Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1998 Jul;193(Pt 1):105–119. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19310105.x

Anatomy of the pig heart: comparisons with normal human cardiac structure

SIMON J CRICK 1 ,✉, MARY N SHEPPARD 2 , SIEW YEN HO 1 , LIOR GEBSTEIN 3 , ROBERT H ANDERSON 1
PMCID: PMC1467827  PMID: 9758141

Abstract

Transgenic technology has potentially solved many of the immunological difficulties of using pig organs to support life in the human recipient. Nevertheless, other problems still remain. Knowledge of cardiac anatomy of the pig (Sus scrofa) is limited despite the general acceptance in the literature that it is similar to that of man. A qualitative analysis of porcine and human cardiac anatomy was achieved by gross examination and dissection of hearts with macrophotography. The porcine organ had a classic ‘Valentine heart’ shape, reflecting its location within the thorax and to the orientation of the pig's body (unguligrade stance). The human heart, in contrast, was trapezoidal in silhouette, reflecting man's orthograde posture. The morphologically right atrium of the pig was characterised by the tubular shape of its appendage (a feature observed on the left in the human heart). The porcine superior and inferior caval veins opened into the atrium at right angles to one another, whereas in man the orifices were directly in line. A prominent left azygous vein (comparable to the much reduced left superior caval or oblique vein in man) entered on the left side of the pig heart and drained via the coronary sinus. The porcine left atrium received only 2 pulmonary veins, whereas 4 orifices were generally observed in man. The sweep between the inlet and outlet components of the porcine right ventricle was less marked than in man, and a prominent muscular moderator band was situated in a much higher position within the porcine right ventricle compared with that of man. The apical components of both porcine ventricles possessed very coarse trabeculations, much broader than those observed in the human ventricles. In general, aortic-mitral fibrous continuity was reduced in the outlet component of the porcine left ventricle, with approximately two-thirds of the aortic valve being supported by left ventricular musculature. Several potentially significant differences exist between porcine and human hearts. It is important that these differences are considered as the arguments continue concerning the use of transgenic pig hearts for xenotransplantation.

Keywords: Cardiac anatomy, xenotransplantation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (899.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alvarez L., Saucedo R., Aránega A., Melguizo C., Velez C., Aránega A. E. Corazón cerdo: sistema papilo-tendino-valvular del ventrículo derecho. Anat Histol Embryol. 1993 Dec;22(4):319–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.1993.tb00226.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowman T. A., Hughes H. C. Swine as an in vivo model for electrophysiologic evaluation of cardiac pacing parameters. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1984 Mar;7(2):187–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1984.tb04885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowman T. A., Hughes H. C. Ventriculoatrial conduction in swine during cardiac pacing: animal model for retrograde conduction. Am Heart J. 1984 Aug;108(2):337–341. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(84)90621-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen J. M., Michler R. E. Heart xenotransplantation: lessons learned and future prospects. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Sep-Oct;12(5):869–875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cozzi E., White D. J. The generation of transgenic pigs as potential organ donors for humans. Nat Med. 1995 Sep;1(9):964–966. doi: 10.1038/nm0995-964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Douglas W. R. Of pigs and men and research: a review of applications and analogies of the pig, sus scrofa, in human medical research. Space Life Sci. 1972 Jun;3(3):226–234. doi: 10.1007/BF00928167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GUINEY E. J. THE PIG AS AN EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY. Ir J Med Sci. 1965 Jun;474:273–280. doi: 10.1007/BF02944096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guerreiro D., Lennox S. C., Anderson R. H. Postnatal development of the pig heart. Cardiovasc Res. 1980 Dec;14(11):675–679. doi: 10.1093/cvr/14.11.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gwathmey J. K., Nakao S., Come P. C., Abelmann W. H. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac chamber size and functional performance in swine. Am J Vet Res. 1989 Feb;50(2):192–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HAMLIN R. L. The QRS electrocardiogram, epicardiogram, vectorcardiogram and ventricular excitation of swine. Am J Physiol. 1960 Mar;198:537–542. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1960.198.3.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hughes H. C. Swine in cardiovascular research. Lab Anim Sci. 1986 Aug;36(4):348–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. James A. Transplants with transgenic pig organs? Lancet. 1993 Jul 3;342(8862):45–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Larks S. D., Wescott R. B., Larks G. G. Electrocardiographic studies of miniature swine: normal values. Lab Anim Sci. 1971 Aug;21(4):553–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liedtke A. J., Hughes H. C., Neely J. R. An experimental model for studying myocardial ischemia. Correlation of hemodynamic performance and metabolism in the working swine heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975 Feb;69(2):203–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lucke J. N. Determination of the cardiac output of anaesthetised pigs using a dye dilution method. Res Vet Sci. 1976 Nov;21(3):364–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Opthof T., de Jonge B., Jongsma H. J., Bouman L. N. Functional morphology of the pig sinoatrial node. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1987 Dec;19(12):1221–1236. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2828(87)80532-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sarris G. E., Miller D. C. Valvular-ventricular interaction: the importance of the mitral chordae tendineae in terms of global left ventricular systolic function. J Card Surg. 1988 Sep;3(3):215–234. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1988.tb00241.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Swan H., Meagher D. M. Total body bypass in miniature pigs. Postperfusion pulmonary hypertension. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1971 Jun;61(6):956–967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tranquilli W. J., Parks C. M., Thurmon J. C., Benson G. J., Koritz G. D., Manohar M., Theodorakis M. C. Organ blood flow and distribution of cardiac output in nonanesthetized swine. Am J Vet Res. 1982 May;43(5):895–897. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Uemura H., Anderson R. H., Ho S. Y., Devine W. A., Neches W. H., Smith A., Yagihara T., Kawashima Y. Left ventricular structures in atrioventricular septal defect associated with isomerism of atrial appendages compared with similar features with usual atrial arrangement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Aug;110(2):445–452. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70241-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Verdouw P. D., Wolffenbuttel B. H., van der Giessen W. J. Domestic pigs in the study of myocardial ischemia. Eur Heart J. 1983 May;4 (Suppl 100):61–67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/4.suppl_c.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang K., Ho S. Y., Gibson D. G., Anderson R. H. Architecture of atrial musculature in humans. Br Heart J. 1995 Jun;73(6):559–565. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.6.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weaver M. E., Pantely G. A., Bristow J. D., Ladley H. D. A quantitative study of the anatomy and distribution of coronary arteries in swine in comparison with other animals and man. Cardiovasc Res. 1986 Dec;20(12):907–917. doi: 10.1093/cvr/20.12.907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. White D., Wallwork J. Xenografting: probability, possibility, or pipe dream? Lancet. 1993 Oct 9;342(8876):879–880. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91939-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES