, Kojima N, Miura M, Iwa T, Senoo H, Horikawa S. Pharmacological preconditioning protects lung injury induced by intestinal ischemia-reperfusion in rat. Shock. 2003;19:462–468. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000055240.25446.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jaeschke H. Molecular mechanisms of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury and preconditioning. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Physiol. 2003;284:G15–G26. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00342.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jaeschke H, Farhood A, Smith CW. Neutrophil-induced liver cell injury in endotoxin shock is a CD11b/CD18-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 1991;261:G1051–G1056. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1991.261.6.G1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jin ZQ, Chen X. Bradykinin mediates myocardial ischemic preconditioning against free radical injury in guinea pig isolated heart. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998;32:337–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1998.tb02346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kaeffer N, Richard V, Thuillez C. Delayed coronary endothelial protection 24 hours after preconditioning: role of free radicals. Circulation. 1997;96:2311–2316. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.7.2311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Karck M, Rahmanian P, Haverich A. Ischemic preconditioning enhances donor heart preservation. Transplantation. 1996;62:17–22. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199607150-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kiely PD, Wang JC, Kelly CJ, Condron C, Watson RG, Bouchier-Hayes DJ. Diethylmaleate, a pro-oxidant, attenuates experimental ischaemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury. Br J Surg. 2002;89(4):482–485. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kirino T. Ischemic tolerance. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:1283–1296. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200211000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kirino T, Tsujita Y, Tamura A. Induced tolerance to ischemia in gerbil hippocampal neurons. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:299–307. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kuzuya T, Hoshida S, Yamashita N, Fuji H, Oe H, Hori M, Kamada T, Tada M. Delayed effects of sublethal ischemia on the acquisition of tolerance to ischemia. Circ Res. 1993;72:1293–1299. doi: 10.1161/01.res.72.6.1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lee YC, Luh SP, Lee JM, Huang CC, Chang YL, Wu HD, Kuo SH, Chu SH. Lung transplantation—the NTUH surgical experience. Transplant Proc. 1998;30(7):3391–3392. doi: 10.1016/S0041-1345(98)01073-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li G, Chen S, Lou W, Jiang H. The protective effects of cardiac ischemic preconditioning on lung in cardiac operation with cardiopulmonary bypass. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 1998;23:41–43. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li G, Chen S, Lou W, Lu E. Ischemic preconditioning enhances donor lung preservation in canine lung transplantation. Chin Med J. 1998;111:870–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li G, Chen S, Lu F, Hu T. Ischemic preconditioning reduces lung ischemia reperfusion injury in vivo rabbits. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 1999;24:319–321. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li G, Chen S, Lu E, Luo W. Cardiac ischemic preconditioning improves lung preservation in valve replacement operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(2):631–635. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02015-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Liu GS, Thornton J, van Winkle DM, Stanley AW, Olsson RA, Downey JM. Protection against infarction afforded by preconditioning is mediated by A1 adenosine receptors in rabbit heart. Circulation. 1991;95:127–136. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.1.350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Luh SP, Tsai CC, Shau WY, Chen JS, Kuo SH, Lin-Shiau SY, Lee YC. Effects of gabexate mesilate (FOY) on ischemia-reperfusion induced acute lung injury in dogs. J Surg Res. 1999;87(2):152–163. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1999.5730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Luh SP, Tsai CC, Shau WY, Chen JS, Kuo SH, Lin-Shiau SY, Lee YC. The effects of inhaled nitric oxide, gabexate mesilate, and retrograde flush in the lung graft from non-heart beating minipig donors. Transplantation. 2000;69:2019–2027. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200005270-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Luh SP, Tsai CC, Shau WY, Chen JS, Kuo SH, Lin-Shiau SY, Yang PC. Protective effects of inhaled nitric oxide and gabexate mesilate in lung reperfusion injury after transplantation form non-heart-beat donors. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002;21(2):251–259. doi: 10.1016/S1053-2498(01)00368-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Luh SP, Yang PC, Lee CJ, Tsai TP, Wang YH. Comparison of Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate and Euro-Collins solutions for lung preservation using the minipig in situ warm ischemia model. J Formos Med Asso. 2004;103:292–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Maczewski M, Beresewicz A. The role of adenosine and ATP sensitive potassium channels in the protection afforded by ischemic preconditioning against the post ischemic endothelial dysfunction in the guinea pig hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998;30(9):1735–1747. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1998.0736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Marber MS, Latchman DS, Walker JM, Yellon DM. Cardiac stress protein elevation 24 hours after brief ischemia or heat stress is associated with resistance to myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993;88:1264–1272. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.3.1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Matsuyama K, Chiba Y, Ihaya A, Kimura T, Tanigawa N, Muraoka R. Effect of spinal cord preconditioning on paraplegia during cross-clamping of the thoracic aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(5):1315–1320. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00104-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.McCallion K, Wattanasirichaigoon S, Gardiner KR, Fink MP. Ischemic preconditioning ameliorates ischemia and reperfusion induced hyperpermeability in rat. Shock. 2000;14:429–434. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200014040-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.McCormick PH, Chen G, Tlerney S, Kelly CJ, Bouchier-Hayes DJ. Clinically relevant thermal preconditioning attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Surg Res. 2003;109(1):24–30. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4804(02)00035-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Muller DWM, Topol EJ, Califf RM, Sigmon KN, Gorman L. Relationship between antecedent angina pectoris and short term prognosis after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1990;119:224–231. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(05)80008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986;74:1124–1136. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.5.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Murry CE, Richard VJ, Reimer KA, Jennings RB. Ischemic preconditioning slows energy metabolism and delays ultrastructural damage during a sustained ischemic episode. Circ Res. 1990;66:913–931. doi: 10.1161/01.res.66.4.913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nandagopal K, Dawson TM, Dawson VL. Critical role for nitric oxide signaling in cardiac and neuronal ischemic preconditioning and tolerance. JPET. 2001;297:474–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Neely CF, Keith IM. A1 adenosine receptor antagonists block ischemia-reperfusion injury of the lung. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:L1036–L1046. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1995.268.6.L1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Olguner C, Koca U, Kar A, Karci A, Islekel H, Canyilmaz M, Mavioglu O, Kizildag S, Unlo G, Elar Z. Ischemic preconditioning attenuates the lipid preoxidation and remote lung injury in the rat model of unilateral lower limb ischemia reperfusion. Acta Anesthesiol Scand. 2006;50(2):150–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00938.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Papanastasiou S, Estdale SE, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Mathie RT. Protective effect of preconditioning and adenosine pretreatment in experimental skeletal muscle reperfusion injury. Br J Surg. 1999;86(7):916–922. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Peralta C, Prats N, Xaus C, Gelpi E, Rosello-Catafau J. Protective effect of liver ischemic preconditioning on liver and lung injury induced by hepatic ischemia-reperfusion in the rat. Hepatology. 1999;30(6):1481–1489. doi: 10.1002/hep.510300622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ping P, Zhang J, Zheng YT, Li RC, Dawn B, Tang XL, Takano H, Balafanova Z, Bolli R. Demonstration of selective, PKC-dependent activation of Src and Lck tyrosine kinases during ischemic preconditioning in conscious rabbits. Circ Res. 1999;85:542–550. doi: 10.1161/01.res.85.6.542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ping P, Zhang J, Huang S, Cao X, Tang XL, Li RC, Zheng YT, Qiu Y, Clerk A, Sugden P, et al. PKCξ-dependent activation of p46 and p54 JNKs during ischemic preconditioning in conscious rabbits. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:H1771–H1785. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.5.H1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pittet JF, Lu LN, Geiser T, Lee H, Matthay MA, Welch WJ. Stress preconditioning attenuates oxidative injury to the alveolar epithelium of the lung following haemorrhage in rats. J Physiol. 2002;538(Pt 2):583–597. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Plumier JCL, Ross BM, Currie RW, Angelidis CE, Kazlaris H, Kollias G, Pagoulatos GN. Transgenic mice expressing the human heat shock protein-70 have improved postischemic myocardial recovery. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1854–1860. doi: 10.1172/JCI117865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pomerantz BJ, Joo K, Shames BD, Cleveland JCJr, Banerjee A, Harken AH. Adenosine preconditioning reduces both pre and postischemic arrhythmias in human myocardium. J Surg Res. 2000;90(2):191–196. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2000.5889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Post H, Schultz R, Behrends M, Gres P, Umschlag C, Heusch G. No involvement of endogenous nitric oxide in classical ischemic preconditioning in swine. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000;32(5):725–733. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.2000.1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Qian YZ, Bernardo NL, Nayeem MA, Chelliah J, Kukreja RC. Induction of 72-kDa heat shock protein does not produce second window of ischemic preconditioning in rat heart. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:H224–H234. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.276.1.H224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Qiu Y, Rizvi A, Tang XL, Manchikalapudi S, Takano H, Jadoon AK, Wu WJ, Bolli R. Nitric oxide triggers late preconditioning against myocardial infarction in conscious rabbits. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H2931–H2936. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.273.6.H2931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Qiu Y, Ping P, Tang XL, Manchikalapudi S, Rizvi A, Zung J, Takano H, Wu WJ, Teschner S, Bolli R. Direct evidence that protein kinase C plays an essential role in the development of late preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits and the ξ is the isoform involved. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:2182–2198. doi: 10.1172/JCI1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Radford NB, Fina M, Benjamin IJ, Moreadith RW, Graves KH, Zhao PY, Gavva S, Wiethoff A, Sherry AD, Malloy CR, et al. Cardioprotective effects of 70-kDa heat shock protein in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:2339–2342. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.6.2339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Raeburn CD, Cleveland JCJr, Zimmerman MA, Harken AH. Organ preconditioning. Arch Surg. 2001;136(11):1263–1266. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.11.1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sawaya DE, Zibari GB, Minardi A, Bilton B, Burney D, Granger DN, McDonald JC, Zibari GB. P-selectin contributes to the initial recruitment of rolling and adherent leukocytes in hepatic venules after ischemia-reperfusion. Shock. 1999;12:227–232. doi: 10.1097/00024382-199909000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Schulz R, Post H, Vahlhaus C, Heusch G. Ischemic preconditioning in pigs: a graded phenomenon. Its relation to adenosine and bradykinin. Circulation. 1998;98:1022–1029. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.10.1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Schulz R, Gres P, Heusch G. Role of endogenous opioids in ischemic preconditioning but not in short-term hibernation in pigs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;280:H2175–H2181. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.5.H2175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Schulz R, Cohen MV, Behrends M, Downey JM, Heusch G. Signal transduction of ischemic preconditioning. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;52(2):181–198. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00384-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Schutte H, Witzenrath M, Mayer K, Rosseau S, Seeger W, Grimminger F. Short-term “preconditioning” with inhaled nitric oxide protects rabbit lungs against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Transplantation. 2001;72(8):1363–1370. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200110270-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Seeger W, Walmrath D, Brimminger F, Rosseau S, Schutte H, Kramer HJ, Ermert L, Kiss L. Adult respiratory distress syndrome: model systems using isolated perfused rabbit lungs. Methods Enzymol. 1994;233:549–555. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(94)33060-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sharp FR, Ran R, Lu A, Tang Y, Strauss P, Glass T, Ardizzone T, Bernaudin M. Hypoxic preconditioning protects against ischemic brain injury. NeuroRx. 2004;1(1):26–35. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.1.1.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Shiki K, Hearse DJ. Preconditioning of ischemic myocardium: reperfusion-induced arrhythmia. Am J Physiol. 1987;253:H1470–H1476. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1987.253.6.H1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Shinmura K, Tang XL, Wang Y, Xuan YT, Liu SQ, Takano H, Bhatnagar A, Bolli R. Cyclooxygenase-2 mediates the cardioprotective effects of the late phase of ischemic preconditioning in conscious rabbits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:10197–10202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.18.10197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Soncul H, Oz E, Kalaycioglu S. Role of ischemic preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury of the lung. Chest. 1999;115(6):1672–1677. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.6.1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Sun JZ, Tang XL, Knowlton AA, Park SW, Qiu Y, Bolli R. Late preconditioning against myocardial stunning: an endogenous protective mechanism that confers resistance to postischemic dysfunction 24 h after brief ischemia in conscious pigs. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:388–403. doi: 10.1172/JCI117667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Sun JZ, Tang XL, Park SW, Qiu Y, Turrens JF, Bolli R. Evidence for an essential role of reactive oxygen species in the genesis of late preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious pigs. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:562–576. doi: 10.1172/JCI118449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Takano H, Manchikalapudi S, Tang XL, Qiu Y, Rizvi A, Jadoon A, Zhang Q, Bolli R. Nitric oxide synthase is the mediator of delayed preconditioning against myocardial infarction in conscious rabbits. Circulation. 1998;98:441–449. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.5.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Tamion F, Richard V, Lacoume Y, Thuillez C. Intestinal preconditioning prevents systemic inflammatory response in hemorrahgic shock. Role of HO-1. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002;283:G408–G414. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00348.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Tamura K, Tsuji H, Nishiue T, Tokunaga S, Iwasaka T. Association of preceding angina with in-hospital life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia and late potentials in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1997;133(3):297–301. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(97)70223-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Tang XL, Rizvi AN, Qiu Y, Takano H, Zhang Q, Guo Y, Bolli R. Evidence that the hydroxyl radical triggers late preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits. Circulation. 1997;96(Suppl. I):I–255. [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Thomas S, Pulimood A, Balasubramanian KA. Heat preconditioning prevents oxidative stress-induced damage in the intestine and lung following surgical manipulation. Br J Surg. 2003;90(4):473–481. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Tyagi P, Tayal G. Ischemic preconditioning of myocardium. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2002;23:865–870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Waldow T, Alexiou K, Witt W, Wagner FM, Gulielmos V, Matschke K, Knaut M. Attenuation of reperfusion induced systemic inflammation by preconditioning with nitric oxide in situ porcine model of normothermic lung ischemia. Chest. 2004;125(6):2253–2259. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.6.2253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Walker DM, Walker JM, Pugsley WB, Pattison CW, Yellon DM. Preconditioning in isolated superfused human muscle. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995;27(6):1349–1357. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2828(05)82397-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Wang Y, Zhang S, Guo Y, Bao W, Wu J, Bolli R. Ischemic preconditioning (PC) upregulates inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), but not eNOS, in cardiac myocytes in vivo. Circulation. 2000;102(Suppl. II):II–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Weinbroum AA, Kluger Y, BenAbraham R, Shapira I, Karchevski E, Rudick V. Lung preconditioning with N-acetyl-L-cysteine prevents reperfusion injury after liver no flow-reflow: a dose response study. Transplantation. 2001;71:300–306. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200101270-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Witthaut R, Farhood A, Smith CW, Jaeschke H. Complement and tumor necrosis factor-α contribute to Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) upregulation and systemic neutrophil activation during endotoxemia in vivo. J Leukoc Biol. 1994;55:105–111. doi: 10.1002/jlb.55.1.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Xia Z, Herijgers P, Nishida T, Ozaki S, Wouters P, Flameng W. Remote preconditioning lessens the deterioration of pulmonary function after repeated coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion in sheep. Can J Aneaesth. 2003;50:481–488. doi: 10.1007/BF03021061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Yamashita N, Hoshida S, Nishida M, Igarashi J, Aoki K, Hori M, Kuzuya T, Tada M. Time course of tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion injury and induction of heat shock protein 72 by heat stress in rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997;29(7):1815–1821. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1997.0416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Yamashita N, Hoshida S, Taniguchi N, Kuzuya T, Hori MA. “Second window of protection” occurs 24 h after ischemic preconditioning in the rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998;30(6):1181–1189. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1998.0682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Yang Y, Chen SX, Zhang WX. Effect of ischemic preconditioning on human lung cell apoptosis in vivo and the expression of regulation gene bcl-2. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2002;27:43–45. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Yellon DM, Alkhulaifi AM, Pugsley WB. Preconditioning of the human myocardium. The Lancet. 1993;342(8866):276–277. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91819-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Zhang CF, Chen SX. Clinical study of ischemic preconditioning on isolated lung perfusion with chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of unresectable lung cancer. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2001;28:51–54. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Zhang P, Xie M, Zagorski J, Spitzer JA. Attenuation of hepatic neutrophil sequestration by anti-CINC antibody in endotoxic rats. Shock. 1995;4:262–268. doi: 10.1097/00024382-199510000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Zhang W, Cheng S, Hu J. Influence of ischemic preconditioning of heart on ischemia/reperfusion injury of the lung. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 1998;23:432–434. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zhang T, Zhang F, Zhou YA, Wang YJ, Li XF, Chen DF. Effect of ischemic preconditioning on cytokines during lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2003;41:545–547. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zhang SXL, Miller JJ, Gozal D, Wang Y. Whole-body hypoxic preconditioning protects mice against acute hypoxia by improving lung function. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(1):392–397. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00829.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B are provided here courtesy of Zhejiang University Press

RESOURCES