Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1997 Apr 1;25(7):1412–1418. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.7.1412

The effect of ionic conditions on DNA helical repeat, effective diameter and free energy of supercoiling.

V V Rybenkov 1, A V Vologodskii 1, N R Cozzarelli 1
PMCID: PMC146597  PMID: 9060437

Abstract

We determined the free energy of DNA supercoiling as a function of the concentration of magnesium and sodium chloride in solution by measuring the variance of the equilibrium distribution of DNA linking number,<(DeltaLk)2>. We found that the free energy of supercoiling changed >1.5-fold over the range of ionic conditions studied. Comparison of the experimental results with those of computer simulations showed that the ionic condition dependence of<(DeltaLk)2>is due mostly to the change in DNA effective diameter, d, a parameter characterizing the electrostatic interaction of DNA segments. To make this comparison we determined values of d under all ionic conditions studied by measuring the probability of knot formation during random cyclization of linear DNA molecules. From the topoisomer distributions we could also determine the changes in DNA helical repeat, gamma, in mixed NaCl/MgCl2 solutions. Both gamma and d exhibited a complex pattern of changes with changing ionic conditions, which can be described in terms of competition between magnesium and sodium ions for binding to DNA.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (150.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aboul-ela F., Bowater R. P., Lilley D. M. Competing B-Z and helix-coil conformational transitions in supercoiled plasmid DNA. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jan 25;267(3):1776–1785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson P., Bauer W. Supercoiling in closed circular DNA: dependence upon ion type and concentration. Biochemistry. 1978 Feb 21;17(4):594–601. doi: 10.1021/bi00597a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barzilai R. SV40 DNA: quantitative conversion of closed circular to open circular form by an ethidium bromide-restricted endonuclease. J Mol Biol. 1973 Mar 15;74(4):739–742. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90062-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer W. R. Structure and reactions of closed duplex DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1978;7:287–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.07.060178.001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bednar J., Furrer P., Stasiak A., Dubochet J., Egelman E. H., Bates A. D. The twist, writhe and overall shape of supercoiled DNA change during counterion-induced transition from a loosely to a tightly interwound superhelix. Possible implications for DNA structure in vivo. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 21;235(3):825–847. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benham C. J. The statistics of superhelicity. J Mol Biol. 1978 Aug 15;123(3):361–370. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90084-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boles T. C., White J. H., Cozzarelli N. R. Structure of plectonemically supercoiled DNA. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):931–951. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80272-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brian A. A., Frisch H. L., Lerman L. S. Thermodynamics and equilibrium sedimentation analysis of the close approach of DNA molecules and a molecular ordering transition. Biopolymers. 1981 Jun;20(6):1305–1328. doi: 10.1002/bip.1981.360200615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Depew D. E., Wang J. C. Conformational fluctuations of DNA helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4275–4279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Duguet M. The helical repeat of DNA at high temperature. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Feb 11;21(3):463–468. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.3.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dynan W. S., Jendrisak J. J., Hager D. A., Burgess R. R. Purification and characterization of wheat germ DNA topoisomerase I (nicking-closing enzyme). J Biol Chem. 1981 Jun 10;256(11):5860–5865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellison M. J., Feigon J., Kelleher R. J., 3rd, Wang A. H., Habener J. F., Rich A. An assessment of the Z-DNA forming potential of alternating dA-dT stretches in supercoiled plasmids. Biochemistry. 1986 Jun 17;25(12):3648–3655. doi: 10.1021/bi00360a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellison M. J., Kelleher R. J., 3rd, Wang A. H., Habener J. F., Rich A. Sequence-dependent energetics of the B-Z transition in supercoiled DNA containing nonalternating purine-pyrimidine sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8320–8324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Frank-Kamenetskii M. D., Lukashin A. V., Anshelevich V. V., Vologodskii A. V. Torsional and bending rigidity of the double helix from data on small DNA rings. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1985 Feb;2(5):1005–1012. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1985.10507616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gebe J. A., Delrow J. J., Heath P. J., Fujimoto B. S., Stewart D. W., Schurr J. M. Effects of Na+ and Mg2+ on the structures of supercoiled DNAs: comparison of simulations with experiments. J Mol Biol. 1996 Sep 20;262(2):105–128. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hagerman P. J. Flexibility of DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:265–286. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Heath P. J., Clendenning J. B., Fujimoto B. S., Schurr J. M. Effect of bending strain on the torsion elastic constant of DNA. J Mol Biol. 1996 Aug 2;260(5):718–730. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Horowitz D. S., Wang J. C. Torsional rigidity of DNA and length dependence of the free energy of DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1984 Feb 15;173(1):75–91. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90404-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Klenin K. V., Vologodskii A. V., Anshelevich V. V., Dykhne A. M., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Computer simulation of DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1991 Feb 5;217(3):413–419. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90745-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Klenin K. V., Vologodskii A. V., Anshelevich V. V., Dykhne A. M., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Effect of excluded volume on topological properties of circular DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1988 Jun;5(6):1173–1185. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1988.10506462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Klenin K. V., Vologodskii A. V., Anshelevich V. V., Klishko VYu, Dykhne A. M., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Variance of writhe for wormlike DNA rings with excluded volume. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989 Feb;6(4):707–714. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1989.10507731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krasnow M. A., Cozzarelli N. R. Catenation of DNA rings by topoisomerases. Mechanism of control by spermidine. J Biol Chem. 1982 Mar 10;257(5):2687–2693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Le Bret M. Monte Carlo computation of the supercoiling energy, the sedimentation constant, and the radius of gyration of unknotted and knotted circular DNA. Biopolymers. 1980 Mar;19(3):619–637. doi: 10.1002/bip.1980.360190312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee C. H., Mizusawa H., Kakefuda T. Unwinding of double-stranded DNA helix by dehydration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May;78(5):2838–2842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Levene S. D., Crothers D. M. Topological distributions and the torsional rigidity of DNA. A Monte Carlo study of DNA circles. J Mol Biol. 1986 May 5;189(1):73–83. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90382-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mirkin S. M., Lyamichev V. I., Kumarev V. P., Kobzev V. F., Nosikov V. V., Vologodskii A. V. The energetics of the B-Z transition in DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1987 Aug;5(1):79–88. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1987.10506376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Paulsen M. D., Anderson C. F., Record M. T., Jr Counterion exchange reactions on DNA: Monte Carlo and Poisson-Boltzmann analysis. Biopolymers. 1988 Aug;27(8):1249–1265. doi: 10.1002/bip.360270806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peck L. J., Wang J. C. Energetics of B-to-Z transition in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(20):6206–6210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.20.6206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pulleyblank D. E., Shure M., Tang D., Vinograd J., Vosberg H. P. Action of nicking-closing enzyme on supercoiled and nonsupercoiled closed circular DNA: formation of a Boltzmann distribution of topological isomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4280–4284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rybenkov V. V., Cozzarelli N. R., Vologodskii A. V. Probability of DNA knotting and the effective diameter of the DNA double helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 1;90(11):5307–5311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shaw S. Y., Wang J. C. Knotting of a DNA chain during ring closure. Science. 1993 Apr 23;260(5107):533–536. doi: 10.1126/science.8475384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shibata J. H., Fujimoto B. S., Schurr J. M. Rotational dynamics of DNA from 10(-10) to 10(-5) seconds: comparison of theory with optical experiments. Biopolymers. 1985 Oct;24(10):1909–1930. doi: 10.1002/bip.360241006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shimada J., Yamakawa H. Moments for DNA topoisomers: the helical wormlike chain. Biopolymers. 1988 Apr;27(4):657–673. doi: 10.1002/bip.360270409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shore D., Baldwin R. L. Energetics of DNA twisting. II. Topoisomer analysis. J Mol Biol. 1983 Nov 15;170(4):983–1007. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shure M., Vinograd J. The number of superhelical turns in native virion SV40 DNA and minicol DNA determined by the band counting method. Cell. 1976 Jun;8(2):215–226. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stigter D. Interactions of highly charged colloidal cylinders with applications to double-stranded. Biopolymers. 1977 Jul;16(7):1435–1448. doi: 10.1002/bip.1977.360160705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Taylor W. H., Hagerman P. J. Application of the method of phage T4 DNA ligase-catalyzed ring-closure to the study of DNA structure. II. NaCl-dependence of DNA flexibility and helical repeat. J Mol Biol. 1990 Mar 20;212(2):363–376. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90131-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Thomas J. C., Allison S. A., Appellof C. J., Schurr J. M. Torison dynamics and depolarization of fluorescence of linear macromolecules. II. Fluorescence polarization anisotropy measurements on a clean viral phi 29 DNA. Biophys Chem. 1980 Oct;12(2):177–188. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(80)80050-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Vologodskii A. V., Cozzarelli N. R. Conformational and thermodynamic properties of supercoiled DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:609–643. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.003141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vologodskii A. V., Lukashin A. V., Anshelevich V. V., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Fluctuations in superhelical DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Mar;6(3):967–982. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.3.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vologodskii A., Cozzarelli N. Modeling of long-range electrostatic interactions in DNA. Biopolymers. 1995 Mar;35(3):289–296. doi: 10.1002/bip.360350304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang J. C., Peck L. J., Becherer K. DNA supercoiling and its effects on DNA structure and function. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):85–91. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang J. C. Variation of the average rotation angle of the DNA helix and the superhelical turns of covalently closed cyclic lambda DNA. J Mol Biol. 1969 Jul 14;43(1):25–39. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90076-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wasserman S. A., White J. H., Cozzarelli N. R. The helical repeat of double-stranded DNA varies as a function of catenation and supercoiling. Nature. 1988 Aug 4;334(6181):448–450. doi: 10.1038/334448a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yarmola E. G., Zarudnaya M. I., Lazurkin YuS Osmotic pressure of DNA solutions and effective diameter of the double helix. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1985 Feb;2(5):981–993. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1985.10507614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES