Skip to main content
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
. 1984 Jun;17(6):729–734. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02410.x

Comparison of two long-acting forms of quinidine.

A Leizorovicz, C Piolat, J P Boissel, B Sanchini, S Ferry
PMCID: PMC1463434  PMID: 6743467

Abstract

The bioequivalence of two forms of long acting quinidine compounds was assessed (Kinidin durules and Longacor) using drug plasma level and QT ECG changes. Six healthy volunteers received each preparation on two occasions in random order. The wash out period between successive experiments was at least 7 days. There was no difference in tmax, Cmax and AUC for plasma level and adjusted QT. However, between patient variability was large. A 20% difference in plasma levels could not be excluded but the difference in QT max and QT AUC between the two preparations did not exceed 20% (P less than 0.05, Westlake's method). This study illustrates the fact that pharmacodynamic equivalence, let alone therapeutic equivalence, does not necessarily imply plasma level equivalence, as assessed by the current method.

Full text

PDF
729

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boissel J. P., Wolf E., Gillet J., Soubrane A., Cavallaro A., Mazoyer G., Delahaye J. P. Controlled trial of a long-acting quinidine for maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion of sustained atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 1981 Feb;2(1):49–55. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonora M. R., Guentert T. W., Upton R. A., Riegelman S. Determination of quinidine and metabolites in urine by reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography. Clin Chim Acta. 1979 Feb 1;91(3):277–284. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(79)90484-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frigo G. M., Perucca E., Teggia-Droghi M., Gatti G., Mussini A., Salerno J. Comparison of quinidine plasma concentration curves following oral administration of some short- and long-acting formulations. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1977 Aug;4(4):449–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1977.tb00760.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guentert T. W., Coates P. E., Upton R. A., Combs D. L., Riegelman S. Determination of quinidine and its major metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. 1979 Jan 1;162(1):59–70. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)82063-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Metzler C. M. Bioavailability--a problem in equivalence. Biometrics. 1974 Jun;30(2):309–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ochs H. R., Greenblatt D. J., Woo E. Clinical pharmacokinetics of quinidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1980 Mar-Apr;5(2):150–168. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198005020-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Renais J., Scebat L., Lenègre J. Etude des taux de quinidinémie obtenus par l'administration d'une quinidine retard. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1971 May;64(5):701–711. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Westlake W. J. Symmetrical confidence intervals for bioequivalence trials. Biometrics. 1976 Dec;32(4):741–744. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES