Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1998 Jul;193(Pt 1):35–48. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19310035.x

Morphological and quantitative studies in the otic region of the neural tube in chick embryos suggest a neuroectodermal origin for the otic placode

RAQUEL MAYORDOMO 1, LUCÍA RODRÍGUEZ-GALLARDO 1, IGNACIO S ALVAREZ 1,✉
PMCID: PMC1467821  PMID: 9758135

Abstract

Careful histological observation of the development of the anlage of the inner ear in chicken embryos led us to question the traditional view of otic placode (OP) formation. First, morphological studies in the cephalic region carried out on stages preceding the appearance of the placodal epithelium revealed that the medial placodal cells are continuous temporally and spatially with cells belonging to the neural fold (NF). Second, both the formation of the basal lamina between the dorsal region of the neural tube (NT) and ectoderm and the pattern of formation of the neural crest present distinctive characteristics between otic levels and regions located anteriorly and posteriorly. Third, numerical comparisons of parameters for the NT and the OP between different levels of the rhombencephalon allowed us to assign a differential behaviour in the growth pattern of the otic region. These results indicated that the medial part of the OP is not derived from already independent ectoderm that increases in thickness under the influence of the NT (as previously accepted) but that it develops directly from the NFs. Although we do not exclude other possibilities, we propose that at least a proportion of the OP cells originate directly from cells committed to be neural crest. After this incorporation, basal laminal formation would delimit the NT from the OP without transition of the otic cells to ectoderm. This hypothesis would imply that part of the otic cells originate directly from neuroepithelial cells having a neuroectodermal (rather than the previously established ectodermal) origin.

Keywords: Neural tube, neural crest, basal lamina

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alvarez I. S., Martín-Partido G., Rodríguez-Gallardo L., González-Ramos C., Navascués J. Cell proliferation during early development of the chick embryo otic anlage: quantitative comparison of migratory and nonmigratory regions of the otic epithelium. J Comp Neurol. 1989 Dec 8;290(2):278–288. doi: 10.1002/cne.902900208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarez I. S., Navascués J. Shaping, invagination, and closure of the chick embryo otic vesicle: scanning electron microscopic and quantitative study. Anat Rec. 1990 Nov;228(3):315–326. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092280311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birgbauer E., Sechrist J., Bronner-Fraser M., Fraser S. Rhombomeric origin and rostrocaudal reassortment of neural crest cells revealed by intravital microscopy. Development. 1995 Apr;121(4):935–945. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.4.935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bissonnette J. P., Fekete D. M. Standard atlas of the gross anatomy of the developing inner ear of the chicken. J Comp Neurol. 1996 May 13;368(4):620–630. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960513)368:4<620::AID-CNE12>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bronner-Fraser M. Neural crest cell formation and migration in the developing embryo. FASEB J. 1994 Jul;8(10):699–706. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.8.10.8050668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carney P. R., Silver J. Studies on cell migration and axon guidance in the developing distal auditory system of the mouse. J Comp Neurol. 1983 Apr 20;215(4):359–369. doi: 10.1002/cne.902150402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Couly G. F., Le Douarin N. M. Mapping of the early neural primordium in quail-chick chimeras. I. Developmental relationships between placodes, facial ectoderm, and prosencephalon. Dev Biol. 1985 Aug;110(2):422–439. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90101-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Couly G., Le Douarin N. M. Head morphogenesis in embryonic avian chimeras: evidence for a segmental pattern in the ectoderm corresponding to the neuromeres. Development. 1990 Apr;108(4):543–558. doi: 10.1242/dev.108.4.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. D'Amico-Martel A., Noden D. M. Contributions of placodal and neural crest cells to avian cranial peripheral ganglia. Am J Anat. 1983 Apr;166(4):445–468. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001660406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gallagher B. C., Henry J. J., Grainger R. M. Inductive processes leading to inner ear formation during Xenopus development. Dev Biol. 1996 Apr 10;175(1):95–107. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerchman E., Hilfer S. R., Brown J. W. Involvement of extracellular matrix in the formation of the inner ear. Dev Dyn. 1995 Apr;202(4):421–432. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002020411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gumbiner B. M. Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell. 1996 Feb 9;84(3):345–357. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81279-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haddon C., Lewis J. Early ear development in the embryo of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. J Comp Neurol. 1996 Jan 29;365(1):113–128. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960129)365:1<113::AID-CNE9>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hemond S. G., Morest D. K. Ganglion formation from the otic placode and the otic crest in the chick embryo: mitosis, migration, and the basal lamina. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1991;184(1):1–13. doi: 10.1007/BF01744256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hilfer S. R., Esteves R. A., Sanzo J. F. Invagination of the otic placode: normal development and experimental manipulation. J Exp Zool. 1989 Aug;251(2):253–264. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402510213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jeffs P., Jaques K., Osmond M. Cell death in cranial neural crest development. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1992;185(6):583–588. doi: 10.1007/BF00185617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones F. S., Prediger E. A., Bittner D. A., De Robertis E. M., Edelman G. M. Cell adhesion molecules as targets for Hox genes: neural cell adhesion molecule promoter activity is modulated by cotransfection with Hox-2.5 and -2.4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Mar 15;89(6):2086–2090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.6.2086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lumsden A., Krumlauf R. Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science. 1996 Nov 15;274(5290):1109–1115. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5290.1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lumsden A., Sprawson N., Graham A. Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development. 1991 Dec;113(4):1281–1291. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.4.1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lumsden A. The cellular basis of segmentation in the developing hindbrain. Trends Neurosci. 1990 Aug;13(8):329–335. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90144-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Martins-Green M., Erickson C. A. Basal lamina is not a barrier to neural crest cell emigration: documentation by TEM and by immunofluorescent and immunogold labelling. Development. 1987 Nov;101(3):517–533. doi: 10.1242/dev.101.3.517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Meier S. Development of the embryonic chick otic placode. I. Light microscopic analysis. Anat Rec. 1978 Aug;191(4):447–458. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091910405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier S. Development of the embryonic chick otic placode. II. Electron microscopic analysis. Anat Rec. 1978 Aug;191(4):459–477. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091910406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Newgreen D. F., Minichiello J. Control of epitheliomesenchymal transformation. I. Events in the onset of neural crest cell migration are separable and inducible by protein kinase inhibitors. Dev Biol. 1995 Jul;170(1):91–101. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1995.1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nichols D. H. Ultrastructure of neural crest formation in the midbrain/rostral hindbrain and preotic hindbrain regions of the mouse embryo. Am J Anat. 1987 Jun;179(2):143–154. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001790207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nieto M. A., Sechrist J., Wilkinson D. G., Bronner-Fraser M. Relationship between spatially restricted Krox-20 gene expression in branchial neural crest and segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain. EMBO J. 1995 Apr 18;14(8):1697–1710. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07159.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Represa J., León Y., Miner C., Giraldez F. The int-2 proto-oncogene is responsible for induction of the inner ear. Nature. 1991 Oct 10;353(6344):561–563. doi: 10.1038/353561a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Richardson G. P., Crossin K. L., Chuong C. M., Edelman G. M. Expression of cell adhesion molecules during embryonic induction. III. Development of the otic placode. Dev Biol. 1987 Jan;119(1):217–230. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90223-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rowe A., Brickell P. M. Expression of the chicken retinoid X receptor-gamma gene in migrating cranial neural crest cells. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1995 Jul;192(1):1–8. doi: 10.1007/BF00186986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schoenwolf G. C., Alvarez I. S. Roles of neuroepithelial cell rearrangement and division in shaping of the avian neural plate. Development. 1989 Jul;106(3):427–439. doi: 10.1242/dev.106.3.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schoenwolf G. C., Alvarez I. S. Specification of neurepithelium and surface epithelium in avian transplantation chimeras. Development. 1991 Jul;112(3):713–722. doi: 10.1242/dev.112.3.713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sechrist J., Scherson T., Bronner-Fraser M. Rhombomere rotation reveals that multiple mechanisms contribute to the segmental pattern of hindbrain neural crest migration. Development. 1994 Jul;120(7):1777–1790. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.7.1777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sechrist J., Serbedzija G. N., Scherson T., Fraser S. E., Bronner-Fraser M. Segmental migration of the hindbrain neural crest does not arise from its segmental generation. Development. 1993 Jul;118(3):691–703. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.3.691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Slack J. M. Peanut lectin receptors in the early amphibian embryo: regional markers for the study of embryonic induction. Cell. 1985 May;41(1):237–247. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90077-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Van de Water T. R. Tissue interactions and cell differentiation: neurone-sensory cell interaction during otic development. Development. 1988;103 (Suppl):185–193. doi: 10.1242/dev.103.Supplement.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wilkinson D. G. Molecular mechanisms of segmental patterning in the vertebrate hindbrain and neural crest. Bioessays. 1993 Aug;15(8):499–505. doi: 10.1002/bies.950150802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES