Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1997 Feb 1;25(3):458–466. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.3.458

The AT-rich flanks of the oocyte-type 5S RNA gene of Xenopus laevis act as a strong local signal for histone H1-mediated chromatin reorganization in vitro.

R Tomaszewski 1, A Jerzmanowski 1
PMCID: PMC146468  PMID: 9016582

Abstract

In vivo, histone H1 plays an active role in establishing the transcriptionally repressed chromatin state of the oocyte-type 5S RNA genes in the early stages of Xenopus development. By using fully defined in vitro system of chromatin assembly on plasmids with cloned oocyte- or somatic-type 5S gene repeats we found that the oocyte repeat which comprises a 120 bp oocyte-type 5S RNA gene placed within the few hundred bp long native AT-rich flanks, but not the somatic repeat (a similar 120 bp somatic-type 5S RNA gene placed within native GC-rich flanks) enables histone H1 to realign the nucleosomal core particles densely packed on plasmid DNA. The realignment results in creation of the repeat unit of approximately 240 bp and is achieved through complete removal of several core histone complexes from plasmid template with the oocyte-type repeat. This effect of H1 is independent on the plasmid sequences and seems to be solely due to the presence in the oocyte-repeat of the AT-rich flanks. The effects of H1 are completely suppressed by distamycin A, a drug that specifically recognizes and binds oligo(dA).oligo(dT) runs in DNA. The binding of H1 results in increased protection of DNA sites within the AT-rich oocyte-type 5S repeat. In an in vitro transcription assay performed with reconstituted chromatin templates containing plasmids with the oocyte- or somatic-type repeats only the transcription of the oocyte-type 5S RNA gene was repressed in the presence of physiological concentration of histone H1. These results support the view that the AT-rich flanks of the oocyte-type 5S RNA gene are involved in histone H1-mediated chromatin reorganization that results in the transcriptional repression observed in vivo.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (217.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bouvet P., Dimitrov S., Wolffe A. P. Specific regulation of Xenopus chromosomal 5S rRNA gene transcription in vivo by histone H1. Genes Dev. 1994 May 15;8(10):1147–1159. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.10.1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowater R., Aboul-Ela F., Lilley D. M. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of circular DNA topoisomers. Methods Enzymol. 1992;212:105–120. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)12007-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chipev C. C., Wolffe A. P. Chromosomal organization of Xenopus laevis oocyte and somatic 5S rRNA genes in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jan;12(1):45–55. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cole R. D. Purification and analysis of H1 histones. Methods Enzymol. 1989;170:524–532. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(89)70062-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dignam J. D., Lebovitz R. M., Roeder R. G. Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Mar 11;11(5):1475–1489. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.5.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dignam J. D., Martin P. L., Shastry B. S., Roeder R. G. Eukaryotic gene transcription with purified components. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:582–598. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01039-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dimitrov S., Almouzni G., Dasso M., Wolffe A. P. Chromatin transitions during early Xenopus embryogenesis: changes in histone H4 acetylation and in linker histone type. Dev Biol. 1993 Nov;160(1):214–227. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dimitrov S., Wolffe A. P. Chromatin and nuclear assembly: experimental approaches towards the reconstitution of transcriptionally active and silent states. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995 Jan 2;1260(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(94)00182-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dworkin-Rastl E., Kandolf H., Smith R. C. The maternal histone H1 variant, H1M (B4 protein), is the predominant H1 histone in Xenopus pregastrula embryos. Dev Biol. 1994 Feb;161(2):425–439. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fukuma M., Hiraoka Y., Sakurai H., Fukasawa T. Purification of yeast histones competent for nucleosome assembly in vitro. Yeast. 1994 Mar;10(3):319–331. doi: 10.1002/yea.320100305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Germond J. E., Hirt B., Oudet P., Gross-Bellark M., Chambon P. Folding of the DNA double helix in chromatin-like structures from simian virus 40. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 May;72(5):1843–1847. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.5.1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jeong S. W., Lauderdale J. D., Stein A. Chromatin assembly on plasmid DNA in vitro. Apparent spreading of nucleosome alignment from one region of pBR327 by histone H5. J Mol Biol. 1991 Dec 20;222(4):1131–1147. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90597-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jerzmanowski A., Cole R. D. Flanking sequences of Xenopus 5 S RNA genes determine differential inhibition of transcription by H1 histone in vitro. Mitotic phosphorylation of H1 decreases its inhibitory power. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jun 25;265(18):10726–10732. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kamakaka R. T., Bulger M., Kadonaga J. T. Potentiation of RNA polymerase II transcription by Gal4-VP16 during but not after DNA replication and chromatin assembly. Genes Dev. 1993 Sep;7(9):1779–1795. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.9.1779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kandolf H. The H1A histone variant is an in vivo repressor of oocyte-type 5S gene transcription in Xenopus laevis embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):7257–7261. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Keller W. Determination of the number of superhelical turns in simian virus 40 DNA by gel electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Dec;72(12):4876–4880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.12.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Käs E., Izaurralde E., Laemmli U. K. Specific inhibition of DNA binding to nuclear scaffolds and histone H1 by distamycin. The role of oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tracts. J Mol Biol. 1989 Dec 5;210(3):587–599. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90134-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lauderdale J. D., Stein A. Effects of plasmid length and positioned nucleosomes on chromatin assembly in vitro. Biochemistry. 1993 Jan 19;32(2):489–499. doi: 10.1021/bi00053a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. O'Neill T. E., Meersseman G., Pennings S., Bradbury E. M. Deposition of histone H1 onto reconstituted nucleosome arrays inhibits both initiation and elongation of transcripts by T7 RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Mar 25;23(6):1075–1082. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.6.1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Peck L. J., Millstein L., Eversole-Cire P., Gottesfeld J. M., Varshavsky A. Transcriptionally inactive oocyte-type 5S RNA genes of Xenopus laevis are complexed with TFIIIA in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;7(10):3503–3510. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.10.3503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pfaffle P., Jackson V. Studies on rates of nucleosome formation with DNA under stress. J Biol Chem. 1990 Oct 5;265(28):16821–16829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rodríguez-Campos A., Shimamura A., Worcel A. Assembly and properties of chromatin containing histone H1. J Mol Biol. 1989 Sep 5;209(1):135–150. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90177-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schlissel M. S., Brown D. D. The transcriptional regulation of Xenopus 5s RNA genes in chromatin: the roles of active stable transcription complexes and histone H1. Cell. 1984 Jul;37(3):903–913. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90425-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith R. C., Dworkin-Rastl E., Dworkin M. B. Expression of a histone H1-like protein is restricted to early Xenopus development. Genes Dev. 1988 Oct;2(10):1284–1295. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.10.1284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stein A., Bina M. A model chromatin assembly system. Factors affecting nucleosome spacing. J Mol Biol. 1984 Sep 15;178(2):341–363. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90148-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stein A. Reconstitution of chromatin from purified components. Methods Enzymol. 1989;170:585–603. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(89)70066-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Varga-Weisz P. D., Blank T. A., Becker P. B. Energy-dependent chromatin accessibility and nucleosome mobility in a cell-free system. EMBO J. 1995 May 15;14(10):2209–2216. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07215.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES